• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. Incredibly frustrating that the proletariat has allowed itself to be caged in such a way that we must even ask permission to dissent.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They would be looked upon more fondly if oil companies didn’t pay for a massive media campaign against them.

      I’m all for bringing back eco terrorism though, but for now it looks like the best we get is stopping traffic for a few hours and throwing paint on glass covers. Better then nothing in any case.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Buddy, they’re funded by big oil.

        One of their biggest backers is an oil heiress, who has supposedly had a change of heart about fossil fuels.

        And their solution seems to be to fund an organisation that does a whole bunch of performative BS that doesn’t actually do anything to stop our use of fossil fuels.

        They’re controlled opposition, make no mistake.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Stopping people from going about their day is a legitimate tactic. “No justice, no peace” and all that jazz.

      It does generally require a much larger group with more sustained activity, though.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, but compare that to a group like Sea Shepherd, who will break onto a boat, open the sea chests, and sink her at her moorings.

        I know which one I have more respect for.

  • Squiddork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    The whole point of notifying the authorities is so they can plan emergency services around a disruption that would otherwise impede that service and have plans in place for a mass gathering.

    It’s obviously not used for that, I wonder if we’ll see new forms of guerilla protesting before things get violent. Definitely ways to cause huge economic damage without massing or hurting people.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    The British police can impose “conditions” on protests. When people protesting Israel’s starvation in Gaza wanted to bang pots and pans outside the Zionist embassy, the police said you can’t bang pots and pans. So the whole point of the protest was muted.

    It’s just low key authoritarianism.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Damn I haven’t heard the term “po po” since 2019 (Hong Kong Protests). Hearing that term again reminds me of another era. Covid wasn’t even a thing yet.

    Wait wtf, its been SIX FUCKING YEARS?!? And now the world got more autocratic? 🥲

    Edit: Also, I remember in school (in the US) when they said that you need a permit to protest, I was just like wtf?!? at the time, and at that moment, I knew “freedom” was just another lie.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Great Unwashed Masses have ONLY ever been able to protest at the patience of their government.

    If any form of government decides they are too bothered by a protest, they WILL crack down and either jail you, (if you are lucky), or outright kill you to make the protests go away.