• scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not only does it need to become possible, it needs to become more effective than other treatments like crowns and implants. I think it’s going to be a long time, and even then will only be applicable in limited cases for a long time, and will be really expensive.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, we can make fusion happen, but it’s not exactly useful outside of turning things into not things anymore.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not just cold fusion. We are still working on creating hot fusion reactions that are controlled. That honestly makes sense. It’s kinda weird that we were able to theorize the uncontrolled reaction of fission, and then used that to create a mostly kinda stable controlled fission reactor.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    […] will administer the treatment to patients between the ages of 2 to 7 who are missing at least four teeth

    Yeah, even if this is approved in some form… growing new teeth for young children is not the same as for adults. Very weird this is the population they’re testing on. I’d think they would be testing on people with 10+ missing teeth in their 40s, 50s, 60s+

    […]these treatments are currently focused on patients with congenital tooth deficiency

    Again, not for us.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      You skipped right past the paragraph before that one describing the adult study that needs to succeed prior to the start of the child study.

      Now, scientists will see just how similar, because humans are undergoing a similar trial. Lasting 11 months, this study focuses on 30 males between the ages of 30 and 64—each missing at least one tooth. The drug will be administered intravenously to prove its effectiveness and safety, and luckily, no side effects have been reported in previous animal studies.

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    Popular mechanics is a terrible source. They post click bait trash like this on a consistent basis.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    No they won’t.

    This is the same as “humans may live on a mara colony in 10 years!”

    No they won’t, not even close.

    This article is bullshit and so is the entire site, it’s all djinn economy, all wishes and fantasy with a clickbait header to make sure you go there to watch the ads to make them money.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    If this were to become commercially viable, dentists would move heaven and earth to stop it. Imagine killing 80% of a field with a simple commonplace product.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      People who don’t have any teeth don’t need a dentist, regrown teeth will still get painful cavities or other damage and need fillings or crowns, regrown teeth will probably come in exactly as crooked as your originals and require braces, there’s plenty of room for dentists in a world without permanent tooth loss

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you kidding? Most dentists would love that treatment. You get to improve your patients’ dental health, you give them a smile they can be proud of, and you would be the ones administering the treatment.

      This will more likely be an upcharge service for cavity fillings and to replace implants and shit.

    • fluxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Based on how AI might actually replace a bunch of professions, and nobody fighting tooth and nail about it - I don’t think so.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not a dentist, but isnt the root cause of a lot of our dental problems, the loss of gums and the inability of our stupid gums to heal and grow back?

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve had gum grafts, and they’ve had no difficulty healing and growing back. I’ve also had extra teeth removed and the gums have had no difficulty filling in the gaps. So if all else fails, pull the old tooth, plant the new seed tooth, let the gum heal and then rupture as the new tooth grows out. Should have a nice healthy gum edge again. Although teething as an adult sounds… uncomfortable.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gum disease could lead to tooth loss but the primary way people lose them is through infections due to cavities. The infection weakens the tooth and the jawbone it’s rooted in as well as can lead to loss of the root nerve. At a certain point the tooth is too loose or weak and has to be removed to prevent further infection and/or to treat the existing infection.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been loosely following this company’s progress for a bit. It doesn’t say so in this article, but I think I recall reading that the drug also promotes gum regrowth at the same time.