The state’s ban on gender-affirming pediatric care “cannot be justified” by science, a two-year review concluded.
Doesn’t matter, they’ll ignore it or write it off as leftist propaganda despite being the ones that ordered the study. They don’t need reasons to hate as long as it keeps the sheep voting for them.
When Roald Reagan pushed tax cuts for the rich George W. Bush called it ‘voo-doo economics.’
In almost five decades, the taxcuts have never paid for themselves as reagan promised.
Funny since they both were propped up by the heritage foundation.
As Henry Ford said of the Model T. “You can get it any color you want, as long as it’s black.”
You can have any candidate you want, as long as it’s a Conservative.
*regressive
They forgot to rig it.
But seriously, the response is disgusting. This is a report you requested, using experts seeking genuine truth. The goal was to improve lives and understand the effects of treatment. There are ethical reasons one could reject a report saying it’s not good, namely bodily autonomy and individual freedom, but when the evidence comes back that you shouldn’t restrict this individual freedom, that’s pretty heinous to do so.
Who would you rather believe, my man-made book about our magical friend in the sky or some stupid data driven peer reviewd scientific study?
I mean, it isn’t as though politicians are above fabricating a bunch of medicalized Trans bigotry. The UK’s Cass Report is one such example.
What’s amazing is that Utah’s researchers did the leg work properly, rather than conducting a series of FOX News style interviews and Steven Crowder inspired trolling.
Wait Nazis aren’t rational and just?
Well they more I hear about them, the less I like em.
Since when did Republicans give a rats ass about science?
In the off-chance it doesn’t totally disprove them.
“hey we didn’t say anything about science… did you guys order the wrong kind of study? i meant like bible study”
