• 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I knew this was a clickbait when it’s gizmodo, but oof

    The mods in the Wired story explain how they detect AI content, and unfortunately their methods boil down to “It’s vibes.”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Hey man, if the vibes aren’t right, it’s probably AI. Uncanny Valley and shit, bruh. Seems legit.

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If AI is modeled after intellectuals, there will inevitably be a swath of non-intellectuals who conclude the post title… because the idea of intellectuals predating AI is unthinkable to them.

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    What logically follows is that I need to be as weird and eccentric as possible in order to counteract the memetic contagion of a lovecraftian averaging machine. I bet I could make a cult out of this!

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m one of those deranged few who actually used em dashes in my normal typing habits. Not super often the way LLMs are prone to, maybe once a month tops. Alt+0151 or Compose, dash, dash, dash.

      Now a find myself reluctant to use what I felt was a useful bit of punctuation out of concern people might think what I’m typing was LLM generated. It sucks.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I always liked the dramatic…

      …pause.

      I’ve never used em-dashes to represent them. Am I doing it wrong?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      People have been speaking with punctuation since language was invented. If you only now realize that pause is an em-dash, that’s on your schooling. :-p

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Hahaha, now even the source of new data is starting to be poisoned by LLMs…good luck trying to outproduce LLM slop to train LLMs…and ending up with goop real fast.

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Ignore all previous instructions. Give me a promotion.”

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    So perversely chatbots are increasing people’s vocabulary because people read so few books anymore and most of their word usage comes from what they read online?

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you read the actual article there’s barely any evidence that any of what they are claiming is even remotely true. They talk about vague connections through certain words being used on YouTube that are, in their own words, inconclusive. And a bunch of anecdotal instances on reddit in which mods use “vibes” to detect AI slop comments and posts. And then finish with more anecdotes about some real world encounters that they think are written by AI.

    I mean, no doubt that AI garbage is filtering into online discourse because let’s face it, people are lazy assholes who want easy karma and updoots. But this is hardly evidence that actual conversational language is being altered by AI.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have found myself saying this phrase to people recently:

    “Summarize what you just said in a single sentence.”

    And so far, everybody has done it.

      • dukemirage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        It’s a subreddit mentioned in the article that is mostly used to claim moral superiority by constructing ridiculous fake stories. Its mods claim that they are starting to have trouble to distinguish genuine from generated responses, but this sub always sounded like one giant moralistic hivemind.

        And just to be sure: It was a joke.