Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agoNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1759
arrow-up1759imageNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comDazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareportuga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·3 months agoPhysics would be a lot simpler if all cows were spherical
minus-squarelate_list@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoI’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
minus-squaredalekcaan@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoYeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 months agoEfficiently packing 17 square cows.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoThis is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again! flips syrup table and leaves
minus-squareotter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoCertainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoI can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out
Physics would be a lot simpler if all cows were spherical
Me, an engineer: They aren’t?
I’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again!
flips syrup table and leaves
Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out