• v01dworks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    lol I was so confused by Firefox not needing to restart that I tried running update again and then closed it myself because I thought something went wrong

  • cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Good to know that I am not the only one mistaking Cr1TiKaL aka MoistCr1TiKaL aka penguinz0 aka Charles Christopher White Jr. as Asmongold aka Zack Hoyt (the rightwing influencer).

  • hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Charlie’s still using that gamer version of Opera though. With the fake key stroke sounds enabled.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I miss the days when it was normal to just shut down the pc when you were done with it. Leaving things on all of the time isn’t healthy.

  • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Getting rid of that forced restart will at least help me personally stay more secure and get bug fixes faster

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or you can just opt out if you don’t think Mozilla should have this data which is strictly about the browser and whether it’s the default browser, and which in no way compromises any personal info.

      Just because something uses telemetry doesn’t mean it’s used in a way that compromises your personal data.
      Google, Microsoft, Facebook and many others do that, Mozilla/Firefox does not.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You probably missed the news. But Firefox is becoming a data seller too.

        Recently they updated their policies, since they are on GitHub you can see the exact changes.

        One of them was the elimination of a phrase like “we won’t sell your data, and that’s a promise”. So promise broken I guess.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You probably missed the news.

          No I did not, but did you ever stop to wonder why there is so much anti Firefox propaganda, as Google is trying to prevent ad-blockers?

          Manage technical and interaction data collection settings in Firefox:
          https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/technical-and-interaction-data

          What is technical and interaction data?:
          https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/technical-and-interaction-data#w_what-is-technical-and-interaction-data

          information about how Firefox functions on your device and how you use its features. This includes performance details like page load times, and memory usage, as well as insights into which Firefox features you interact with, such as bookmarks, tabs or settings. Additionally, it collects general device information, including your operating system, browser version and hardware specifications. Mozilla uses this data to enhance Firefox while respecting your privacy.

          There is zero, zip, zilch, nada personalo info collected.
          So please point out to me which of these it is that worries you?
          Also please point out which of these it is you think Mozilla would be able to sell?

          Firefox is becoming a data seller too.

          I think that technically that is libel!

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It is not propaganda as it is factual information. If you believe this is 4D chess from Google to manipulate us to dislike Firefox you are out of your mind. https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e this is an actual commit made by mozilla. It was not made by Google.

            Changes include:

            • Removing “we don’t sell access to your data”. Curiously this change is only for the TOU. Presumable because that is legally binding. Idk where the “else” branch is displayed though.
            • Removing this question from FAQ: “Does Firefox sell your personal data? Nope. Never has, never will (…). That’s a promise”
            • Remove another mention in the TOU “and we don’t sell your personal data”. That again was not removed from the “else” branch

            That to me indicates one of the following:

            • They have started selling data.
            • They plan on selling data in the near future.
            • They don’t feel confident that they can keep that promise forever. That is, they see a future where they sell data.

            I don’t like either of those alternatives.

            I don’t know if they are able to sell the data you mentioned. Because I’m not in the enshittification minds of giant American corporations. 20 years ago people would laugh at the idea of buying data about the screen size of a user. But now they do, and use it for fingerprinting. If recent history has shown anything is that most data has some kind of value. And giant corporations will find their way to use that data against users.

            I’ve seen way too many companies that were supposed to be the cool kids and were doing everything morally enshittify. There’s no reason to believe Mozilla is going to be different. They’re showing the same signs.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I never claimed they didn’t remove those lines.
              But your screen size is NOT personal info.

              Also this line was in my previous post:

              Mozilla uses this data to enhance Firefox while respecting your privacy.

              So how do you imagine selling personal data is respecting privacy?
              Again what you are doing could be libel, you have zero evidence to back up your claim, it’s pure speculation.

  • Sidhean@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    to be fair, i thought asmongold and penguinz0 were the same person, and that cr1tikal was a seperate, equally shit-headed person. My poor brain-- so the “woo lets go baby” guy is a decent dude? and its the other guy that has a rat corpse alarm clock? or am i still confused?

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The differences are astonishing Asmongold is pretty much a gaming and bad takes second hand streamer. Whose only identity is kissing right wing politician’s ass, even when they actively hate and attack him.

        Then Charlie is there with movie and music credits, anime and comics productions, podcasts, business ventures, and also streaming. With every single of his political takes and controversies being morally and ethically sound and consistent.

        They are like Superman and bizarro, mirror images of each other, similar but opposites at the same time.

        Oh, and asswithmold face is the most punchable face on the internet (second only to PirateSoftware’s) while Charlie’s is sculpted by the gods themselves.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can tell, almost double the tabs and still no system crash ! I think it’s just discard tabs more aggressively but still, that’s better than crashing