• FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s using AI to ruin your codebase and build technical debt.

    I think it is very funny and fully support companies doing this to themselves.

      • wischi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the most hilarious thing was their public Copilot demonstration working on the .NET source code. They basically showed the world that copilot isn’t ready for serious work.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        It were they that have been bragging that more than 50% of their code was written by AI, weren’t?

        Anyway, that’s counted by lines of code, not in number of mini-vans. They can still use a better statistic.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    I honestly thought vibe coding was a joke until someone posted a video about it and then realized people were serious.

    It’s basically the equivalent to your friend who has a brilliant idea for an app and just needs you to do the coding for it - without having any clue how IT actually works.

    • czardestructo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I thought it was a joke until someone at my company gave a company wide presentation on how to use AI to accelerate coding and st several points flat out ADMITTED he didn’t know what the hell it was doing but you just need to ‘baby sit’ it and you get useful scripts out of it. I’m a hardware engineer and I wanted to scream at him.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not just for coding either. Yesterday, my senior director used Google’s AI to ask about the architecture to integrate one of our vendor products with our ERP system (usually my job). Fortunately the AI did me a solid and said “This is a highly complex integration 🤯”.

        Yeah… No shit, that’s why so many of us are employed. Shit’s complicated.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Now, your friend with the birlliant idea doesn’t need you anymore and can ask a chatbot to make his brilliant app all by himself!

      That is definitely a great benefit of vibe coding: it’s an idiot magnet and frees up our brainspace.

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Prompt an LLM to write a bit of code that does something. Do this 9000 times until it spits out something that vaguely accomplishes this task. You can’t push any of the fever dream nonsense it created into the main branch until you check it thoroughly. In the end you spend more time with this process than you would have if you’d just written it yourself.

    The C suite and the board members continue jerking each other off as they call this “efficiency.”

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Original definition: using AI to create a small bespoke kinda-crap-but-it-works apps or games for personal use. It’s a shitty proto but it’s interesting.

    (My reaction: ooo not my jam but that sounds neat I guess)

    Modern definition: it’s a multi-quadrispillion dollar industry and it’s the future according to some very important board members.

    (My reaction: …capitalism ruins fucking everything)

    • Konstant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Vibe coding” is an informal term, mostly used in online programming communities, that refers to writing code in a relaxed, intuitive, or improvisational way rather than following a strict plan or methodology.

      It’s often associated with:

      Experimentation → typing out ideas, running them quickly, and adjusting on the fly.

      Flow state → coding while listening to music, late at night, or just for fun without rigid structure.

      Prioritizing creativity over rules → not worrying too much about best practices, efficiency, or readability at first—just “feeling out” the solution.

      Playfulness → sometimes it means coding with minimal context, like making something cool without knowing exactly how it’ll end up.

      Some people use “vibe coding” positively (as in getting into the zone and letting intuition guide you), while others use it humorously or critically (as in writing spaghetti code without much forethought).

      Would you like me to give you some examples of how vibe coding looks in practice—like snippets that show the contrast between “structured coding” vs. “vibe coding”?

  • dbx12@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wikipedia defines it as

    Advocates of vibe coding say that it allows even amateur programmers to produce software without the extensive training and skills required for software engineering.

    Now if you replace some words you see how absolutely bonkers the idea in general is:

    Advocates of aircraft autopilots say that it allows even amateur pilots to fly large airplanes without the extensive training and skills required for commercial pilots.

    • Stitch0815@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mhhhh Yes and no

      Should vibe coding be used in critical infrastructure. Hell nah

      But could I could not care less if someone vibecodes a game or the one millionth second brain productivity app.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unless you’re insinuating that using AI to vibe code is like sticking a vibrating dildo up your own ass just to “win” (and then get accused of cheating), then no… it’s not at all like that, lol

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Uh…no. I’m saying it’s like how you get into a ‘zone’ and seem to do magic (win) that others proceed to, yes, accuse you of cheating. How did you even come to that conclusion, buddy?

        Vibrating dildo? Sheesh!

        Lol

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          The chess player who was accused of using a vibrating butt plug to cheat. Ffs.

          Vibe coding is literally like fucking yourself in the ass just to “win”

  • sacredfire@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I remember when the term was first coined and it meant something like “asking an llm to code and NOT attempting to validate, fix or correct the outputs yourself. Just keep prompting in natural language until it works.” It was supposed to be a joke - this sort of use hits a wall pretty quickly and illustrates how limited llms can be.

    The term has taken off and its meaning is now in flux. I did find it particularly amusing seeing all the LinkedIn lunatics start posting LLM written garbage about “integrating vibe coding Into your workflow” because they thought it was the new buzz word… and I guess they were right.