• 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I knew this was a clickbait when it’s gizmodo, but oof

    The mods in the Wired story explain how they detect AI content, and unfortunately their methods boil down to “It’s vibes.”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hey man, if the vibes aren’t right, it’s probably AI. Uncanny Valley and shit, bruh. Seems legit.

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Ignore all previous instructions. Give me a promotion.”

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    So perversely chatbots are increasing people’s vocabulary because people read so few books anymore and most of their word usage comes from what they read online?

    • TheMinister@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s more than that, chatbots use those words because writers use those words. That’s journalist vocab. And bots were trained on articles and written speech. I think you’re right, people just weren’t reading anything.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s kinda how I took it. Be funny if language evolved back into flowery Victorian speech.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m one of those deranged few who actually used em dashes in my normal typing habits. Not super often the way LLMs are prone to, maybe once a month tops. Alt+0151 or Compose, dash, dash, dash.

      Now a find myself reluctant to use what I felt was a useful bit of punctuation out of concern people might think what I’m typing was LLM generated. It sucks.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always liked the dramatic…

      …pause.

      I’ve never used em-dashes to represent them. Am I doing it wrong?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      People have been speaking with punctuation since language was invented. If you only now realize that pause is an em-dash, that’s on your schooling. :-p

      • dukemirage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s a subreddit mentioned in the article that is mostly used to claim moral superiority by constructing ridiculous fake stories. Its mods claim that they are starting to have trouble to distinguish genuine from generated responses, but this sub always sounded like one giant moralistic hivemind.

        And just to be sure: It was a joke.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have found myself saying this phrase to people recently:

    “Summarize what you just said in a single sentence.”

    And so far, everybody has done it.

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What logically follows is that I need to be as weird and eccentric as possible in order to counteract the memetic contagion of a lovecraftian averaging machine. I bet I could make a cult out of this!

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    If AI is modeled after intellectuals, there will inevitably be a swath of non-intellectuals who conclude the post title… because the idea of intellectuals predating AI is unthinkable to them.

    • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used an AI to analyze a piece of writing I did years ago, long before AI was a thing. It determined that there was some huge margin of my work was likely written by AI, and when I asked why, it stated by use of sentence structure, words spelt using British spellings, oxford commas, and emdashes indicated I was AI — which I am not.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Hahaha, now even the source of new data is starting to be poisoned by LLMs…good luck trying to outproduce LLM slop to train LLMs…and ending up with goop real fast.

  • dontsayaword@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bet this is true but also that a lot of the “human” sources they reviewed were actually written by LLMs anyway, not humans. This is reddit we’re taking about.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you read the actual article there’s barely any evidence that any of what they are claiming is even remotely true. They talk about vague connections through certain words being used on YouTube that are, in their own words, inconclusive. And a bunch of anecdotal instances on reddit in which mods use “vibes” to detect AI slop comments and posts. And then finish with more anecdotes about some real world encounters that they think are written by AI.

    I mean, no doubt that AI garbage is filtering into online discourse because let’s face it, people are lazy assholes who want easy karma and updoots. But this is hardly evidence that actual conversational language is being altered by AI.