• boheme@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 days ago

    The emphasis on “intimidate and coerce a civilian population” is interesting. Seems to imply billionaires are not considered part of the civilian population. As they shouldn’t be.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      Before we go giving the legal system a pat on the back for that, that’s not really what’s happening. The law is written with a high level of provable intent in mind, and that’s the only way it could possibly pass 1st Amendment muster. It’s really, really hard to prove anyone intended to intimidate anyone.