• zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    “We’re at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift.”

    What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

    Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

  • jimerson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Am I missing something, or did they just dress up a woman with a prosthetic leg to resemble an android, and remove the dressing around the prosthetic to “prove” she isn’t human?

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    This seems to be the really interesting part: “…the bot also contains the “first all-solid-state battery in the industry,” as opposed to the liquid electrolyte typically found in lithium-ion batteries. Solid-state batteries are considered the “holy grail” for electric vehicle development …”

  • Bjarne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I guess they will eventually get there. It is interesting to point out though that the first robot is only shown from the torso down. Guess it has some support?

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If the robot is tough enough for production they should have no fear of stripping the clothes off with a box knife. The whole scene was still pretty impressive, especially compared to last week’s Russia bot! 🤦🏻‍♂️

    But still, were I heading this project, I’d insist on toughness at this point in development. (Talking out my ass, looking to the end game, no idea where they’re at ATM.)

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a “straight-up Terminator”?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        So far. Since Terminators are capable humanoid robots and the goal is to make capable humanoid robots each improvement is going to look more like a Terminator. And also like every other capable humanoid robot from other sci-fi as well, good bad or neutral.

        The only reason to leap to “OMG it’s a Terminator!” Is to bait the clicks.

        • BennyInc@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well to be fair, they didn’t have to give it machine gun arms and red glowing eyes. But maybe that’s just me.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          It looks the a Terminator “under the hood”. I doubt anyone was trying to sell a “living tissue over metal endoskeleton” kinda headline.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into “hey this robot has tits”, and when they don’t, the comments turn into “humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines”.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’d say “found the bot”, but even bots are familiar with why boobs appeal to human sensibilities.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    “We’re at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift.”

    What?

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I get you! She’s extraordinarily beautiful, and not just in a blonde hair/blue eyes kinda way. I have an admiration for any man or woman who works hard to maximize their appearance. My wife is like that. She won’t win any beauty pageants, but she is as attractive as it’s possible to be for her. It’s fucking hard work and Swift could do nothing to be any more attractive.

      Turns out I like her music too! Kids listening to something, “That’s cool, who’s that?”

      But sexy? Maybe she’s too perfect? I like a woman that’s “off” in some way. Maybe a big nose, wide-spaced eyes, pouchy mouth, gimme some imperfections that stand out.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

    The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

  • toffi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “We’ve now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel ‘Don’t build the doomsday machine’”