Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
No there never was. There was a threat to pissrahelli settlers sure, but I don’t consider a threat to terrorists terrorism. I perfectly understood you’re commenr from the beginnig. You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it’s stolen land.
Removed by mod
Mask off moment. Never argue with a liberal, it’s a complete waste of time
Removed by mod
Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It’s always the same story. I see a “tankie” citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It’s embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you’re not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what’s the point?
Removed by mod
No there never was. There was a threat to pissrahelli settlers sure, but I don’t consider a threat to terrorists terrorism. I perfectly understood you’re commenr from the beginnig. You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it’s stolen land.
Removed by mod
you mean the ones that were mostly killed by the iof? I simply wouldn’t have partied next to modern day auschwitz. Complete skill isue.
Removed by mod
Doesn’t make any of the pissrahellisbombs justified. Also tell thatto the iof that murdered most of them
Removed by mod
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rkjqoobip
Removed by mod