• its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is also happening for water. They could use closed cooling systems, but water is so cheap for them it’s considered a waste of money to not use evaporative cooling .

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    These data centers are a failure on the part of local and state governments. Of course you expect companies to take advantage, that’s what representative government is supposed to protect us from.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      that’s what representative government is supposed to protect us from.

      Where did you get this idea?

      Representative government’s only function is to kneecap democracy by removing power from the people and putting it in the handful of a few manageable ‘representatives’. It’s got nothing to do with protection from businesses.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you have a balcony that gets sunlight, you could put a couple panels there. Certainly won’t provide all your electricity but it could make a dent.

      Or you could look into community solar projects

  • wulrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ideas?

    • CO2 tax - if it’d be high enough to completely pay for the damage, this shit would stop pretty fast. But even less than that would help. Alternative: Certificates without loopholes. Some use would survive, e. g. an IT professional would still use $ 50 worth of energy per day if it gives a 10 % productivity boost, but models would start consolidating and use all tricks to keep it efficient, rather than push out whatever they can. Only works when imports from regions that refuse to participate are taxed when imported, or outright banned.
    • Huge advantage of machine learning: The “when” is completely flexible. Could just use excess power from renewable peaks, or even nuclear & coal nightly production. But as long as it’s cheap enough to just make more power around the clock: Why should they? They won’t do it voluntarily. Solutions could start with a “green” label for consumers, but that would probably not do that much. It also won’t help when we force them to use 100 % renewables and nuclear, and then they just buy all solar panels and wind turbines off the market leaving us with higher costs and trouble switching to net 0
    • Evaluate the market and identify the bubble. Does an AI focussed company make conservative use of existing capabilities, without overhyping them, or put their money on likely near-future developments, or depend entirely on optimistic future capabilities?
    • With such measures in place, we’d still have the models they trained so far. They’d eventually plateau anyway (or already have). When training of new models stops, as we make it too expensive to spend a lot of power for a tiny improvement, a good part of the power waste stops.