He gets out of Windows! 😀👍

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “No, you don’t understand, Linux is not desktop ready, I know that because I installed Fedora back in 2008 and it was kinda wonky.”

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      On a serious note, having used Linux on and off since the 90s (aah, Slackware, how I miss installing you from floppies … not), Linux has, IMHO, actually been desktop ready for ages (though definitelly not in the days of Slackware when configuring X was seriously interesting for a geek and pretty much an impossible barrier for everybody else).

      The problem have always been applications not having Linux builds, only Windows builds, not the actual desktop Linux distros being an inferior desktop experience than Windows (well, not once Gnome and KDE emerged and made things like configuring your machine possible via GUIs - the age of the RTFF and editing text files in the command line before that wasn’t exactly friendly for non-techies).

      In other words, from maybe the late 00s onwards the problem were mainly the “networks effects” (in a business sense of "apps are made for Windows because that’s were users are, users go for Windows because that’s were the apps are) rather than the “desktop” experience.

      The almost unassailable advantage of Windows thanks to pretty much just network effects, was something most of us Linux fans were aware since way back.

      What happened in the meanwhile to make Linux more appealing “in the Desktop” was mainly on the app availabilty side - OpenOffice (later LibreOffice and derivatives) providing an Office-style suit in Linux, the movement from locally hosted apps to web-hosted apps meaning that a lot of PC usage was really just browser usage, Wine improving by leaps and bounds and making more and more Windows applications run in Linux (most notably and also thanks to DXVK, Games) and so on.

      Personally I think Linux has been a superior experience on the server side since the late 90s and, aside for the lack of Linux versions of most commonly used non-OS applications, a superior experience in the desktop since the 00s.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oddly enough it seems like Microsoft themselves that’s working towards breaking the network effect. They are pushing people to use the web versions of their software now and since edge is chromium, their web versions should work in Linux.

        In the past Microsoft made most of their money from Windows and Office, but now they make more money off of cloud services so the traditional Windows and Office products are becoming more and more about just driving people to their cloud services. But as they they put more emphasis on cloud services they’re actually making it easier for people to dump Windows, and as they make Windows more about marketing their cloud services, they give people more incentive to dump Windows.

        Microsoft is digging the grave for windows.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      To make a long post short, windows is shitty but its setup bullshit is very straight forward and clear to deal with, linux is great when it works but its setup bullshit is byzantine as all hell. I got Linux working with only light bullshit on a laptop but just gave up entierly after 3 days of trying to get different distros at different advice working on my desktop.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        True. Linux supports a lot of hardware. However some distros support some better than others.

        Basically before you buy hardware you need to check if it works on Linux. Usually it does, but better check throughly

          • Johanno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Uff, that one is difficult.

            In theory all Linux distributions support the same hardware. Its just that sometimes you need to manually install drivers and configure sth. And on Other distros you don’t need to do that for certain hardware.

            I guess Linux Mint is usually pretty good at default support, but of course not everything will work.

            Now about if certain hardware has Linux support:

            Check if the manufacturer is claiming Linux support. This is the best case, you can assume it just works.

            If there is no mention about it from the manufacturer it is still possible to have support. Use an online search machine and enter “specific hardware Linux support” or use linux mint instead of linux so that you can be sure it works for your distro.

            What usually works almost always:

            Motherboards(except if they are a few months old from release)

            Keyboards (unless they are gaming keyboards with special tools like razer, then only the normal keyboard functions are working without special config)

            Monitors

            Grafic cards (they don’t work from day one release, you should always wait a few months)

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I suspect Mint would work fine on that same desktop at this point, since it was just very new at the time and support take a bit to come in, but now its all set up how I want. Perhaps when windows next shits itself and I need to re-format anyway.

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can confirm. In over 10 years of Arch I had only three breakages, two of which were self-caused by not checking for required manual intervention before upgrading. The third was because my laptop’s battery died during an upgrade.
        And the fix was always the same. Boot a life image, chroot into my install and fix it.

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Finally swapped to Linux last week and loving it! Kubuntu because I wanted KDE for KZones since I was using FancyZones from PowerToys on Windows. The hardest part was migrating my qBitTorrent, Sonarr/Radarr/Plex because they all point to windows drives. A simple replace in the DB file fixed it, and we’re running smoothly!

    Gonna get an auto encode/upload working this weekend, and I’m so excited. I don’t feel held back like windows, and it doesn’t feel like work configuring it, which I was afraid of.

    A few hiccups here and there, but I think of it like growing pains that will eventually go away.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I can’t switch, there’s this one function of this one programme that I may need in the next 50 years.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      As long as you’re whining to the game publishers, not Linux people who are not only technically unable but also legally prohibited from doing anything about it.

      It’s important to place the blame where it belongs.

    • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are solutions. Those developers/publishers would rather have kernel level anticheats than use any of them.

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Server level anti cheat is never going to work on its own unless they switch to cloud gaming entirely. And nobody except shareholders are waiting for that.