The findings suggest U.S. consumers will continue to struggle with high prices — something Trump had promised to address in the run-up to his re-election.

Six months into Donald Trump’s unprecedented gambit to impose sizable tariffs on imports, U.S. consumers are already shouldering as much as 55% of their costs, according to a new report from Goldman Sachs analysts.

And with new tariffs likely on the way, the cost burden could rise even higher, they said.

The findings, released Sunday, suggest U.S. consumers will continue to struggle with high prices — something Trump had promised to address in the run-up to his re-election. While inflation rates have come down from the post-Covid peak, they have remained stuck above levels economists consider healthy, causing consumers and businesses alike to continue to report feeling burdened by price increases.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    19 days ago

    Who else would be bearing the costs? The government is profiting from them, foreign companies and individuals aren’t affected beyond a drop in purchasing power, and companies are just going to pass the costs on to the consumer.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      foreign companies and individuals aren’t affected beyond a drop in purchasing power

      Actually they are affected. Either their profit margins drop, or they drop trade with the USA completely.

      But any of this still affects American consumers.

      I have no doubt that Goldman Sachs have their numbers right, but not the implications and knock-on effects etc.

      • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Their percent margin might drop, but there is no way they just eat say a 100 dollar extra tariff charge. They would charge 100 dollars more on the item(s). They make the same profit, consumer pays more. The only time this isn’t true, is if the consumer will not or cannot pay the extra 100 dollars for the product and the sale is lost. In such a case they may try to pay part of the tariff and not raise their costs to account for margin.

        In practice I think many companies will actually charge more than the tariff to maintain percent margin.

        So definitely affects US consumers and companies, but may not affect foreign companies really at all.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    19 days ago

    And 6 months from now, it will be the full cost. They’re just turning up the heat slowly enough that the frogs don’t notice the difference.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Tell your employers and demand a raise to compensate. Pass the buck until someone in the finance sector gives a shit.

  • eletes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 days ago

    Is the GOP play here to just keep manipulating the stock market with tariffs then remove them when the campaigns are in swing so they can say “look how we fixed the economy!!1!”

    Which their base may or may not eat up depending on how bad their attention span are.

    The other option is they have no plan and their just gonna keep grifting.

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 days ago

    See? Americans actually do love high taxes and big government! Maybe Bernie should start talking about how Mexico’s gonna pay for universal healthcare! (And then just raise taxes)

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’m so broke rn that I’m rehoming most of my ducks. I’m only keeping 3 of the 8 that I have. I’ll save like $60/month on feed with a smaller flock. That money won’t go towards my savings, but to my mortgage payment which will go up by $40 starting in December.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      The large retailers were trying to hide the price increases initially.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    Whoa, are you saying not all companies were total loyalists to Taco and didn’t just eat the cost of his egotistical fantasies?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    Only? I would have expected them to take all, and a bit. Never let an opportunity to make some extra profit go to waste…

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    What childhood enemy of Trump’s is making kitchen cabinets and is now being punished?

    The “National Security” implications of cabinetry are beyond me.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s almost like Americans should have listened to every fucking economist in the country.

    But Americans are stupid, so here we are.