YouTube viewers will soon have to sit through even longer ads, with Google rolling out new 30-second unskippable spots on a popular app.

    • dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      I just purchased a new travel router that will have options for ad blocking built in. Would that block ads on any device sharing that connexion? TV, phone, PC, smart fridge,…?

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        8 months ago

        Those will not block YT ads.

        They’ll block ads at a DNS level, but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

        • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          Those will not block YT ads.

          This is correct

          but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

          This is false

            • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sure, but that can be said about almost anything.

              Still, I’d be surprised if they went the route of embedding ads into the stream, in part because of measurability/skipability/etc. It’s definitely not out of the question, but I think we’re still ways to go before we get there.

              And even then, tools like yt-dlp would probably be able to apply some heuristics to figure out which segments are foreign to the stream and slice them out that way. Blocking yt-dlp would require DRM, which in turn requires changing the transcoding pipeline in a pretty non-trivial way. I also doubt they would willingly go this route.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            And the reason is that those ad-blockers are based on DNS block lists, and YouTube ads are served by the same servers that also serve videos.

        • ragas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Youtubes ads are not delivered into the videostream. That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

          • diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Why would you need to re encode when you can literally pause one stream swap in the ad and then swap back in the paused one in the same response

            • ragas@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              Exactly. Instead of editing within the video stream you just switch to a second stream.

              However from youtubes perspective that has the downside that the switching logic is where adblockers can hook in to block the ads.

          • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

            You actually don’t have to, on account of how adaptive video streaming works. It’s fully possible to serve a few segments of ad content mid-stream.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not youtube ads, sadly, if they are blocking based on domain names. For YouTube, you can use pipepipe, which do block ads as far as I have seen.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    8 months ago

    Firefox with ublock origin for desktop and mobile. Grayjay for mobile (integrates Nebula too so you can get both your feeds at once). Android TV with FCast and Smart Tube Next for your TV. Never see ads again.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        8 months ago

        They keep trying. The adblockers keep winning. I’ve had my fair share of videos sometimes not loading, or regularly needing to update apps to keep up with Google’s latest bullshit, but the minor glitches and headaches are worth it for all the time I don’t spend staring at a greyed out skip button.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          Pretty sure several engineers from google itself might be contributors to some of them, fortunately.

        • Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          All you have to do is close the window every time they try that bullshit and that shows up in stats. Get enough people doing it and they’ll back off

        • chunes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The one thing I like them for is nostalgic songs. Almost always a great vibe in the comments

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If I want to see the comment section I use official app, and just pause the ad.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I know they are trying but so far it seems the ad-blockers are winning because I’ve not noticed any interruptions or problems with comments so far.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone else in this thread mentioned TizenTube, that sounds like what you’re looking for.

        But personally I just grabbed an Nvidia Shield. It works great and if you swap out the default launcher you’ll never see a single ad on it (with the right apps). Plus the pro is beefy enough to run some decent emulators too.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I run both those and I see ads every time google breaks ublock which is monthly now. Grayjay is broken more than its not at this point and requires like 10+ tries with various ciphers.

      I think the day of these ads becoming unblockable is coming soon.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you running Ublock on Chrome or Firefox? It works significantly better on Firefox. I’ve never seen an ad get through it.

        • Auth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Firefox. Google does AB testing so they roll out the anti adblocking changes ot some users. Its usually effective at blocking adblocker for a day or two. Sometimes i have to watch the Ad sometimes i have to sit and stare at a black screen for 15seconds.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh, excellent, I’ll be checking that out right away. I have an iPad that I’m stuck with from work and it’d be great to get ad free YouTube there.

    • hogmomma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Smart Tube is useless for me. Takes forever to load the video and usually craps in the process. Pass.

      • YellaLeber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you have a weird network/Google TV setup? I run it on a stock nvidia shield with no pihole or anything and I’ve never had any issues with smart tube, it’s great.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    I often entirely forget that youtube and most of the internet is plagued with ads. It’s a shock to use a family member’s phone or laptop that does not have adblock

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Internet is practically unusable without adblock. Rawdogging the web you get a postage stamp sized amount of content bordered by flashing ads and video ads. No fuckin thanks homie

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      As a good friend and son, I of course installed unlock origin for them. Even the light version in Chrome if I have to. Their phones I did not touch though.

    • bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My computer is covered, but which app is safe to block ads on my phone?

      On my phone it’s not just the ads that aggravate but also the autoplay videos–the ones that follow you as you scroll down. I can’t prevent them from autoplaying.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mobile firefox is compatible with desktop addons, so you can still use ublock origin on your phone. I also use pihole to cover my whole local network and wireshark to VPN my phone to my local network when out of the house. If you’re on iPhone you’re probably just out of luck.

        I generally do everything in-browser and do not use any other mobile apps, so no youtube app, etc.

        This is the first I’ve ever heard of following autoplay videos lol

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s so fucking funny though. I would love to pay YouTube. But I will never pay a company that abuses my data the way they do.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s that, but I’d also like to point out, that as a paying customer, you’re still force fed that bottom tier slop with no way to filter it other than hoping some combination of reporting/not interested/don’t show me this channel again works.

      But even if you say, not to recommend a channel, it can still show up. So you get to pay for low grade AI slop videos. Or “content farms” that take 2 videos and just splice them together for some reason (both horizontal and vertical). Or the “I’m just going to stare at the camera and do nothing while I play a video that’s from another platform”. Like it’s endless.

      The “shorts” platform is pure garbage. Can I turn shorts off? No I can “show fewer shorts”.

      So you pay, to not get ads. They sell ALL your data to double dip (since they selling your data anywho) and there’s no benefit for the content. They have all this data, all this tech, and the platform is rot with shit.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s true. I guess I would only pay for a YouTube that is actually useful. “People want to block channels. Best we can do is ‘I am not interested’ and still show them.”

      • VoiHyvaLuojaMitaNyt@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The “shorts” platform is pure garbage. Can I turn shorts off? No I can “show fewer shorts”.

        Once again the pirate version (revanced) of youtube is better than the actual paid version. Revanced and ublock filter take care of shorts for me. Haven’t seen them in months

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d be willing to get YouTube Premium just to get rid of ads, but they’re bundling it with YouTube Music and I’m not trusting Google with my music purchases any more, thank you.

      They discontinued Google Play Music (fortunately only after a long long period of time allowing you to download MP3s with their bloody terrible client app, so no loss there) and told me that you can just import the purchases to YouTube Music. Which I couldn’t actually access.

      Also I don’t want a music streaming service, I just want to buy the albums. It’s pretty sad that it seems the only remaining feasible local option for electronic music purchases is iTunes! Bloody iTunes!

    • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      you gladly feed them your viewing habits to increase their value to their shareholders though 🤷

      you aren’t hurting their bottom line by not watching ads. You’re just making a tiny dent into a single line of thousands on some slides on the evp of youtube’s quarterly presentation. No one else notices.

      Your data and viewing habits and patterns and all of the device info you leak and broadcast? The wifi signals your phone is always seeing? Oh that bluetooth device that just rode past your apartment while your blocking ads on youtube? Definitely not being seen by them. Apps are spyware these days, and they are spying on everything

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My main point is that if it wasn’t a privacy destroying capitalist evil company and website, that it would provide enough possible value for me to want to pay. My data is one of the reasons it isn’t, I was merely answering to the article and context here.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    I recommend Peertube. There’s not much there yet, but myself and others are trying.

    Also, did you know you can upload your video to Peertube and have YouTube pull it via RSS? That’s what I’m doing!

    All of my stuff you’ll find on Peertube and I don’t have to do anything else to get it up on YouTube.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This is a terrible take, as most content creators I watch already cannot survive off of Youtube ad revenue and rely on third-party monetization, like Patreon subscriptions.

        Besides the fact that plenty of people make content for free, from the simple love of creating something.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t think it had prerolls during the flash days but it had banner ads as far back as I can remember

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well, no. It’s been losing money for years. But I doubt this will make it profitable.

            • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              People started doing it professionally when the ad money came in. Before that people did it for the love of the content, and it was lower production quality, but better content.

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        NoBOdY wIlL dO AnYThiNg wItHOuT PrOfiT mOtIvE

        This book, YouTube’s history, and the span of human history say otherwise. You’re spouting capitalist rhetoric which is ultimately a lie told to us on repeat to encourage greed, selfishness, and individualism.

        The platform you’re using right now was built without profit motive, there’s plenty of content. PeerTube can achieve the same.

      • NKBTN@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        People will create plenty of content for free. Basically every blog, early YT video and all of Wikipedia was made by people who just like creating stuff for free

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lots of people did it on YouTube for years. Even more on other platforms.

      • ozoned@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m creating content and YouTube pulls from my Peertube. So I’ll never lose it. All of these content creators are leaning on Patreon as none of them can count on ad revenue anymore. So people are already doing it.

        And Peer tube will never fully replace YouTube, but also, it doesn’t have to. Your local library, school, church, community space, doesn’t need ad revenue.

      • sp3ctre@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are already some youtubers linking to their patreon because their content gets demonetized frequently (shiey, gifgas).

        I think this could be the way to go. Instead of patreon, liberapay could also be used.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Someone who don’t want to lose their emails… In https://lemmy.cafe/comment/15974964 it was mentioned that their entire google account got banned for 10 years over adblocking youtube. I stopped watching youtube immediately… I’m not about to watch ads, but I don’t want to lose access to my 22 year old personal account… So many accounts are tied to that address, that I can’t manage to move to a different service.

      FML what happened to “do no evil”? Now it’s “make money with the baby grinding machine for all costs”

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Me on (android) TV. On PC I have ad blocker. On TV ads time is between 6 seconds and 1 minute. Sometimes ads contain AI slop. 💀

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    I set my VPN to Albania. Ads on YouTube are banned in Albania.

    On the web, I be Albanian.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      Remember that some people voluntarily pay for TV and streaming with ads.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had been paying for it a while ago since, to be fair, the service is free otherwise and often times it pays the creator more. Then Youtube decided to give about $45mil or so worth of energy toward making pro-Israel content and suddenly I didn’t mind the ads so much anymore. Now they’re making it a lot worse and my solution is going to need to be an adblocker.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    Youtube: “People are blocking are ads and costing us money, what should we do?!”

    The People: “Police your platform and stop advertising scams, hate speech, pornography, and all the other shit.”

    Youtube: “I just have no idea what to do, so I guess I’ll just invest millions/billions into making ads harder to block, and make the ads longer and unskippable. You know, Just make the platform almost completely unusable without adblocking”

    The People: “YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO, JUST POLICE YOUR FUCKING PLATFORM ALREADY. IF YOU DID YOU WOULDNT NEED TO DO ALL THIS SHIT”

    Youtube: “Oh, btw, heres another PragerU video thats 3 hours long and talks about how the black man should be grateful for the white man uplifting them via slavery, followed by a ad thats basically a woman fingering herself to advertise chinese AI girlfriends”

    The People: adblocking intensifies

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s the craziest part isn’t it? All of this data collection so they can build profiles of us, and then they just don’t apply any of it to ads.

      I don’t like watching ads, but it would at least be slightly more tolerable if I got ads for things I actually wanted. On my TV I watch YT unfortunately not adblocked, and never once have I seen an ad for anything that appeal to me.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      YouTube does police their platform, they curate it for babies and remove anything critical of the government

    • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah it doesn’t matter what ads they’d have or how well they police their site. I’d block them regardless.

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Might just be my account but YouTube algorithms got so sensitive I’m afraid to watch random crap, I watch like 1 video about a topic then for a week that’s all I get.

          But yeah it’s more for intentional viewing than watching random crap, but I saw that as a bonus feature as it led to me procrastinating less.

          • VoiHyvaLuojaMitaNyt@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            lol I have no idea if it works, but if I watch a random video, I delete it from the watch history because I fear that if I don’t, the algo will go bonkers. So far it seems to work though lol

        • dorkage@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is what I found.

          With Nebula and CuriosityStream, most of the things I follow are still on YouTube.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Speedrunners unfortunately use YouTube and twitch only. So it’s pick your cancer on that front.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        At least twitch is a bit different than YouTube in that the culture there it’s normal for people to pay and donate to streamers. Even though the owners still suck massively, of course

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Make sure to sign up via a creator’s link! (the ones they’ll put in the sponsored section of a video where they are “sponsored” by Nebula as one of Nebula’s creators)

            Gets you a pretty good discount and drops it to about 30 bucks a year.