• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    13 days ago

    Both cars support oppressive dictators, but one is cheaper, supports CarPlay / Android auto, and has actually buttons for things.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      13 days ago

      I am not sure you can say BYD supports a dictator per se, more like it exists in a state capitalist country where you exist at the behest of the dictator.

      Elon actively pushed and spent money to get trump elected.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        True, but that thing is like a fighter jet compared to Telsa’s void of emptiness. 14 controls on the wheel (and they’re labeled), real controls for drive modes, there are basic climate controls on the center console, you can manually adjust fan orientation, etc.

        It’s still overly reliant on touch, but I’d easily take that over a Telsa.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Meh. I would not take either. In fact I actually didn’t. I went to a showroom and got inside their EVs and PHEVs while looking for a car. My immediate reaction after sitting in the driver’s seat of their PHEV was “I don’t want to drive this”. Same thing with the pure EV. I’ll give you the wheel, but those A/C controls next to the “shifter” are touch surfaces instead of actual buttons, and they’re just as annoying and worthless as touchscreen controls. Which is sad because those cars have fantastic stats on paper and very competitive prices. Unfortunately most EVs on the market have fucking stupid interior designs. Very often you have to choose between affordable and well designed. Not very many that are both.

          In the end I decided not to buy a new car at all. Still got my 2015 Leon.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m genuinely surprised people be ok with BYD on Lemmy. It’s authoritarian spyware, period. There are more options than these two - ww don’t have to choose the lesser evil.

  • Legom7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    My commute is about 20 miles a day. Charging level 1 at work is enough unless I go out on the weekend. My Nissan Leaf has been good enough for me. And it is neither Tesla nor Chinese.

    • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      My only gripe with that car is that it looks really bland. Then again I am no James Dean where I sit with two kids seats with the back full of shopping

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Damn good car too. My bro rocked one for years, deceptively large inside. Quarterly he’d drive about 1000km in it which I think was mad but made it work, 80km at a time!!!

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    CCP subsidizes the absolute shit out of domestic EVs (and many other emerging technologies) which basically forces people to buy them, so it shouldn’t be any surprise they’re selling them like crazy. Meanwhile conservatives in the US are stripping incentives away.

    E: holy shit, the Lemmy tankies are real. I literally only spoke negatively of the US and yet I’m immediately blasted with their default replies; whataboutisms and false equivalencies about the US, in a conversation about the European market.

    E2: please read up on Predatory Pricing before replying to me.

    • Tyra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      Good! I‘m grateful that the CCP is stepping in where the West is ignorant. Thanks to heavy lobbying by fossil fuels and car industries we would never have affordable cars in Europe without China. Thank you Xi Jinping for saving the climate 🙏

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        LOOOOOLOLOLOL have you looked at China’s greenhouse gas contributions lately? They don’t give a fuck about the climate, they’re just trying to drive other countries out of the market.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 days ago

            That’s because they’re also heavily subsidizing that industry out of self-interest. That’s the “emerging markets” I mentioned above.

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              13 days ago

              Which sounds like a good idea for everybody. Maybe other countries should do the same thing.

              I’m no fan of West Taiwan but they’re doing a lot more to decarbonize than most other major economies.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Like always, it’s a great idea, right up until China jacks up the prices after they’ve driven out all the competition and common people can’t buy them anymore.

            • Tyra@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 days ago

              Oh no, a country acts out of self-interest! A concept that is completely foreign to the West 😱 At least their “self-interest“ has cheaper EVs for the rest of the world as a result. What are the coeffects of the US defending their self-interests? Rise in facism? Another genocide?

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                You’re moving the goalposts. You were literally thanking Xi for “saving the climate”.

                Once again, I am not having a pissing match about which country is better, I am discussing the success of electric vehicles from China.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      E: holy shit, the Lemmy tankies are real

      Yes they are, but in this case you are just wrong. I guarantee you I’m not a tankie, but I think it’s pretty clear that USA has absolutely also subsidized electric cars, especially Tesla that has been generously subsidized in multiple ways, also subsidizing their charging network.
      On top of that, USA has prevented a lot of outside competition with tariffs.

      All in all i am personally sick and tired of Americans always pointing fingers at the Chinese for doing the exact same thing Americans are doing.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Nope you are just wrong and intentionally spreading false equivalencies and making strawman arguments.

        Let’s put aside for a moment the fact that I only spoke negatively about the US (the discussion was about Europe), and instead focus on the fact that the US has subsidized electric vehicles from around the world to the tune of $1B in an effort to promote the sales of clean vehicles. China has subsidized to the tune of $230B for domestic vehicles only.

    • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Just read an article recently that while battery cell cost has fallen and overall capacity have risen, price of EVs continues to rise.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      CCP subsidizes the absolute shit out of domestic EVs

      Not really. Metal is cheap. Lithium and rare earths are cheap. Abundance policies for raw materials aren’t subsidies. Inflation is low and so are interest rates, and so factories are also cheap. Abundance in robotics too. Highly automated factories make low cost cars.

      Prices are not absurdly lower than western cars. Maybe $5k less for equivalent to Tesla, and

      which basically forces people to buy them

      a key program in China is not from CCP. City governments give licence plates to EVs letting them drive every day. There is a trade in incentive, and sales tax break, still, afaik, but all of that is less than what US had, and EVs without subsidies are cheaper than ICE vehicles, as they are starting to be in the west as well.

      You are being downvoted because you don’t know what you’re talking about, and “everyone’s a tankie” for not being as uninformed or propagandized as you.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t get how a company is losing this much in multiple countries yet is still operating?

    Like if they can lose this much and still be operating and investments not tanking, would it follow that they can pay better wages and benefits?

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I have a Chevy Bolt EUV. Maybe it’s still cunty. But I’m pretty sure it better than China spyware or a Nazi.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t think Musk much cares or ever did. The goal was to milk tesla for every last dime.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      He didn’t care so much he bawled on trump’s shoulder and got him to buy one.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        That was for show. And not to fix the underlying problems. If he cared, he would actually find and fix the problems.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          just look how he treated Twitter once he bought it. He cares…. just about the wrong shit.

          Because he’s unstable and undiagnosed and in denial.

          And yet somehow he seems to legitimately think that’s how you do business.

          Perhaps it’s because America coddles everything under the capitalist label so he doesn’t have to do business like he has to care about it succeeding or face maybe actions have consequences. And he has too many millions to have to count anything else as a success.just worries about ppl being ‘meanies’

          The system makes it so that the rich fail at failing.

          Enablism and denial all the way down.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Good thing the Tesla board voted to give Elmo all those billions to make him stay, because for a second there was an actual risk that Tesla could survive as a company without Elmo, but now they kept him and made sure they’ll all go down off that cliff.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I don’t know about you but I drive over 5-10km regularly. For a short miserable stretch my daily commute was 90 miles. Buying household groceries or anything of size sounds annoying or impossible on bike. And then there’s work tools and whatnot that many professionals keep in vehicle.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      The ebike option meme is so laughable. I recently did some research on cargo bikes and the entry models cost as much as a used ICE car with no air con, no rain cover, no heating, no safety. Ebike people are straight up delusional in thinking this is ready to replace cars.

      Getting a second hand ice car is objectively the best thing you can do right now for everyone involved unless you ride half a million km a year.

    • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Buying household groceries or anything of size sounds annoying or impossible on bike.

      Not sure why buying groceries on a bike would be annoying or impossible. I do all my grocery shopping by bike, every single day, sometimes twice a day. Just bring a backpack.

      As for ‘anything of size’, what would you need to transport? I still have a car, but I use it so little that I only need to buy gas maybe once or twice a year.

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      I tried it and in my country they’re restricted to 15.5mph so largely did nothing for me as my route is out in the countryside.

      I moved to an e-moped (like an electric vespa) and it’s been amazing. About £1k to buy, £80 to insure and albeit restricted to 50mile range the equivalent mpg is something like 400mpg.

      Naturally doesn’t work if you need to carry kids or large objects around routinely but has been great for me

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m completely out of shape and don’t exercise at all, but commuted to work on a bike when my workplace was ~5 miles away. Wasn’t hard at all and only took a little longer than a car. Had a rack on the back and bags to pick up groceries too. If you need carry a lot of heavy tools every day, it obviously wouldn’t be ideal. Even then a bicycle trailer could be used up to something like 100lbs.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    i drive a 440. it’s got a giant supercharger sticking out of the hood trying to get me pulled over all the time. i have to wear earplugs while driving to avoid permanent hearing loss. there’s no way to listen to shiteating death metal while driving, because the engine is just too loud. handles turns like shit. i don’t give a fuck

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    I wonder if a large part of this as well is strictly because BYD is priced cheaper. I know for me personally 90 percent of the reason I haven’t invested in electric is because they’re all still luxury priced.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      nah, forget about them

      let us have economical cars because we don’t need these massive expensive things just to go 5km to get a load of groceries

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Let us have safe bicycle infrastructure do that we can bike to those stores, how about that? And with that, add mixed constructions in the suburbs so that people have small local stores around.

        A bike costs a fraction of a car

        Bicycle infrastructure building and maintenance costs a fraction of that for cars

        Bicycles don’t emit CO2. And for those wise asses saying that the cyclist does, it’s a fraction of a fraction of a car because you’re not lugging 2 tonnes of stell around to transport you and a bottle of milk.

        Cycling infrastructure is much more efficient, you can push a shit tonne more people over the same road if you don’t need big ass cars. Yes, even your Mercedes smart car is I ass compared to a bicycle

        It creates much much less pollution from tire dust

        It’s much safer, bicycles kill only a fraction of the people that cars kill all year round

        It’s healthier, people do exercise not because they went to the gym, but all day every day with their bikes

        It cuts the noise pollution

        It’s cheaper because no taxes, no gas needed, maintenance is a fraction of that of a car.

        It’s way less wasteful

        It lowers aggression. Though it may or may not exist, I’ve never heard of bicycle road rage

        Need more?

        Less cars is less parking spaces. Parking spaces get cities barely any taxable income. Instead of these ugly ass concrete wasteland parkitsoaces you can now have restaurants with outside patios which can be taxed. Couple that with the cheaper infrastructure, and that alone should be an obvious reason as to why do this

        It’s really not that much slower. For typical short trips, bicycles usually only add some 10-20% of required time to your trip.

        For any trip over say, 5-10 kilometers, use good public transportation

        For those once in a lifetime trips where you actually need a car because you need to transport something huge, use one of those Evo rent-a-car.

        In the Netherlands, a huge amount of people don’t have a car. Not because they can’t (they totally can) but because it’s stupid to have one. You can go everywhere by bike, you can jump with your bike in a train when needed to go further, cars are expensive and bad for everyone, why even have one?

        • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          That works in the city but i live in a remote area, and have an hour and a half round trip to work every day because its not economically viable for me to move closer.

          Since I doubt Canada/BC will spend the money putting in viable public transit/high speed rail, I just want them to do the bare minimum to allow me to afford to stop burning gas to afford my next meal.

          While striving for turning every small town into a walkable city sounds great and amazing on paper, the reality is it won’t happen, so we should push for baby steps in the right direction instead only focusing on the absolute ideal.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            stuff like this is why I want to focus on the wide, sweeping generalization of “smaller vehicle is better”

            there’s no need for someone in your position to drive a massive crossover for your commute in case you need to pick up 30 lb of groceries after work. you can do that with a hatchback, and pretty much the biggest reason that people don’t choose to do it with a hatchback is that they’re afraid of the bigger heavier vehicles on the road

            I still push bicycle infrastructure, but I’m not going to push for everybody to get on bikes. I’m going to push for everybody to stop having such goddamn offensive dangerous vehicles (yes please drive at me at 90 km/h with blinding headlights in a 4,000 lb vehicle with a hood that is above my eye level when I’m in a vehicle with 8 in of ground clearance), and try to get them to realize that no it’s not okay because it came that way, you bought it and you have a responsibility as the owner and driver

            • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              And I don’t drive a large crossover, I drive an escape phev, carpool with 2 other people, and use it for more than just ‘30 pounds of groceries’.

              I have filled it to the brim and gone camping multiple times this year, use it to transport my recycling to the transfer station every couple months, and at least twice a year do a large grocery shop at the Costco 4 hours away, stuffing it as full as I can manage.

              I regularly use it to transport things that wouldn’t fit in a vehicle smaller than this one. Hell, I managed to stuff my stove in the thing, though only just barely.

              For my daily commute, since I charge it both at home and at work, I only burn 3-4L of gas, which I would say is quite good for nearly 150km.

              The only way for my daily/weekly/monthly/yearly routine to be more eco friendly is if I could afford to trade it in for a full electric vehicle - and with the trips I do on a regular basis (including camping, day trips to the ‘nearby’ lakes, occasional work driving), I would need something with a range above 600km, preferably 700km to be safe in the winter. Otherwise I would have to maintain 2 vehicles - one an electric with a range of at least 200km and the other a small truck or mid sized SUV, and that kind of defeats the entire purpose.

              • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                right, like you’re using your vehicle appropriately for its capabilities. people seem to think that they need to use it at 10% of its capabilities

                • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  10%? Try 1%… For every 1 of me in this area there are literally 10 lifted king cab shortboxes that never get used for truck purposes on the highway for the same commute as me.

                  The excuse is always “but I need it if I go offroad or want to tow my boat/camper to the lake!” as if they do that more than once a year.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            You’re saying “this solution won’t work for me so nobody should have it”. Try instead “good that it works for you, but I need XYZ so we can tackle the problem on both fronts.”

            • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              That’s… Not at all what I am saying.

              Go read the rest of the thread, where I agree the ideal is great, but we should be taking realistic steps towards it, instead of an unrealistic, all or nothing attitude that doesn’t take rural Canadians into consideration.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I agree with all of this and personally I have replaced as many car trips as I can with a bicycle

          however I also recognize that that’s simply too far for most people right now, at least in my area. people love their cars. I would just love it if they weren’t so damn dangerous and offensive, and I wasn’t nearly killed every time I go out and they come near me. that’s literally a 50/50 chance when I bike to the grocery store that somebody nearly kills me (actually in the past 3 weeks that ratio is a little bit safer, but history shows that I’ll have a bunch of things happen in a short time to bring it back to even).

          first we need people to recognize that they don’t need massive vehicles. then an extension of that logic is that they don’t need a motor vehicle for a lot of things.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Bicycle road rage does exist, between road bikers and regulars, between fast electric and regulars and in general because plenty assholes do also ride bicycles if the infrastructure is good enough.

          Other than that, all valid points!