• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    3.5: Expertly dodge Surface-to-Air Missile in your airborne tanker boat.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    People keep saying they can’t dig a channel because there are mountains there…

    But couldn’t we airlift the ships? Drones today are incredibly capable.

  • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    what’s the action in the gambling markets look like for how long until Trump publicly says “and by the way folks, it’s not straight, it turns, they should call it the Turn of Hormuz”

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Well, we could nuke Antarctica.

      That… might actually cause something approximately like that, if you threw the entire US nuclear arsenal at it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        If you’re going to be using nukes like that, you might as well Operation Plowshare yourself a canal directly instead.

        (Sorry in advance if this is too credible.)

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          “Operation Glass Cannon”

          EDIT:

          Well, I put my glasses on and looked at the original image again…

          Nuking a canal into… out of… ??? … that section of the Arabian penninsula would have the benefit of not causing the Noachian Deluge Round 2 for all of Iraq.

          So that’s probably a plus, for the nuclear infrastructure engineering plan.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Geez, now I really want to see an XKCD What If style explanation of what horrors would befall us if there were two giant portals at different points in the ocean. Especially if it was like, the Atlantic and the Pacific.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Depends on the “different points” and how you define their positions:

      • If they were “at sea level” meaning average sea level, water would flow in one and out the other depending on which level was actually higher at that moment due to tides etc.

      • If they were “at sea level” meaning the actual level of the sea at that point at that moment, it’d be a pretty boring result because no water would flow.

      • If one portal were at significant depth, the high pressure would cause a strong stream to spray out of the other portal. If it were also underwater itself or at the surface pointed horizontally, it would create a strong current. If it were at or near the surface pointed up, a fountain or geyser. If it were pointed at the shore or bottom, it would carve a canyon. Also, a whirlpool might form at the surface above the inlet portal.

      Finally, in any of the above cases various marine life might be transferred between locations, potentially exacerbating problems with invasive species or causing an algae bloom or something like that.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I was imagining potential weather-related upsets due to temperature differentials and tides and things, but that would likely require very large portals. Maybe a better / more interesting question is, how large would the portals have to be for this to start having this types of effects?

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    That cake … is a lie.

    This is the actual cake from Portal:

    And no, neurotoxins are not on the menu.

    Did not exactly get rave reviews back in the 80s.