• Creegz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like the look of these but I would much rather to not use Android again. It appears that they’re trying to port Ubuntu Touch over and the Postmarket wiki shows some functionality is not all there. Interesting to see this coming along though.

  • WormFood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    3 days ago

    my mum bought a fairphone 3 about 5 years ago and is extremely happy with it, so far she’s gone through one usb-c port and one battery. it looks and feels exactly like a normal phone but it pops open with just 4 screws. helping her fix it has taught me that phone manufacturers could make repairable phones easily and they all just choose not to

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      I used to run a small electronics repair business and you are 1 billion percent correct. Slowly watching things over the years become unrepairable was just such an obvious business decision for profit over customer satisfaction. There is absolutely no reason to make those changes unless you have a profit driven motive. So so so many electronics used to be like the fairphone your mom has. Pop it open, take out what’s broke, replace it with some OEM or 3rd party part you bought for like 2 dollars and you’re all set. It’s so frustrating nowadays with how purposefully difficult manufacturers make any repairability. Can’t even change a damn battery in your phone now! lol

      • ThisLucidLens@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I remember the glory days where my alarm would go off for school and I’d just take the battery out of my phone to get it to shut up

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Man I remember when my Mom was actually able to fix a VCR at home with simple tools as well. That VCR lasted as long as sears repaired shops and then they were out of business and the VCR was out for good.

  • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not compatible with Verizon

    Welp, that sucks. I’m not switching to T-Mobile. I’ve seen their infrastructure up close and personal after working on mixed carrier cell towers for years and that shit is absolutely third world by comparison.

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I will have to consider Fairphone when I am looking for my next phone. Looking at their site, my only hesitation is about water resistance. I understand that repairability comes at the cost of making everything glued and sealed shut, but I drop my phone in water once every couple of years. If that risks killing it, it is not going to be a phone that will last long in my hands.

      • TAG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have, but decided against it. I am clumsy and my hands are big enough to barely use my phone one handed (but not hold it securely when I do).

        • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Is it?

          I feel like people have had toddlers and dog bowls for a long time, and that people in the past have been ableto keep certain things away from water successfully. Perhaps if you have increased opportunities to get the phone wet, you should take extra precautions.

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      With an IP55 rating, I would assume it can resist a drop in water. As long as you don’t stare at it for multiple minutes and do get it out asap.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    I want GrapheneOS more than repairability, personally. I hope the Fairphone + GrapheneOS combination is possible some day…

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fairphone is the sort of phone for people who think LineageOS with an unlocked bootloader is secure made by a company who has sincerely promised to make things better but hasn’t substantially improved security (especially in how often they push security patches). Grapheneos is not a brand name you can just apply to give a phone more reputation, its an OS that represents the highest standard of security.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Graphene modifies AOSP for much more security.

        E.g.

        • you can disable USB data at a hardware level
        • Receives Kernel updates even faster than Google’s phones
        • uses a different memory allocator, hardened_malloc
        • changes the way zygote launches apps, so ASLR actually works
        • doesn’t allow apps to ptrace themselves
        • disables JIT per-app
        • disable network access per-app

        I dont think e/OS is as security oriented, more privacy oriented

        • atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thanks for sharing. For someone who is not so well versed in these technicalities, what does that mean for the user? That you’re more susceptible to fraud and hacking and malware?

          • ExLisperA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Basically GrapheneOS is for people worried about law enforcement or some state actors trying to access their phone using some commercial tools or 0 day exploits. It’s useful for journalist, lawyers, activists and so on.

            Average users don’t really have to worry about those things. It’s unlikely that someone will try to hack you using such tools, you most probably don’t have any data wort protecting and it’s quicker and easier for you to just unlock your phone than to spend days/weeks/months in jail trying to protect your data.

            What average user should care about is removing Google from their phones and blocking trackers. Other ROMs like iode also come without Google and have better tools than GrapheneOS for blocking trackers. They are as secure as any other Android phone.

              • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                That and privacy, you also have a lot of control over what each app can do with gOS’s permissions settings vs standard ROM and most of that is enabled by default. Can break some apps, especially banking related. I have 122 installed, of that three gave me a little bit of trouble where I had to disable some protections to get them functional. DeGoogled by default, I use microG for some limited Play services to get stuff like Youtube Revanced working.

              • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                You would choose it for security hardening in general. E.g. it is harder for malware to infect, harder for unauthorized parties to gain access to data when the phone is locked, etc.

  • _g_be@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I really value the camera on my phone, since it is essentially my main camera and I enjoy taking pictures. I might rather lean into graphene-ing this pixel than a fair phone, unfortunately. But probably not purchase a future pixel, since they abandoned the physical SIM slot

  • Lembot_0006@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 days ago

    The situation won’t improve until some big company goes full “IBM PC” thing with open AT, ISA, VESA, etc tier standards for phones.

    This phone is better just because you can open the case. Spare parts are still provided by a single company. Not a big step ahead.

    Better than nothing though…

  • LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been running a Fairphone 6 for about 6 months now and it’s by far the buggiest phone I’ve ever used. I’d love to keep using it until the security updates stop but it’s already such a miserable experience already I can’t imagine how bad it’ll be in a few years time.

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I bought a Fairphone 5 when they were somewhat new and immediately flashed an alternative ROM onto it (CalyxOS at the time, though now it’s iodeOS as Calyx appears to have gone on hiatus).

      Nothing terrible bug-wise, but I have already had to return the phone to be repaired for a fault I couldn’t repair by swapping parts out myself… Which considering it’s apparently got a number of years ahead of it before it officially gets dropped is a bit worrying.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      3 days ago

      The choice of only supporting Pixels comes from GrapheneOS’s side, not Fairphone. Fairphone got some great ROMs support, and even have an official partnership with one of them (e/OS).

      • ruplicant@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 days ago

        I love Fairphones, but GrapheneOS developers are very clear on why they son’t support phones other than Pixels. If other phones complied with those requirements, they would support them. I really hoped the OEM they’re working with to support from another brand would be Fairphone, but the most educated guess I’ve seen is Motorola

      • ExLisperA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        GrapheneOS developers are quite dickish about what they are willing to implement and how they treat their users. They work under the assumption that GrapheneOS is for people afraid of being hacked (like actively targeted by state level actors) and refuse to add anything that in their view compromises security. So for example they refuse to add pattern unlock because they think it’s less secure than PIN which is silly because I can just use ‘0000’ PIN which is as insecure as any pattern. It’s the same with supporting other phones. Personally I’m not worried about police trying to hack my phone, I just want deGoogled system with tracker protection. GrapheneOS devs don’t care. It’s all or nothing with them. I would recommend iode over Graphene to anyone not as paranoid as the devs.

        • ruplicant@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          They can be dickish about several things, but they will implement whatever they want, it’s their project LOL! They actually develop a mobile operating system for people afraid of being hacked, and with the utmost security in mind.

          The thing with pattern unlock is that it is inherently less secure than the other options, despite the fact that you can use one of the other options in bad ways (like the ‘0000’ PIN). Expecting them to change this is using the lowest common denominator possible, which is against their philosophy.

          You do have other options if you want to deGoogle, like LineageOS, that supports a much wider range of devices (altough the extent of deGoogling can be limited). It’s good we have one ROM (among others) with paranoid devs - we have more options

          • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The thing with pattern unlock is that it is inherently less secure than the other options

            Does Graphene scramble the keypad between PIN entries? If not, it’s functionally the same as a pattern unlock.

          • ExLisperA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s exactly what I said. GrapheneOS devs target very specific group of users and most privacy focused users will be served better by other ROMs. They can do whatever they want but they clearly don’t care about wider community and I think wider community shouldn’t care about them as much as it does.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Some of those requirements are really hard to get for non-Google devices. EOM don’t get updates as early as Google engineers gets. It takes time to validate everything, especially since their don’t control their own hardware.

          Those requirements are more a way to not appear like dicks by telling that they’ll only supports Pixels.

      • Porco@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I know that. So I stand corrected that I should have written “If it were supported by GrapheneOS…”

        Doesn’t change, that its a show stopper for me, though.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s fair. We all have our needs, and I find mine in Fairphone + e/OS, which is nice. And when I upgrade, I get to give my parents an almost new, still supported phone, which is nice.

  • Stardust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    I recently moved from an iPhone 11 Pro to a Fairphone (Fairphone Gen 6), and it’s been a genuinely great change.

    It’s made me realise how little I actually use most of the features you end up paying extra for in flagship phones. Because of that, I’m really looking forward to keeping this device for five years or more.

    The only thing I occasionally miss is camera quality especially at concerts or when travelling but it’s a small trade-off rather than a deal-breaker. I’d love to see future Fairphone models improve on this.

    Hopefully, Fairphone helps set a trend as more people start looking for products that are ethically sourced, repairable and built to last.

    • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Still running a FP4, only replaced the battery and the charging port. No further issues, works like a charm.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I asked someone else, but I hope you don’t mind me asking you as well… With the FP6, 5g works as well? Any issues with MMS or RCS messages? Visual voicemail works fine?

          I am trying to find a new phone, and while there are a few different companies making repairable phones, (Fair phone, HMD, shift) most of them are aimed at EU markets, so I want to make sure that a majority of the features also work in the US. My goal it’s to find something that will work for me, my wife and my in laws that won’t be a hassle. (Because, I do the tech support for all of them, and ideally I’d love to support just 1 device)

          • Stardust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ask away, I have no issue with anything you mentioned inside The Netherlands so I assume the majority of the features would work in the US as well. As they promise a good working phone in the regions they sell. (To keep in mind i do run android not e/os/!)

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Awesome! And just to clarify, 5g works as well? Any issues with MMS or RCS messages? Visual voicemail works?

          I ask because I am actively looking for a replacement for my 4a, it really is at its end of life at this point.

          I was also considering some Nokia/HMD phones,as they made good scores on the ifixit repairability scale. Apparently HMD (who actually make Nokia phones) has a whole line of phones where their goal was modularity/repairability. It’s just been unclear which of these phones actually work on US networks.

          There’s also shift phones out of Germany, but same deal, will they work on US networks?

          I’m guessing the EU has some incentive programs to help these phones exist, but as a result, they’re mostly aimed at EU markets and networks.

          • slamphear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, 5G works (I’m on it at the moment!). No issues with MMS, but I haven’t tested RCS since I’m on /e/OS (which doesn’t support RCS as far as I’m aware - I just use SMS/MMS and Matrix). The visual voicemail functionality in the stock /e/OS Phone app doesn’t work with Mint Mobile, but the T-Mobile Visual Voicemail app does work.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    It all boils down to drivers, if those are not open source (and they usually are not), then phone upgradability depends on them