An engineer got curious about how his iLife A11 smart vacuum worked and monitored the network traffic coming from the device. That’s when he noticed it was constantly sending logs and telemetry data to the manufacturer — something he hadn’t consented to. The user, Harishankar, decided to block the telemetry servers’ IP addresses on his network, while keeping the firmware and OTA servers open. While his smart gadget worked for a while, it just refused to turn on soon after. After a lengthy investigation, he discovered that a remote kill command had been issued to his device.

  • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The fact that this isn’t considered outright fraud is disturbing. This person OWNS the device, yes? They’re not leasing it.

    FFS, this should be illegal.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I agree with you that this should be illegal. I expect this was in the terms of service, though. Since we have no laws restricting this kind of bullshit, the company can argue that they’re within their rights.

      We need some real legislation around privacy. It’s never going to happen, but it needs to. We need a right to anonymity but that is too scary for advertisers and our police state.

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I have just purchased a Dreame L10s Ultra and have had the PCB for a breakout board made and components for setting it up ordered. In a few days I should get the last bits and I will be able to root the device and have it connect to Valetudo managed through Home Assistant. Fully local operation with basically the same features but none of the privacy issues. As soon as I can get it connected I will be able to use it just like a robot I actually own should without some random third party being involved in every single operation.

  • ExLisperA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was thinking about getting one but I learned that they do require a lot of maintenance like cleaning the brushes and you have to change parts regularly. That sounds like more work they just sweeping from time to time. Also, broom has a lower carbon footprint.

    • gergo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      I bought one and was disappointed to realise that i still need to (manually!) tidy up the rooms (kids’ toys, cats’ toys etc) for it to have good effect. yes, i am not very smart.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ours has needed very little maintenance and has quickly become a necessity because it gets the floors much cleaner that we ever did. An unexpected consequence is that the whole house stays cleaner because we still spend some of the time and energy we were spending on sweeping on other cleaning tasks.

      As much as the thing irritates me you’d have to pry it from my cold, dead hands.

      • ExLisperA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I guess it depends on your use case. I know people with pets love them because sweeping hair is a lot of work. Probably the same with kids. For us with no pets or kids there’s really not that much sweeping.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    My robot vac will only operate when connected to the Internet so it’s only allowed to communicate when actually in use. As soon as it returns to the charger Internet access is automatically blocked.

    Unfortunately the manufacturer has deliberately made this as inconvenient as possible. If communication is blocked for more than a few hours the vacuum loses all maps and will no longer even load saved maps from the Tuya app. To use it the vac must be powered down and the app killed. Only then can a saved map be restored.

    It’s too bad it’s so useful.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it’s only allowed to communicate when actually in use.

      What’s the point? The manufacturer is interested in the map of your apartment and usage statistics. What do you think it’s sending when not in use? Does it have a microphone or something?

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Since I haven’t pulled it apart or tried to decrypt the ssl traffic I have no idea whether it has “a microphone or something.” That’s the point.

        • everett@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Keeping it offline some of the time isn’t effective against passive data collection unless you’re willing to take the inconvenient step of factory-resetting it each time you’re about to use it. Anything it collects it can just hold onto until it next gets the chance to upload.

  • doomsel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I specifically got one which can run valetudo and it works great for over two years now. Without sending images of my flat to china or the us

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    …when i ‘buy’ something, should i not own and be able to use it and all functions until the end of it’s mechanical processes?..