The plan would replace the $600 million in subsidies Denmark gives the island each year

The Donald Trump administration is reportedly considering giving about $10,000 to each Greenland resident as part of its plan to annex the island.

The possibility would seek to replace the $600 million Denmark gives the territory in subsidies every year, and has stopped being mere rhetoric to become official U.S. policy, according to The New York Times.

The outlet detailed that the plan already includes several cabinet departments and that the White House’s National Security Council has met several times to advance on it, recently sending specific instructions to different offices.

  • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why do we need Greenland? Is it so we can easily attack Russia or something? Isn’t Alaska pretty fucking close? Like what is the reason for annexing Greenland?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mineral rights and control of what will be a major shipping route as the North opens up due to climate change.

      • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fuck that’s insane. Makes perfect sense but holy shit. I fucking hate this planet and this country even more.

        • AugustWest@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No it doesn’t make sense. Unless there is a grift.

          Because in the past a company could negotiate for passage and minerals.

          But this time a countrys leader wants to get in on that wealth and grift.

          So it makes sense only if some asshole abuses their power for greed.

          This all sucks.

          • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I meant fucked as in our politicians are, despite what we think, thinking generations ahead to the point they’ve accepted the consequences of our actions and know there’s no going back and therefore looking for ways to monetize the future bleakness that is our world.

            • AugustWest@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I worded what I said poorly. I agree with you, it makes no sense. Short term thinking. I was trying to say that they could do all sorts of horrible things in the old fashioned way, not draw much attention and not much complaint. They could accomplish their short sighted plans without all the drama and scrutiny.

    • FortyTwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Probably many greedy reasons, but my personal favourite speculation: annexing Greenland surrounds Canada and stops any potential aid by its NATO allies in case of an invasion, since annexing Canada is one of the stated objectives of the US now.

      In terms of strategy for actual national security, they already got all the access they wanted, if they wanted more all they had to do was ask. If they’re the ones doing the attacking of a common ally, though, they wouldn’t get that access. So it’s only of added strategic value to annex instead of maintaining the alliance if the goal is to attack members of the alliance.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Trump definitely won’t attack Russia. Vladimir Putin is his bestie.

      I think Putin is uncomfortable with a NATO country in that strategic position, so he has manipulated Trump into thinking that it would be a good “real estate deal” for the US to take it over.