This does unfortunately happen multiple times per day. Sometimes it’s smaller incidents where the tram driver can get out and collapse the car’s mirror. Other times the owner of the car comes out of a nearby house after the tram used its bell extensively (like today) and moves the car. And then there are times when police needs to get involved to tow the car which often takes upwards of 1 hour.

The truly infuriating part is that if the tram damages a poorly parked car, the transportation company will have to pay the damages. Poorly parked vehicles never get fined and the owners will only need to pay if the car ends up getting towed.

Why do we accept that drivers sabotage a city’s public transport infrastructure like this?

  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    11 days ago

    would it be a controversial opinion that those trams should be strong enough to ram and move those cars, the owner is then responsible to pay for the fines, damages to his own vehicle, and whatever damages the ramming has caused to the tram.

    • jimmux@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      I know in Melbourne at least, trams collide with cars pretty frequently. For some reason people think it’s a good idea to u-turn when they’re approaching. The trams rarely seem to be damaged. It’s not fun for passengers though.

      Maybe the next World Tram Championships should add an event: the Car Toss. That would help people visualise the consequences of leaving vehicles too close to tracks.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      The driver should be able to use the PA to announce “this is your driver, prepare for ramming speed, brace for impact”… But the trams should also be equipped with something that could key cars parked close to the tracks. That way nobody would chance it parking a little close.

      I don’t mean like a machete, that would probably not go over well at the stops. Just something that would scratch any car coming with 5cm of the tram.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        the scratching thing is just punitive, if someone parked in a safe distance then it’s fine, if they aren’t, then fuck em, ruin their car.

        adding a device that would cause damage for the sake of it seems too extra.

        and whenever the driver says “brace for impact” I’m sure all the passengers will clap and love it.

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      In the spirit of controversial opinions, wouldn’t those cars be the best targets for robbery?

      You go in the night, break in, steal some shit, then in the morning the police come and move the car, theft is hard to solve as it is, the added confusion must be helpful for the robber.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        not sure how it relates?

        if park on the tram path you get your car hit by a tram and robbed?

        more incentive not to park there.

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 days ago

          more incentive not to park there.

          Yes, that was my general idea, but also was an intrusive thought, there are better ways to discourage this behavior i think.

    • BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      If I’m not mistaken, that’s the case in Brussels: Trams ALWAYS have priority. Whatever happens, if a car collid with a tram, the car is at fault.

      A friend who used to live there told me its true even if the car is empty and the tram hit it… Repeteadly…

      Edit: see below comment, much more complete answer!