ZFS: 🙂
I zoomed in to read what they’re saying on the bottom right and was disappointed.
IDK what they mean by better ssd I/O performance, btrfs was the worst FS I tested for some heavy SSD workloads (like writing thousands of little pngs in short time, file searches, merging huge weights with some paging)…
The features are fantastic, especially for HDDs, but it’s an inherently high overhead FS.
ext4 was also bad. F2FS and XFS are great, and I’ve stuck with F2FS for now.
idk man I just wanted to make a funny meme I’ve never run benchmarks myself and I just use btrfs for the features
Oh cool! Share the funny meme when it’s done.
(just pulling your leg. ^^)
Yeah I meant no harm :P
Yeah none taken ;)
Still no built-in encryption support :(
That surgeon general’s warning sent me into a giggle fit.
I can’t be the only one that reads BTFRS as butt farts
Hot format. Invest invest INVEST
Wtf lol
What BTRFS stand for? (Wrong answers only)
Bro The RAID Fuckin Sucks
Buttered Toast and Recursive Folder Shenanigans
Better FS
Unfortunately, no. FOSS devs are notoriously known for picking bad names for their projects and BTRFS is no exception. The official name is Butter FS, likely because it’s supposed to make your experience smooth, yet anyone who tried to use its RAID5/6 implementations can tell you that it’s furthest from the truth.
BlueTooth Rams Family Sister
How about lvmvdo
Oh thanks for this.
what’s the advantage of raid 5&6 over something like raid 4&5 - it reads essentially the same to me - a parity redundancy.
4 is bad because parity is on one drive so no matter what happens that drive is the write bottleneck. Raid5 is basically raid4 + raid0.
5 is just fine but low safety, I run 6 always and it has basically never let me down.
