• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      156
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s because people looked at a line of a diff without looking at the actual context.
      It’s like finding the line in a diff where someone deleted a call to “check password” and concluding that this means the service is no longer verifying passwords.

      https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/

      https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/faq/

      We never sell your personal data. Unlike other big tech companies that collect and profit off your personal information, we’re built with privacy as the default. We don’t know your age, gender, precise location, or other information Big Tech collects and profits from.

      Basically, they consolidated and clarified their data privacy policies to be legally accurate. People took a content change to be a policy change on the assumption that you can’t just delete words in one place and put new ones somewhere else.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Theo to me had the same energy as Pirate Software. One of these days there’s gonna be some cancelling, someone mark these words.

    • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s been a while since I watched his content, but isn’t most of his stuff just clips of him reading back someone else’s article at you with inane commentary added in between?

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup. Kind of like ThePrimeagen. And he always knows some other influencial/famous dev who does something cool. And he always showcases his sponsors’ products in a way that makes it seem like he just recently used it to great success in his latest project/own launched product. Like how tf do you have time to launch so many (unnamed/unmentioned) products??

  • nocteb@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    throw std::future_error(std::make_error_code(std::future_errc::broken_promise));

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I also use Librewolf but I can’t really recommend it to normal users because its fingerprint resistance is extremely aggressive and often degrades the experience.

      • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only thing I’ve had to tweak it for was being able to scan QR codes for payments. Haven’t come across any other issues at all.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Random tangent, but I tried PaleMoon to see if it used less RAM these days.

    …And it seems they’ve forked pretty hard. All the rendering acceleration is years behind FF, and frankly it lagged on the test page (a web app text editor) I was interested in.

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Important context!

    They had to change this because newer laws like the CCPA classify some ways of transferring/processing data as a “sale”, even if no money is exchanged.

    See: this Firefox FAQ where they say:

    The reason we’ve stepped away from making blanket claims that “We never sell your data” is because, in some places, the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is broad and evolving. As an example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

    Similar privacy laws exist in other US states, including in Virginia and Colorado. And that’s a good thing — Mozilla has long been a supporter of data privacy laws that empower people — but the competing interpretations of do-not-sell requirements does leave many businesses uncertain about their exact obligations and whether or not they’re considered to be “selling data.”

    In order to make Firefox commercially viable, there are a number of places where we collect and share some data with our partners, including our optional ads on New Tab and providing sponsored suggestions in the search bar. We set all of this out in our privacy notice. Whenever we share data with our partners, we put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share is stripped of potentially identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

    We’re continuing to make sure that Firefox provides you with sensible default settings that you can review during onboarding or adjust at any time.

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      As an example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

      Yes. That is selling. If you exchange customer data for money or other valuables, that is the definition of “selling”.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn. Shame I need a browser on Windows, Linux, iOS and android. Which is why I’ve been using Firefox for so long.