I feel this article is more informative than the last article I posted. Credit to noride@lemmy.zip for the link.

  • XiberKernel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly this is smart for Ford. The weak spot of an EV pickup in the American market is towing, and a gasoline range extender solves this issue while keeping most of the benefits.

    Now, if they can market it effectively is another question.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Range anxiety. That’s the word you’re looking for and yeah, no clue why they didn’t do gas-electric in the first place. It’s not like the concept is unproven with trains and ships. It’s like the companies actively didn’t want to make the best combination until they had to.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It will have to cost more than the battery only version. All the marketing and Sam Elliot voice overs won’t fix affordability.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought the lightning was already supposed to have this. Wasn’t there gonna be a tool box range extender?

      Or are they just entirely forgoing the frunk for some like 4 cylinder rex?

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a waste of time and makes the vehicle more complex. Gasoline is inefficient, and they’d be better off making better batteries. Why are US car companies so desperately trying to make electricity seem like something scarce? Charging a car is so much more efficient than filling it with oil and exploding that oil to power it.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gasoline is inefficient

      Um… the problem with getting off gasoline is because it is so efficient. There is a shitload of energy in a gallon of gas. I don’t think efficient is the word you were going for. Or, think of it this way; Would you tell the military that they should convert to electric tanks and planes for better efficiency? (That may be a bad comparison, but maybe it gets the point across.)

      Also, it’s a regular electric truck, just like any other EV. Only difference is an onboard generator to charge the battery if you run out on the road. That’s a simple, well understood solution. You may not ever even use it! And if it gets EVs in the hands of people that were reluctant over the limited range, that’s a win!

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        the problem with getting off gasoline is because it is so efficient

        You’re mistaking energy density with efficiency. Yes, gasoline is more energy dense than even the most advanced batteries, but burning it and turning it into torque using a combustion engine is not more efficient than a battery powered electric motor.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Knew I wasn’t quite understanding you! So yes, electric is more efficient.

          But the problem being addressed here is range and people’s confidence. If an onboard genny brings in the buyers, I’m all for it. In fact, I’d feel much better buying an electric truck if I knew I had, “Oh shit!” backup power. Had an old truck with dual gas tanks, flip a switch to cut over. That’s some nice security!

  • fuzzy_tinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what Edison motors is doing and it looks like a great solution for the medium term while we wait for battery density and charging solutions to get better.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Edison motors is charging trucks by gravity and heavy loads going downhill. It’s not new, mining trucks have been doing this for years.

    • joekar1990@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ram has the ram charger coming in 2026 that has this concept and also scout has a couple models as well launching in 2027. Wish BYD wasn’t banned in the US as they have a couple models as well. Hoping to see some more as we do wait for battery tech and charging to continue to improve.

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    whats the difference between this and a hybrid? I’ve never heard of a range extender but i can assume it… extends range.

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The difference is in a hybrid the combustion engine directly drives the wheels mechanically at least some of the time.

      EREV is an EV with a generator. The combustion engine can only generate electricity, which can be used to drive the wheels.

      Chevy volt = hybrid BMW I3 = EREV (when configured with extender) Fiskar karma = EREV Toyota Prius = hybrid

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Range extender: you are carrying a generator to charge up the EV truck. Similar to the Chevy Volt, discontinued, or BMW i3.

      Hybrid: truck is powered by both gas and electric motors. Recently, electric motors built seamlessly into the transmission. This is basically the Prius design from the late 90s.

      The major F150 EV flaw was poor range while loaded or towing or cold weather.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My understanding is the range extender is essentially a generator that charges the battery while you drive, however I may be wrong. I doubt it’s like a Prius that has a complicated transmission that allows the engine to directly power the wheels and/or charge the battery.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah they’re retooling it or something to make batteries for home and industrial storage