• Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    268
    ·
    8 days ago

    In a written decision, Judge Gregory Carro said that although there is no doubt that the killing was not an ordinary street crime, New York law doesn’t consider something terrorism simply because it was motivated by ideology.

    “While the defendant was clearly expressing an animus toward UHC, and the health care industry generally, it does not follow that his goal was to ‘intimidate and coerce a civilian population,’ and indeed, there was no evidence presented of such a goal,” Carro wrote.

    Hope the rest of the trial goes with as much sense as this

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 days ago

      I understand why they tried to throw those charges in, but I don’t like the inconsistency of doing so.

      I agree this is a sensible outcome.

    • boheme@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 days ago

      The emphasis on “intimidate and coerce a civilian population” is interesting. Seems to imply billionaires are not considered part of the civilian population. As they shouldn’t be.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        Before we go giving the legal system a pat on the back for that, that’s not really what’s happening. The law is written with a high level of provable intent in mind, and that’s the only way it could possibly pass 1st Amendment muster. It’s really, really hard to prove anyone intended to intimidate anyone.

    • Guidy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      The only people without such animus either work for the industry or are shareholders.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s good to see things simmer back down to reality after all the inflammatory politically-motivated accusations. Everyone deserves a fair trial.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    8 days ago

    Anyone looking at the terrorism charge knew it was bullshit, but check this:

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/16/luigi-mangione-terrorism-charges-dropped

    ““Counts 1 and 2, charging defendant with Murder in the First Degree (in furtherance of an act of terrorism) and Murder in the Second Degree as a Crime of Terrorism, are dismissed as legally insufficient,” Carro wrote. “The People presented legally sufficient evidence of all other counts, including Murder in the Second Degree (intentional).””

    They didn’t just toss the terrorism addendum, they tossed two of the murder charges with the terrorism rider.

  • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    The cops have totally botched this case. No piece of evidence is not tainted, and that perp walk is enough to bias any jury. He should be let free (for a myriad of reasons).

    • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Lmao that helicopter perp walk with the giant sniper/assault rifle guys. Transparently obvious what they were trying to accomplish

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 days ago

    In a written decision released as Mangione appeared in court, Judge Gregory Carro said that although there is no doubt that the killing was not an ordinary street crime, New York law doesn’t consider something terrorism simply because it was motivated by ideology.

    Obviously…

    They say killing anyone wealthy is terrorism, because they don’t think fonus as real people.

    They only care about wealthy bigots

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    Excellent news. Now the prosecution needs to find and convince 12 people that he did it. I’m not sure they have the evidence to do that.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t doubt they have evidence that irrefutably proves he’s the shooter…

      The issue has always been legally admissible evidence.

      I think they broke a shit ton of laws to find out who did it, then failed to retroactively create a “partel investigation” that would have legally uncovered the evidence so it could be used anyway.

      Like, that’s pretty normal for cops. They break laws to solve a crime, make up some bullshit about how they’d have found it anyways, then overcharge to get a plea deal and avoid trial.

      Luigi ain’t taking a plea deal, and while they may very well know it’s him, they can’t prove it in court

      • Lawyerator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I think the term is “parallel investigation” or parallel construction investigation." I don’t doubt that you are correct though.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, that’s just a typo.

          The whole thing is bullshit tho. When you already know where you’ll find evidence, it’s easy to justify after the fact how you could have legally been able to search that one place.

          But they can’t narrow it down to that spot except by violating civil rights.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I do doubt they have evidence he is the shooter. Just the footage taken at the scene has details that don’t match with Luigi at all. He was in the area since the image from the hostel is very likely him, but just being in the general vicinity isn’t enough to convict.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Dude…

          It’s 2025.

          If you think the US government can’t tell who was on a street at a certain time and then search everyone’s cell phones and track where they’ve been to narrow it down to a very small number of people…

          Like

          I dunno what to tell you.

          The sun also rises each morning and sets at night. And Tuesdays usually follow Mondays.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            You are greatly overestimating the diligence of the police. All they care about is finding anyone to pin it on. They’re not doing all that work when they can frame a patsy much more easily.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              This isn’t a random crime they don’t care about…

              A wealthy CEO was killed.

              This honestly isn’t that difficult to figure out why it’s different. But I feel like you’ve put zero logical thought into your multitude of strong opinions about this.

              • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                All the more reason to pin the blame on anyone they can as quickly as they can. You don’t want the plebeian masses getting the idea that their masters are vulnerable.