This is the question posed on CityNerd video titled “Walkable Cities But They Keep Getting More Affordable

If you ditched your car, could you afford to leave the suburbs for a great urban neighborhood?

Ray Delahanty answers the question in the 26 biggest US cities.

The analysis assumes the all-in cost of owning and operating a car is $1,000 per month, including purchase, insurance, fuel, and maintenance.

In the city, transportation costs might total about $250 per month for transit passes, biking, ride-hailing, and other small expenses.

This results in an effective $750 per month increase in the housing budget for city center residents who do not own a car.

The results of the video are quite interesting, as you can get more m² in walkable areas in most cities

  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nope I would have to triple or quadruple my costs for housing to move to an urban environment. Also then I would be surrounded by other people in close proximity a lot of the time. Currently I pay less than 1k/mo for mortgage, and there’s only about 3 or less people per acre of land surrounding me. Costs for 1 car amount to roughly $800/mo including payment, insurance, and fuel.

    • Pungent Llama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      You may not need a car in the urban environment. Of course it would depend on the city. If it was Tokyo, a big yes for me. You’ll get less space but being able to walk to get everything I need is going to be good for my health in the long term.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I would be surrounded by other people in close proximity a lot of the time

      If this is a con for you instead of a pro, you may be lost.

  • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    1000 a month for owning and operating a car seems like a lot. Maybe i am out of touch because we own our car outright, but its not nearly that expensive for us. Even with a parking spot rental.

    I live in an awesome urban neighborhood, and still wouldnt want to be without the car. I dont use it when it doesnt make sense, but ive lived both with and without, and with is worlds better. Grocery shopping (especially at places like Costco) is much easier. Errands that would be an all day affair without the car become a few hours affair. Friends and family across the city are much easier to see. Things like that.

    Dont get me wrong, i love a walkable neighborhood with a walkable downtown. Its why i dont live in a suburb abomination. When it makes more sense to use PT I use it. But life is better with the car overall. Its not a zero sun game. We can have both. And bike lanes. And pedestiran plazas. Etc.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean it’s not crazy IMO, running cost is probably 500 but depreciation is a major factor. A rule of thumb is around 10-15% of the value of the car each year so if you can sell yours now for 35000 depreciation is in the range of 300-400 a month. Older cars have a lower depreciation but higher maintenance. Then also not applicable in your case is financing cost which varies a lot.

      In your case I’d look at how much just paying for a taxi for Costco and full day rental for day trips would cost compared to owning a car.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          But did you factor in all the other things like insurance, oil changes, car washes, property tax for owning a driveway and public street maintenance?

        • Caveman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I see, I was under the impression that you didn’t use it for work as in walking/biking/public transport instead.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      1000 seems like a lot, but you need to factor in insurance, cost of parking, repurchasing fule, windshield washer fluids, oils, cabin air filters, car washes, heated seat subscriptions. It all adds up quickly.

      And I know I must be missing stuff in this list as well like maintenance and depreciation of the vehicle as well.

      Also parking costs are generally subsidized with city taxes for on street parking, but owning a condo or home with a driveway you could be looking at property tax attached to your home, and in a condo you may need to purchase the parking spot as a separate property.

    • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Maybe i am out of touch because we own our car outright, but its not nearly that expensive for us. Even with a parking spot rental.

      Try adding in the cost of depreciation and it makes a lot more sense. I owned a used car for 10 years and didn’t commute using it for most of that time, so it didn’t even rack up that many miles. It still cost me over $500/month on average over that time period including depreciation, maintenance, gas, registration, and insurance. I’m sure it would be a lot more if I drove as much as the average american. Though I think the average is probably somewhat skewed towards the most expensive cars.

      Needless to say I am now happily car free. $500/month can buy me a very nice ebike, as well as more taxis or hourly car rentals than I need.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Between parking, gas, insurance, and maintenance 500 is more within the realm of reason.

        Yeha if you were hardly using it then why have the extra expense? In my family its used daily (mostly for work commute to a poorly connected by PT workplace). More than worth it for the conveniance and lifestyle it enables

        • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yes I think I probably should have sold it as soon as I stopped using it to commute. I was mostly just ignorant of all the alternatives to car ownership. Car ownership is not worth it in my opinion unless you truly need to use it several days out of the week every week. And people should be doing pretty much everything they can to avoid being in that situation.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Well we do live in a city neighborhood and don’t have to drive much.

    Car insurance on two cars not used daily $400/month here, gas immaterial. But the cost of the cars (paid off) was so much money, if spread over a 15 year life (mine will go longer maybe, but that’s unusual) would add another $125 each, so $650 plus gas and maintenance (less maintenance cost because cars were bought pretty new).

    My daily commuter is a good electric bike, $2,000 plus electricity (I could charge it at work tho) and maintenance. I don’t know how long they last, so can’t estimate a per month but insurance for a year costs less than one car costs for a month.

    Transit pass here about $50 a month. But buses are terribly infrequent.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    More dense urban areas certainly should be more affordable than suburban or rural areas, but they’re often not. Or at least not as much as they could be.

    One reason is I think many suburban and rural areas are being subsidized by urban areas, by using urban tax revenue to pay for suburban infrastructure.

    But I think the biggest reason is that urban areas are often in much higher demand, because that’s where most of the jobs and housing are located, but the supply of housing is simply insufficient to meet the demand, thus driving up housing prices. And other prices, too. There’s a supply demand imbalance for a lot of things in many higher density urban areas. And part of that is by design. The “suppliers” of homes, that is landlords, don’t want to oversupply the market with housing, relative to demand, because that will push down rents, and they want rents to be as high as possible, because rents are their source of revenue.

    Until urban areas find ways to significantly increase the supply of housing relative to the demand, housing prices in those urban areas will remain higher than they could, or should be. Non-car transportation infrastructure also needs to be significantly improved in many urban areas, but that takes money. Money that many urban residents either don’t want to pay, or can’t pay because so much of their income is going to housing, and other costs of living. Edit: Plus, these infrastructure projects are often poorly managed by politicians, causing cost over runs and long delays.

    Finally, there’s a social/cultural element to this that almost no one talks about because it’s seen as problematic or taboo. People don’t necessarily want to be surrounded on all sides by people they don’t consider to be a part of their cultural or ethnic group. I’m sorry, I know, reading that makes a lot of people’s butt holes clinch, but it’s true. I think people would be much more willing to live in more densely populated urban areas if the people in these areas were more like them (culturally, ethnically). You can choose not to believe that because it makes you uncomfortable, but, uncomfortable though it may be, I think it is nonetheless true.

    Edit: I want to add that I think there is also a class element to this, in addition to the cultural/ethnic element. Many people move out to the suburbs because they don’t want to be around people they see as being of a “lower class” than them. Edit, again: also, where there are higher rates of poverty in urban areas, there are often higher crime rates. Many urban areas are often very unequal, with wealthier areas that are better maintained with better schools, very near much poorer areas that are more poorly maintained with worse schools.

    Final edit: so, for better urban areas we need: to stop using urban tax revenue to subsidize suburban infrastructure. We need to significantly increase the supply of housing relative to demand, even perhaps oversupplying housing to drive housing costs down as much as possible. We need better non-car infrastructure and better leadership to better manage the building and maintenance of that infrastructure. We need to reduce poverty and inequality in urban areas as much as possible. If we do those things across all urban areas, I think the ethnic and cultural issues will work themselves out.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plus I prefer having complete ownership of my home. Not relying on neighbours to co-own the building with me or being reliant on a landlord to perform repairs and approve simple things like a window air conditioner. Sounds like hell to me.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    My monthly cost of living, all-in, is $2000/month. It was a little more when I was raising my kid. And now, it’s more than it would have been had we not had skyrocketing inflation for the past five years.

    If that sounds low, it is. But, I’m old (60) and my mortgage, which is almost paid off, is, and has been for nearly 30 years, $800/mo.

    I paid $6000 cash for my current car, nine years ago. Since then, it’s been insurance, gas, oil changes, and one shop visit. Nothing like $1000/mo.

    If you think I’m an outlier, I’m not. By definition, half of people pay less than the average.

    If people didn’t drive gas-fueled trucks and cars through the middle of cities, then the air would be cleaner, and the city would be quieter. But, people DO drive trucks and cars through cities, and the air is dirty, and the city is noisy.

    No, I could not afford to live in a city with decent public transportation, and it has nothing to do with transportation. Nor, do I want to live in a big city, the way they are now, and are likely to be for the rest of my life.

    You can hate me for being old and for any other reason you want to, but I sincerely hope you get to live as long as I have, and much longer than that.

    And, yes, I agree, fuck cars.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you ditched your car, could you afford to leave the suburbs for a great urban neighborhood?

    Could I afford it? Yes. Would I do it? No.

    I live on a suburban cul-de-sac where my kids can go outside and ride bikes with the neighbors. Also my wife is handicapped, so a car is kind of essential for her. When we lived in an apartment the long walk from the garage to our door was difficult for her.

    Other than those things, I’d much prefer to live in a walkable city. Maybe when I retire, if we can find the right place.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ive watched this and many times its actually a collar burb that has the end of the transit system or far from the center to get the affordability. Im not complaining its basically what I have done but oh man it annoys me that the dense city center is not the most affordable area. Feel like we should be able to keep on building high rises till its the most affordable type of housing and do it mix with shops on at street level while we are at it with a few floors of office.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I couldn’t afford to live in my great, walkable urban neighborhood if I was also paying for a car, that’s for sure.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Question I have for city dwellers. What do grocery trips look like? I’ve only ever lived in the suburbs and I’ve always been interested. Do you bring it all on the subway? Go more then once a week? Walk it home in a cart? Eat out more instead?

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you dont have a car, you just go more often getting smaller amounts of stuff. Or you bring a cart. Grocery stores are more freqent, but smaller.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I stop by the grocery store on the way home and grab ingredients for dinner. I can fit a weeks worth of groceries on my bike but I tend to just go like 3 times per week on average.

      I can’t imagine needing to plan for a whole week of food at a time tbh. Being close to the store means I can just grab whatever I am in the mood for on a given day. Do you just force yourself to eat what you have at home even if you aren’t feeling it that day?

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        All the time. Often just to get it out of the fridge. A lot goes to waste though as fresh fruit and veggies just don’t last.

        Lots more frozen meats. But at the same time I’ll make something new just cause those are the ingredients I have.

    • cia0312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      My nearest supermarket is is a 3 minute walk away. I walk to the supermarket. We probably shop 3-4 times a week.

      Buy food to cover 2 dinners and breakfast. Lunch is leftovers from previous dinner. I have a small fridge, so I can’t fit a week’s worth of food in there anyway.

      Oh, and we transport everything in a backpack and / or shopping bags (with handles, only seen those paper bags without handles in American films).

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      All of the above, depending on exact conditions

      • when I was entirely without a car, I just walked. I was single so carrying groceries usually worked ok. As a first Thanksgiving when I got married I Walked to the grocery like 5 times for all the stiff we needed and didn’t think of ahead of time
      • I saw plenty of people with carts and tried that a few times
      • I briefly tried delivery
      • I saw people using taxis - I didn’t realize at the time but many of them compromised by walking to and taxiing back
      • I have usually had a car though, even if groceries was my only weekly trip (plus occasional needs)

      Actually now that I live in an urban suburb, I could do a lot without a car but carrying groceries is not worth the fight to find an alternate way

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can fit 2 paper bags of groceries in my bike basket. There is not a grocery on my short commute route or I would go on the way home. But really I can haul a few days stuff in the bike if I want to.

      The car was essential when the kids were little, but as a couple the e-bike does more of the heavy lifting.

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you ditched your car, could you afford to leave the suburbs for a great urban neighborhood?

    Actually, yes, because that’s exactly what I did about 5 years ago. No regrets 😊