• stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 days ago

      just so people are aware, this is FIFTH TIME the administration has done this: Source

      If this sounds at all familiar, it’s not your imagination. In March, the Republican administration announced that it had agreed to pay a foreign company almost $1 billion in American taxpayer money to abandon two wind farm projects that would have produced enough electricity to power more than 1.3 million homes and businesses […]

      At the administration’s insistence, the company will instead proceed with different energy projects that will cost more and pollute more. [thanks to] President Donald Trump, many American consumers will pay for the privilege of paying more to turn on the lights, all while polluting our own air.

      Then in April, it happened again, when the Republican administration announced plans to pay energy companies almost $900 million to abandon plans for two offshore wind farms. Two months later, Team Trump spent $765 million to buy back another group of offshore wind leases.

      In late June, a fourth example emerged, when the administration announced plans to pay Duke Energy $129 million to abandon an offshore wind project off the coast of North Carolina.

      With a fifth instance this week, the combined price tag for the developments is approaching $4 billion.

    • mecen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I wonder if that company earned more from being banned from making wind turbines or would be from selling electricity

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        “After careful consideration, it was determined there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future,” the company said in a statement.

        From the article it looks like this wasn’t just a carrot being dangled but also a stick being threatened. My guess is that they foresaw the path to completion would be too fraught under the United States government as it is and they don’t see any point in fighting an unwinnable war when they can just get paid anyhow.

        The long and short of it is that Germany and Europe as well as the rest of the world at this point sees no point in investing in America’s future because we have none.

        • mecen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Well yes but they earned money from anti windmill administration and I wondered how long would this farm would need to work to earn it back

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    16 days ago

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies”.

    Thank god we’re not paying costly subsidies

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      16 days ago

      $1.2 Billion to make a project not happen sounds like a pretty costly subsidy.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 days ago

        They are being paid $1.2B to build gas power projects in the US. Whereas before they were being paid to build wind power in the US. They are not being paid to do nothing.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          16 days ago

          Are you sure? Because wording isn’t clear, but pay out sounds like a … pay out, not ‘please, build something else’. 🤷

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              16 days ago

              Yes, which is not what you said before. RWE is getting paid for nothing to then invest its own money in other projects. The difference is ownership. The difference matters.

              • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                From what I can tell, RWE would have owned the wind projects before as well.

                RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight.

                They wouldn’t need to relinquish leases if the US was the owner and RWE was simply a contractor building stuff for them.

                • Jiral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Your interpretation doesn’t sound like the only possible one. Do you have a source that is clearly stating these things?

                • ywain@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  That’s 1.2 billion - 900 million, and still a profit making venture. Paid by the US government to still make money. US capitalism.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          No they aren’t. They are investing in gas power projects, but the US government is not paying them the money to do that. The money is solely for breach of contract regarding the wind power project.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 days ago

      The US could switch off their nuclear powerplants to accelerate the transition to hydrocarbons.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          They already know. Merkel saved their oil industry by making electricity for cars expensive.

          • Thorry@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yeah but what if Germany were to be hit by a 9.1 earthquake followed by a huge tsunami and have the disaster cause the need for emergency generators that were flooded by the tsunami? We can’t have that risk! Shutting down all nuclear reactors was the only option.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        Normally, I am very pro nuclear. The Trump Regime has proven itself to be utterly shit at wielding every form of power known to mankind, be it soft, wind, or kinetic. 😒

    • Starya67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      They’d already spent that billion on preparations. If they hadn’t received their money back the shit would have hit the fan.

    • Sprossnix@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Only if you reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

  • Mereo@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is incredibly stupid. While China and the rest of the world are leading the charge in renewable energy, the U.S. is set to remain in the Stone Age due to pure hubris and short-term profit gains.

    Paying 1.2 billion to get rid of that technology is just ideologically short-sighted. It’s simply stupid.

    • ywain@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Exactly, European energy generation during an extreme summer has shown that renewables are the most reliable, until systems are in place for storage. The world can’t rely on fossil fuels or even nuclear at the moment due to climate change.

  • deeferg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    16 days ago

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies”.

    I actually want to vomit from how stupid as fuck that whole country is to not have done anything to these people.

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    1.2 billion of free money to not do work. Wow the trump administration sure knows how to waist money.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    If I was president I would order every new wind turbine be planted out side every trump golf course in the United states. 6 per golf course and tackey hotel

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    They are getting paid $1.2B to build other power projects in the US. Not to simply do nothing.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      That is a false statement. The US government paid them money for breaching the contract for the wind power project. The company is then investing some of that money in other projects in the US (which seems like a stupid decision, considering the unreliability of the country, but that is capitalism for you).