• wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      No one can agree on which time to use so time change will never go away. It’s really annoying. I don’t give a shit which we use, just toss of the ducking time change. It’s 1 hour, people gotta chill.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fuck at this point does it even matter? The time change is bullshit on a baseline so long as it’s done on the state level it shouldnt be too bad since eventually one of them will probably win out.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am a champion of the idea of keeping daylight saving over standard time but I am more and more starting to think that the time change is the best compromise we are going to get with the people who insist on getting to work at 8am in the light.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Let’s look at NY city.

        June 21th longest day, sunrise is at 5:24 am (Set 8:31 pm)

        December 21th longest night, sunrise is at 6:42 am (Set 4:32 pm)

        If you got rid of daylight savings time then the sun would rise at 4:24 am in June and set at 7:31 pm.

        (Most people in NY probably want the extra hour of light at 7:31 pm instead of 4:24 am)

        If you kept permanent daylight savings then the sun would rise at 7:42 am in December and set at 5:32 pm)

        (Most people in NY probably want some light before 8 because it’s going to be dark after dinner anyways)

        So many people are awake before 8 am compared to 5 am

        So many people enjoy the light at 7:30 pm in the summer

        Switching really is the sweet spot for NY

        Location is definitely important too in hating or liking DST

        Ontonagon, Mi sun sets at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

        Dexter, Me sun sets at 4:10 pm tonight (6:33 am rise)

        Same time zone, both northern cities.

        If we didn’t get off DST Ontonagon wouldn’t see the sunrise until almost 9 am today

        People in Dexter might have preferred to stay on DST getting light between 7:33 am to 5:10 pm today

        The farther west you live in a time zone the less you like DST generally. Farther east, the more you like it.

        Ontonagon is so west it should really be in Central Time zone.

        If that was the case then the sun would set at 4:25 pm tonight (6:58 am rise) (basically Dexter ME times)

        At that point they might want to stay on DST and it would make it exactly what it was today, sunset at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

      • mos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I just think humans don’t work well with such a sudden change even just 1 hr. Maybe there’s a way we could add/remove a minute every day over two months or something lol

          • mos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            As I was typing it I was trying to figure out how it would work on electronic devices and my head exploded. Let alone just your everyday clock.

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I work at a bank, and people are trying to buy all of our pennies as collectors and leave none for the people who are actually going to use them. it’s a clusterfuck lmao

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      The penny died pretty quick in Canada, I would argue and say it’ll be gone within 3 years, tenders will just round up/down the total and no longer hand them out.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It reminds me of a popular misconception about Earth and our atmosphere and climate.

      A lot of the people who advocate for the environment believe that reduction in trees will jeopardize our oxygen and that we’ll run out of breathable air at some point.

      The problem is actually that trees capture and hold carbon, the danger to the environment is almost strictly just the release of excess carbon.

      If we lost every last tree and phytoplankton bloom in the world, we would still have enough breathable oxygen to last potentially thousands or hundreds of thousands of years, with some estimates depending on a lot of complex factors, saying that some level of of population density could stay alive for millions of years.

      (Edited figures)

      Some of you dummies think I’m saying climate change isn’t a concern. You needa learn to read.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That seems off

        Where are you getting this millions of years number? Seems really unrealistic considering millions of humans live at altitude and have barely enough oxygen in the air as it is

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the only things the Trump admin is doing that I actually agree with and have since I was a child. Fuck coins in general but getting rid of the most dead weight coin of them all is a step in the right direction.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree getting rid of the penny is a good thing, but it’s really bad that this is setting a precedent to give the president a lot more power

      It’s also a really poor implementation considering the government has given no guidance on how businesses must handle it

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Abolishing the USD cent comes way too late.

    Was abolishing the half penny in 1857 a good idea? If so, then abolishing the quarter would be a good idea today. It has about as much buying power as the half penny did in 1857.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, but honestly getting rid of coins is an admission that inflation is high relative to 40-50 years ago. When pretty much every government wants to keep that fact out of the public consciousness. Especially the current US government who wants to both claim we don’t have inflation at all, and are the ones getting rid of the penny.

      I’ve been saying we should drop the penny for almost 2 decades, but I still kind of look at getting rid of the penny as a sign of our current government’s abysmal handling of inflation.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      So I don’t know the term for it, maybe it’s just propaganda, but a quarter feels like it has value.

      The penny however doesn’t have that feeling. Vending machines often say “No Pennies” and toll booths say “No Pennies”, even though the Penny exists everyone sorta already agreed the Penny wasn’t worth the hassle.

      I think you could probably convince people the same is true for the nickel. Although eliminating just the nickel is tricky since you’d keep the dime and quarter and that divides weirdly. So you should also remove the dime but that now really starts to feel like it had value.

      But the quarter. That would be a hard sell. You’re basically eliminating all coins at that point. Unless you plan on making the half dollar wayyy more popular.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        When we got rid of the half penny it was worth more than what dimes are worth now. Quarters are the only useful coin. We should be rounding all transactions to the nearest quarter.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Logically I completely agree. I just don’t think you could convince the US as a whole that’s the way to go.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Should just have dimes.

        $1.1 $1.2 $1.3

        There’s no reason to break our currency into thousandths. Hardly a reason to break it into hundredths.

        Could keep quarters to keep hundredths

        Transactions already need a nickel to do 5 cents. So requiring a quarter to do 5 cents isn’t crazy.

        Say you have to pay $1.05

        Dollar and 3 dimes, quarter in change.

        $1.15

        Dollar and a quarter, dime in change.

        But I think just dimes are needed

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just dimes would probably work logically, but it would feel too weird. If you’re going just dimes, you probably just want to go all in and say no coins.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            50 cent piece would be the way to go. Should then also really push $1 coins, and add in a $2 and $5 coin, although I don’t know if Americans would realistically use them. Coins are much more durable than paper currency though, which would save a lot of money long term

            • MimicJar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I mean the dollar coin never caught on. I know we still printed the dollar bill, so maybe you could force it by halting the dollar bill. But overall I don’t think new coins are the answer.

              Based on one source, Cash is only ~20% of transactions. Maybe it will always be 20% or maybe it will be smaller and smaller as time goes on.

              I think you’re better off eliminating current coins.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like we should be normalizing $1, $2, and $5 coins at this point. I know $1 coins exist, but nobody uses them. If I drop a $1 coin in a tip jar, people say sarcastically “thanks, that 25 cents will go a long way” because they think it’s a quarter.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Canada has $1 and $2 coins, but it’s all irrelevant as 99% of transactions are digital tap cards.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Canada was a decade ahead of the US when it came to implementing tap. It’ll take the US a long while to get to the same level of universal acceptance, starting from so far behind

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good, while we’re at it we should redecimalize. A coin that can’t pay for a significant portion of something is worthless. People used to buy snacks with coins, and like, thats where they thrive. Coins are more expensive than bills but they can change hands a lot more times. A dime for a soda or a cheap snack, maybe a nickel if it’s a good deal on a bag of chips is about right.

    Like, this isn’t even a monetary policy failure, it’s just something that should happen every century or two in an inflationary economy with a 5% target.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The rule should be “if you pay with it at a restaurant it should be a coin” because it represents a daily use rather than weekly or monthly and much higher levels of wear and tear.

      If not for credit cards we’d probably need $10 coins.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s about damned time. We honestly should have nothing smaller than quarters right now, going by the same logic as discontinuing the half-penny forever ago (which had more equivalent purchasing power than the dime does now).

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is why it would’ve been better to do this legally because there’s going to be 10,000 corporations and banks trying to superman 3 everyone’s rounding errors (eg rounding up for customers and down for taxes). This is going to create a lot of really stupid embezzlement scandals and lawsuits. Not to mention you can still pay in pennies with a credit card.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    When Trumpflation kicks in they’ll need to stop minting more denominations too.