SOURCE - https://brightwanderer.tumblr.com/post/681806049845608448

Alt-text:
I think a lot about how we as a culture have turned “forever” into the only acceptable definition of success.

Like… if you open a coffee shop and run it for a while and it makes you happy but then stuff gets too expensive and stressful and you want to do something else so you close it, it’s a “failed” business. If you write a book or two, then decide that you don’t actually want to keep doing that, you’re a “failed” writer. If you marry someone, and that marriage is good for a while, and then stops working and you get divorced, it’s a “failed” marriage.

The only acceptable “win condition” is “you keep doing that thing forever”. A friendship that lasts for a few years but then its time is done and you move on is considered less valuable or not a “real” friendship. A hobby that you do for a while and then are done with is a “phase” - or, alternatively, a “pity” that you don’t do that thing any more. A fandom is “dying” because people have had a lot of fun with it but are now moving on to other things.

| just think that something can be good, and also end, and that thing was still good. And it’s okay to be sad that it ended, too. But the idea that anything that ends is automatically less than this hypothetical eternal state of success… I don’t think that’s doing us any good at all.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    18 days ago

    Agree with most of these I guess, but marriage specifically is the one thing that’s intended to be forever. Til death do us part and all that jazz.

    • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      18 days ago

      There’s nothing wrong with forever, but it shouldn’t be some sort of “standard” we hold everything to.

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      18 days ago

      The “death do us part” thing is a tradition, but marriage is a legal status. Not everyone is going to follow that tradition, and surely you wouldn’t argue this ought to bar them from the legal status

    • TheBluePillock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 days ago

      I think it definitely applies to relationships. It does you and any of your partners a disservice to say your relationship was only a success if one of you died.

      A person isn’t a thing you possess. They have needs that grow and change with them. If those needs ever stop being compatible with the relationship, then the relationship should end. That’s not failure. It’s wanting the person you love to be happy.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        Then I guess you, like me, dislike the concept of marriage. Because the whole point is forever. The forever part is not even what I hold against it though. Some people can and want to be together forever. Feeling forced to be by culture is a bad thing though.

        • TheBluePillock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          I see it mostly as a legal contract and legal status, but with a lot of extra baggage heaped on top. It’s an overloaded concept that tries to cover too many things at once, making them all suffer. Separate out the legal business and you’d lose the need for an explicit declaration that this union is to exist in perpetuity until cancelled by either party. Sure sounds full of romance when stated that way, doesn’t it?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            And regardless of how you look at it, the idea is that it’s for life, from the ground up. I could go into how it’s rooted in other horrible things but yeah, the romance is retrofitted to get people to accept it. And it’s worked.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Then I guess you, like me, dislike the concept of marriage. Because the whole point is forever.

          As you get older, you may realize “forever” isn’t actually forever. Its just for the few decades you have left on this planet in this existence. If you find someone that you like being around, they like being around you, and you’re both willing to put up with each other’s faults and shortcomings, then marriage can be a really good path forward.

          When we age, our looks go, our health, and many times our minds too. Having someone that cares about you and has your back through all of that, is a wonderful thing as you will have their back too. You still see them as beautiful as you did when they were younger, and they see you the same way. You look past each other’s graying (or missing) hair, to lack of physique, the lines in your faces, the extra weight you carry in strange places, and eventually the loss of mobility you’ll have and they still want to be around you. You still want to be around them.

          Old age frequently brings loneliness too. When you’re not forced to work a job with people anymore, it takes effort to maintain social relationships with other people. When you have your mate, you always have that company irrespective of other social connections (or lack of).

          Finally if your partner dies before you, I think it will give you something to look forward to in your own eventual death. You know you’ll be at the same place as your mate, wherever or whatever that is. If there is something after, they’ll be there waiting for you. If there is nothing, you get to be nothing together. Life is really tough if you’re going it alone. A mate can shave off those sharp corners and make even the most unpleasant times bearable.

          If you find someone like this, I encourage you to grab on and hold them tight. If you don’t, life will move them along and you’ll be left with just yourself against a cold and uncaring world.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            That’s all well and good, but you absolutely don’t need marriage to stay together forever.

            The point was that the concept shames you into it. Another option is just to stay together because you want to. Seems more meaningful to me that way anyhow.

            • TheBluePillock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              That’s what I strive for in any relationship: staying together purely because we choose to. I don’t want someone to stay with me for any other reason, and I want my partner to know that I choose them. Not out of obligation or necessity, but because I truly want them close to me. It’s simple but meaningful.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 days ago

      My wife just moved out after 30 years of marriage, and it sure feels like a failure to me. Maybe some people get to the point where it’s not working, and they aren’t invested in the marriage so much that walking away is painful. I think most people would say they shouldn’t have been married if they weren’t that invested in making it work though.

      A lot of people have suggested that we should have marriage contracts that have a renewable time limit. Like, “Hey, let’s get married for ten years and see how that goes.” I could see that being a good thing, but I also think it’s fundamentally a different mindset than the traditional expectation of forever.

      • adr1an@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 days ago

        Thanks for sharing your story. Similarly, I’ve been with my partner for 10 years. We planned on having kids, never materialized because of reasons. Now… We are distancing. It certainly feel like failure. I just moved to a new apartment last week.

        So far, I haven’t ‘duel’ the loss, except for some occasional irruption of either sadness (~95%) or rage (~5%). We keep talking daily, trying to part ways softly, we are both migrants in a new country, medium sized city, which adds some peculiarities.

        I think we try to avoid the sentiment of failure by keeping an open mind, and a friendship. I even fantasize this is only temporary. But honestly, we have been on this for a while. Like after the pandemic.

        Anyway, some comments in this thread really help me. I do want her to be happy. We both deserve the best, and frankly we may not be the best fit today. But we were powerful. We went through a lot, and we did good.

        PS. Feel free to write privately of you wanted to share more.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Sorry you’re going through that. I’m going to make the assumption that, with it being a ten year relationship, you’re not super young, but much younger than me (I’m 62). I hope you and your partner are both able to move on in a way you can be at peace with it, and once you’ve grieved the relationship are able to find someone who works better.

          Goes both ways, I’m happy to chat if you’d like.

      • Broadfern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        The game Outer Worlds touches upon this concept a bit, although it’s set in a space-capitalist dystopia.

        Like a more administrative declaration of vow renewal, in a sense. Can feel a bit cold and could cause a lot of bureaucratic headache however.

        I’m sorry for your loss/pain though, on a more serious note.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      I tend to agree with you there. There are a lot of things intended to be temporary, and a lot of things intended to be permanent.