The plan would replace the $600 million in subsidies Denmark gives the island each year

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly considering giving about $10,000 to each Greenland resident as part of its plan to annex the island.

The possibility would seek to replace the $600 million Denmark gives the territory in subsidies every year, and has stopped being mere rhetoric to become official U.S. policy, according to The New York Times.

The outlet detailed that the plan already includes several cabinet departments and that the White House’s National Security Council has met several times to advance on it, recently sending specific instructions to different offices.

  • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hey when are we gonna get our $5000 Donny? I really need it to start building my crypto factory in order to become a billionaire by the summer.

  • PurpleSkull@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    And…then?

    1. Greenland still belongs to Denmark even if you give 99999999 gazillion to each Greenlander

    2. I don’t think anyone in Greenland is dumb enough to sell out their country for 10k to then live in a country where you will pay out of your ass in taxes, handing those 10k right back to the IRS in 5 years tops.

    3. Greenlanders would have to call themselves “Americans” henceforth, which is considered an insult and lower class of civilization world-wide.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I read someplace that theres about 17 trillion in minerals and oil in greenland. ~57000 population of greenland, so paying for just the mineral wealth not the land and other resources, he’d owe each inhabitant about 298 million. each. So he’s paying them 1 /30,000th of what he should be offering.

  • SaladKing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Who in their right mind would trust the US right now? Or ever really…the US undid so much precedent over the last few months that it is laughable to even consider trusting them.

  • selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    10k of MY FUCKING TAX MONEY, you stupid ape!

    McDonald’s do your job already. This is getting ridiculous.

  • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why do we need Greenland? Is it so we can easily attack Russia or something? Isn’t Alaska pretty fucking close? Like what is the reason for annexing Greenland?

    • FortyTwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Probably many greedy reasons, but my personal favourite speculation: annexing Greenland surrounds Canada and stops any potential aid by its NATO allies in case of an invasion, since annexing Canada is one of the stated objectives of the US now.

      In terms of strategy for actual national security, they already got all the access they wanted, if they wanted more all they had to do was ask. If they’re the ones doing the attacking of a common ally, though, they wouldn’t get that access. So it’s only of added strategic value to annex instead of maintaining the alliance if the goal is to attack members of the alliance.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mineral rights and control of what will be a major shipping route as the North opens up due to climate change.

      • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fuck that’s insane. Makes perfect sense but holy shit. I fucking hate this planet and this country even more.

        • AugustWest@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No it doesn’t make sense. Unless there is a grift.

          Because in the past a company could negotiate for passage and minerals.

          But this time a countrys leader wants to get in on that wealth and grift.

          So it makes sense only if some asshole abuses their power for greed.

          This all sucks.

          • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I meant fucked as in our politicians are, despite what we think, thinking generations ahead to the point they’ve accepted the consequences of our actions and know there’s no going back and therefore looking for ways to monetize the future bleakness that is our world.

            • AugustWest@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I worded what I said poorly. I agree with you, it makes no sense. Short term thinking. I was trying to say that they could do all sorts of horrible things in the old fashioned way, not draw much attention and not much complaint. They could accomplish their short sighted plans without all the drama and scrutiny.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Trump definitely won’t attack Russia. Vladimir Putin is his bestie.

      I think Putin is uncomfortable with a NATO country in that strategic position, so he has manipulated Trump into thinking that it would be a good “real estate deal” for the US to take it over.

  • DrFistington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lol, literally fucking stealing from tax payer after crashing the economy so that he can pay off a foreign country to join the scam

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, yeah, it would be.

      We would need to drastically increase taxes in order to have UBI for the poorest people in the US. Right now, across the board, all of us are paying some of the lowest income taxes since income taxation was introduced. After you consider things like the EIC, a lot of poor people have a negative tax rate. As it is, we’re running a budget deficit every single year, and most of that deficit is entitlement programs (I’m not using that in a pejorative sense) like social security and Medicare.

      (No, social security is not fully funded; people pay in far less than they end up getting paid back, and the system relies on a constantly expanding pool of people paying into it to fund the people that are currently drawing from it. To fix that, we would need to increase social security taxes, end the cap on those taxes, and probably set the retirement age higher.)

      Even if we took every single penny that every billionaire in the US had, that would fund the federal gov’t for something like eight months. Total. And then it would all be gone. (Plus the stock and bond markets would crater, but eh.)

      Yeah, we need to bring back the highest marginal tax rates for sure. And we need to increase corporate taxes and eliminate a lot of the corporate cash giveaways. But we also need to increase taxes on the middle class. I’m saying this as someone that’s at the lower end of middle class; I’m not paying enough in taxes for what i think this country should be doing for the citizens of the country. But man, if you told me my tax bill was going to go up by $8k, but I’d also get national single payer health care? And national public transit, and free public universities? I would cream my panties.

  • Tall_Chilchuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    The plan would replace the $600 million in subsidies Denmark gives the island each year

    A quick google tells me Greenland has a population of ~57,000. At $10k per resident, that’s $570 million.

    On money alone, his offer is less than what they already receive, and unless he’s pitching for some sort of UBI it’ll be a one-time payment instead of annual. Is this the art of the deal they keep talking about?

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      On top of this, Denmark had been doing this every year. The only thing you can count on Trump doing every year is to change his mind and ask you if you’ve said thank you for it.

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, Denmark subsides are probably in Euros. So it’s already 5% higher just on Trump’s first 3 months.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      10k to get lost, it’s unspoken but the money is to leave the country because that is then owned by Trump.

      This is a typical Trump deal, Trump gets what he wants and the other side gets ripped off. There never will be equal footing between trading partners in a Trump deal.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s going to cost more than that just to hire movers that will transport outside the country. It doesn’t even come close to what it would cost to set up a new life somewhere else.