• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean…

    To fix it we need free and available mental healthcare, a population with something they don’t want to lose, or reasonable gun laws.

    None of those things have a chance of happening right now with the current government.

    Even if trump passes gun control of some sort it’s not going to be reasonable. And that’s the only one of the three that are plausible.

    But right now no one wants trump to pass any gun laws. Even if Dems get House/Senate in midterms, trump will veto anything reasonable.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    Letting the Trump administration be in charge of disarming Americans seems like a poor move for everything and everyone except the regime.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The left pursues stricter gun control. Safety nets. Mental health services.

    Conservatives fight to prevent those things.

    You literally have two parties, one of them known for being neutral and looking for solutions, and the other known for deflecting and scapegoating… and you still have people not seeing the difference. And people think coalitional governments are good. We can’t even handle 2.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d argue the US does not have a leftist party. When I was young, we had a centrist party and a right party. I’ve watched in my lifetime the right decide to go further right, and the centrist party go right to chase some purported ‘balance’. (This was all Bush/Obama era, before Trump/MAGA entered the game)

      We do not have a leftist party. We have the right and extreme right parties. And we only have two because of a mathematical flaw in the iterated first past the post electoral system.

      And we might not even have two parties. The DNC and RNC have so many overlapping funding sources and so many behind the scenes organization that they could be seen as two divisions of the same team. Even if no explicit link can be found, despite the theater the two organizations have a healthy symbiotic relationship - each preferring the devil they know over any third party upset.

      With all of the above, many intelligent people have checked out - the marginal benefit of supporting the D’s over the R’s just doesn’t justify propping up a system that is fundamentally broken at it’s core.

      (P. S. I personally don’t agree with that conclusion and will swallow my pride to vote for the best available candidate, but I think painting the people that don’t agree as wholesale fools is a very unhelpful way of framing things.)

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The left pursues stricter gun control.

      I’m not opposed to gun control but take a look at Canada at the moment, one mass shooting from an individual who did not have a license to posses or acquire firearms to begin with and the government goes and targets sport shooters and hunters who do have the appropriate licenses? It’s been 5 years and it’s clear they’re removing all semi-automatic rifles from licensed individuals private possession, calling them “assault rifles”.

      If I had a conversation with the Public Safety Minister it would go a little like this; If these are Assault Rifles that belong in the military, why aren’t we suppling our troops with these rifles then, why did NATO reject sending these firearms to Ukraine, why did Bill C-17 not prevent these firearms from entering the market for the last 30 years?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Actually, this wasn’t such a thing until the Kirk shooting and the entire right wing decided in 20 seconds flat that every Democrat murdered Charlie Kirk. So they’ll be getting a more fact based version of that for the foreseeable future. We’re sick of taking the high road.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh look, another “both sides” useful idiot.

    Fun fact: one “side” has no desire at all to curb gun violence in the USA. They just get upset when their stochastic terrorism backfires.

  • WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.orgBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The culprit is American culture, and most people feed the beast that creates it. Maybe it’s time to detach from Americas values and lifestyle.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    don’t stop your enemy when they’re making mistakes.

    if the far right wants to cannibalize itself, they can go for it.

  • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    There was a cartoon/comic/image I saw back in the trump shooting. About how they realised the shooter was a white guy, and the audience breathes a sigh of relief saying ‘race war postponed’.

    I wonder what will happen if “the wrong type of person” is linked to a mass shooting, and what will happen next.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We got a hint of that with the Mormons. And the right always chooses to believe any shooter is trans so…

      We will probably see a few more assassinations until people start shooting up protests.