• betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That has 5 moving parts, while a touchscreen has none. It’s much easier and cheaper for the manufacturer to install the touchscreen. But instead of passing the savings to you, they probably keep it or pass it on to investors.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly.

      Each of those knobs needs an injection mould, each switch behind it a supply chain. Iterating on digital design is far cheaper as well.

      It’s far cheaper to use what are effectively 10 year old tablets in the cheaper cars. Since LCDs are being mass manufactured for other things that likely get a nice economy of scale.

    • TheMediocreOne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      But the touch screen comes with a price you pay for the UI development which is not a small amount. So while installing it might be cheaper, in the end I would argue it’s more expensive.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The screen could well be more expensive than the dial parts, but installation would be cheaper, so we’d need the numbers. The thing about software is that it’s very expensive to make but selling price is as low or high as you need it to be.