• marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      120
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yep. Just because one side is bad, it doesn’t mean the other is any good.

      Cryptocurrency is still dependent of a pyramid scheme and criminals-enabling. Credit card companies are still a private owned government branch with no concern for human rights and criminals-enabling.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    17 days ago

    Lmao, crypto tech bros coming out of the woodwork trying to get popularity for their bag holder’s game…

    Also pretending that shit hasn’t been bought up by wall street

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I honestly never understood how Lemmy, a privacy and decentralisation focused community, is so vehemently anti-crypto. It’s worse than genAI. Every time it is mentioned, everyone goes “crypto is a scam”. I don’t think I’ve ever seen any good faith discussion around it, just “scam”, “pyramid scheme”, and “only criminals use it”.

    Let’s get something out of the way immediately: shitcoins are a literal pyramid scheme and a scam. Anyone can make their own cryptocurrency in an evening, and anyone who throws money at them is either a fool or a gambler.

    But I really don’t understand what people mean when they say Bitcoin, or Ethereum, or Monero are a scam. Sure they can be used to scam you, just like Amazon gift cards can. Maybe it’s about the price volatility, but the price of all 3 mentioned before is up on a day, week, month, 6 months, year, and 5 year scale. It’s volatile, but is not a scam. If you bought and sold at two random points in time, it’s more likely you made a profit than “got scammed”. You know what actually is a scam? Credit scores, overdraft fees, having to pay to check your balance, and so many other fucked up practices in the US banking system.

    “Criminals use them” is just the worst fucking argument, especially in a space like this. Are PGP, VPNs and TOR for criminals too? Do you think getting rid of crypto would stop crime?

    And yes, proof of work fucking sucks. The energy consumption of Bitcoin mining is a problem. I am not a cryptobro who spends all his time making trades and is here to tell you that crypto is the salvation. They are far from being “good” for everyday use. I just wanted to point out how it seems that critical thought gets shut down at the sight of those 6 letters, and I hope someone can explain to me what they find so terrible about crypto (aside from environmental concerns and shitcoins)

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      17 days ago

      Lemmy is quite left-leaning, and the impetus behind creating Bitcoin was right-wing Austrian school economics. Now, it’s being pushed by literal fascists.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        I can’t say I’ve ever seen fascists pushing Bitcoins, but then again I don’t frequent those spaces. I struggle to see how they are ideologically similar though. Doesn’t seem like a very authoritarian concept

        And can we really say we know what brought about the publication of the bitcoin whitepaper?

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 days ago

          Trump, Bukele, Milei, Orban, Thiel, Musk, etc. It’s the “Dark Enlightenment” and “Network State” type of fascists that want to replace democratic government with stuff like corporate-controlled city-states, and crazy shit like that. They see it as a means to starve the government so they can run their own corporation-like governments.

          The message in the genesis block alludes to the ideology (as that kind of stuff was a major talking point for right-wingers back then), though I guess it’s not definitive proof. The early community was definitely Austrian-school adjacent right-wingers though.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          The Republicans in US congress just forced through a bunch of pro-crypto crap, if you’re looking for undeniable proof.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think we can. Have you not heard of this phrase before?

          The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks

          Satoshi Nakamoto put it in the zeroth block of the Bitcoin blockchain.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Have you noticed that people who work in tech tend to be less excited about cool new flashy tech developments than the average person?

      It’s similar to how people who have worked in fast food aren’t quite as keen on eating out than the average person.

      Same as watching your co-worker who hasn’t washed his hands after his last shit collect the pieces of a burger that dropped on the dirty floor to sell them to a customer isn’t exactly appetizing, knowing what goes on behind the scenes with tech developments doesn’t really get you on board for that either.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme because it only keeps its value as long as people are constantly buying it. If no one wants to buy it, the value of any amount of bitcoin is zero. This is why people who have bitcoin are trying to convince anyone else to keep buying.

      Your local government-backed currency does not have this problem, because you get paid with it, you pay taxes with it and vendors in your country have to accept it.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think the Lemmy userbase is too small and its easy for a few vocal voices to dominate the conversation.

      There are often contradicting points that the Lemmy hivemind holds.

      Like Lemmy wants to abolish the police but also wants to empower the police to take away people’s guns??? (Talking about the US btw)

      Lemmy loves their doublethink

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 days ago

    Isn’t this a right wing meme about centrists, but with the text changed?

    The Bitcoin side wouldn’t catch you, because that interferes with the user’s choice to hit the ground.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Perhaps the original is right-wing, though this happens a lot (e.g. the “change my mind” guy). This meme seems anti-collective shout, so I’d place it left wing.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 days ago

    Honestly, what’s the point of a credit card? Why don’t people mostly use debit cards? It gets just directly wire transferred from your account. No sort of junk fees or monthly subscription needed. Genuine Question.

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 days ago

      If someone steals your debit card, they can directly take money out of your account. With credit cards, there’s a buffer between the product and the bank account, and it makes it easier to stop fraud

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’ve had my debit card information stolen before. My bank knew before I did, cancelled the fraudulent charges, and refunded my money without any action on my part. Doesn’t seem like a credit card would have been any advantage in my [admittedly anecdotal] case.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          In the US if someone takes your debit card and enters the correct PIN, the transactions are permanent, and the bank has no obligation to give your money back (and if they choose to do so it would be out of their own pocket).

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        But is it really worth all of the junk that you have to accept? I like the credit scoring, the monthly subscription, and, if you miss the date for paying back, the absurdly high fees. Well, yes, with the debit card you have, technically speaking, the risk of someone being able to make about 100€ worth of RFID payments, and then the code is needed again for the next 100€ RFID payments. For everything else that doesn’t involve RFID, the code is needed always.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          The US implementation of chip and PIN left off the PIN. The reason given was “no one wants to put in a PIN every time” so for the vast majority of transactions you just hold up your card to the sensor or put it in the chip reader. PIN is only required for cash withdrawals in my experience.

          • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            Jesus Christ, that is absolutely moronic. No wonder people are so obsessed with losing their card.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Debit cards typically have PIN numbers.

        I know these can be defeated in various ways, but its not usually as simple as, just steal someone’s card.

        Also, you can just go to your bank or credit union, call them, report online or w/e: Hey, my card got stolen, these txns are fraud.

        Might not be as streamlined or as fast as a payment challenge with a credit card, but its not that much worse.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Well not to stop it before it happens, surely, but an easier time reclaiming your money due to the buffer.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Fiscally responsible people do it because of the cash back/perks and 0% interest.

      Fiscally irresponsible people do it because ‘free money’ (ignoring the 28% annual interest).

      Credit cards also offer better consumer protections than debit cards. Ex: chargebacks.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        This is not true for many countries. Debit cards in my country have equal or even better consumer protections than credit cards and are also cheaper.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          It’s true in the United States. In the US, a debit card transaction is an EFTPOS (electronic funds transfer at point of sale) and once you enter your PIN, there are no take-backs and if you want a refund and the merchant refuses, you have to resort to the legal system for recourse. Credit cards, on the other hand, have consumer protection rules and dispute procedures.

      • sobchak@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Fiscally irresponsible

        I mean, there are people who just don’t have the money for a needed “purchase” (like medical care, transportation, or food), and hope they’ll be able to get a better job or make more money in the future to pay it off later. Been there.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      My debit card is a master card.

      They still need to go through a payment processor, using a debit instead of credit card isn’t really the solution to the current problems.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      I buy stuff for work with my personal card and I’ve made probably thousands of dollars from the cash back. Even on my regular cards I get a couple hundred back off of stuff I normally buy.

      There’s other benefits too like using points to buy plane tickets, fancy lobbies in the airport with free food, etc.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Because many people don’t actually have the money on hand. Some do but me and many others are spending money we don’t have yet. It’s a negative feedback loop of debt because capitalism sucks

    • O_i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’ve just got rid of my credit card after 10 years in NA. Yes it can come in handy if you need a couple grand all of a sudden but damn, what a ball and chain, I hated it

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Whaaaaaa, are you talking about bitcoin, the currency developed out of pure kindness and honest intentions and promising equality and equity for all? Surely you can’t mean the grand and noble bitcoin, I was told for years that it would decentralize all currency and make all our wildest dreams come true. Any day now.

      (Unless it conflicts with the predictions for AI, that it will provide equality and equity for all and decentralize skill, talent and knowledge and make all our wildest dreams come true.)

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 days ago

    Yes let’s definitely side with the scam that’s been around for two decades and its only practical use is to rug pull chumps yes this is good advice

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 days ago

        Not even that. It was because a disingenuous psychopath raised a big stink to the payment processors that Steam and itch rely on. As long as they want to process payments they unfortunately need the companies and have to appease them. The best thing we could do is raise a bigger opposite stink.

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          I think the best thing we can do is create long-term alternatives. But I do think that the most reasonable, effective, productive thing we can do is to just collectively harass the credit card companies harder than some outspoken religious nuts do to prevent them from caving to censorship demands.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    If you do not know a lot about “crypto” then I would say the main thing to understand is that there is Bitcoin (not owned by any single entity) and then there is everything else. Other “coins” are owned by corporations that can make decisions about it and change it to some extent. These are extremely risky.

    Bitcoin (btc) does have risk but much less. It is not owned by any company or person or country. It is like the internet, only exists because tens of thousands of internet providers(miners for Bitcoin) around the world make it possible. Bitcoin has, in its codebase, a limitation that any change must be agreed upon by 95% of these providers(miners). This way security patches and bug fixes can be added because everyone agrees those are good. Other harmful changes would never reach 95% agreement therefor could never be implemented. There is a limit of 21 million Bitcoin and this number can never increase unless 95% agree to it… which they never would. This is in stark contrast to normal money which is constantly printed(at random rates depending on who happens to be in control at that moment) so that the supply increases making its value drop.

    Scamming happens with cryptos, Bitcoin, euros, dollars,yuan… and always will.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      What about Ethereum? I always thought Bitcoin was something to avoid since it’s proof-of-work.

      • PropaGandalf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        yeah, to me bitcoin is rather a interesting pioneeing project which now is obsolete. there are a ton of decentralized DLTs that re not bitcoin and not even a blockchain in some cases (like Holochain for example)

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Monero should be used. It’s the only really private/secure coin, although I think it’s proof of work too.

        • I’m really hoping we figure out an alternative to monero that is less energy intensive though. It’s bonkers inefficient compared to other coin to mine, super anonymous though, so trade offs

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Etherium, Solana…etc are the next level of more risky networks. They have distributed upgrade/change protocols as well but are not as decentralized as bitcoin. As for how efficient a coin is, I am not comparing that metric as efficiently does not correlate to risk. This post was just referring to risk.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      there is Bitcoin (not owned by any single entity) and then there is everything else. Other “coins” are owned by corporations that can make decisions about it and change it to some extent. These are extremely risky.

      What? Just ridiculous misinformation. Every coin but BTC is owned by corporations? Huh?

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        True, controlled by corporations or individuals except a few. XRP is an example of a coin that could be drastically changed and the coin owners would be left in the cold.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Doesn’t work for online stuff. This is probably referencing how steam was recently forced to can a bunch of its porn games to appease payment processors.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 days ago

    If you’re gonna pick a cryptocurrency, go with the one that actually keeps your identity encrypted, and is intentionally designed to make it unfeasible to farm with a huge crypto mining operation:

    Monero.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Why would a malicious malware botnet dev choose to mine a more difficult to mine, and thus less profitable crypto currency, when their botnet could instead be mining a much more profitable coin with their botnet?

        I won’t argue that ransomware often asks for payment in monero, because monero is actually difficult to track and deanonymize, but ransomware and a distributed mining botnet are not the same thing.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          They wouldn’t? Monero is more profitable for botnets than bitcoin because it (deliberately) doesn’t require specialized hardware.

          Who was talking about ransomware? Maybe I’m missing some context here.