Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1756
arrow-up1756imageNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comDazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squarelate_list@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
minus-squaredalekcaan@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoYeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoEfficiently packing 17 square cows.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThis is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again! flips syrup table and leaves
minus-squareotter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoCertainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out
I’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again!
flips syrup table and leaves
Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out