All the second amendment freaks are suddenly awfully silent. Wasn’t this the exact scenario the 2A was intended for? To fight against wannabe kings?
Can’t wait for some overpaid and overeducated shithead at the New York Times to get all “Ah ah ah, it’s not a constitutional crisis yet you dirty plebs! They didn’t say they’re defying the court order, they said they’re interpreting it, and we have no choice but to take that completely obvious bullshit at face value because that’s how patriotic journalists talk about the leader of the free world.”
I don’t think “over educated” is the right word. I lean toward “poorly educated regarding history and the other humanities.”
Eh, fair, I definitely don’t want to trash the value of a real genuine education, but I am sick to death of these arrogant idiots who just memorized a bunch of neoliberal ideology and justifications for empire at bullshit ivy league schools and then act like they deserve their giant platforms and paychecks
Not sure I understand what the new York times has to do with this story at this time, why don’t lemmings wait to see what’s written before leveling criticism at them?
Because they’ve been shit tier journalism and the handmaidens of human rights atrocities since at least Iran-Contra. They used to be good back in like the 60s and their insane amount of resources they can throw at stories means occasionally they get an interesting scoop, but their editorial board are a bunch of mendacious pricks who will throw marginalized people under the bus and help the rich and powerful sweep dirt under the rug for access.
So why don’t you quote those problems rather than putting words in their mouths?
At this point, I am calling it. He is dead.
The DOJ has walked itself into a corner. They say they are trying (which is a good faith argument keeping them out of contempt)but also say the courts can’t make them(this implies thay are not in good faith trying and should land them in contempt). If Xinis doesn’t hold the DOJ in contempt after today then you can kiss checks and balances goodbye.
This is a very loose analysis by a guy who handles mostly medical malpractice and only knows what he has read in a couple of articles so don’t take my word for it.
Edit: does to doesn’t
While dead is definitely possible, my thoughts are on brutally injured and they don’t want anyone to know.
I don’t they care if people know that the prison brutally injures people. In fact, that is kind of the point of sending people to that specific prison and people know that. If he is dead, that is a little different.
Yeah, I mean how do we know they didn’t just kill ALL these guys as soon as they got off the plane?
I think they just don’t want him in front of cameras. Because they’ll come off like the Stasi.
So does that make it official that the courts have no power and Trump can do whatever the fuck he wants? Have they called time of death for America yet? Get it overwith.
Is it bcz the prison is actually a death camp and he isn’t alive TO BRING back? It’s as simple as putting him on a damn plane.
They refused to even show then to the reporters.
Did anyone really expect differently?
