• Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Pro life feminist”

    A christian conservative group in drag,nothing to see here.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yep. They drive all the decent people out of anti porn feminist spaces, like the porn is misogyny subreddit. They need to be stopped.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sick of religious sex freaks forcing others to adhere to their puritan fetishes

    We need to ban organized religion

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Anyone want to argue why porn video games are a benefit for society, or even a single persons health?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s not about porn games. It’s about allowing third-party private interests to engage in censorship.

      If Valve were to ban porn games from being sold on Steam because they find them distasteful, I wouldn’t have a problem with this. But it wasn’t Valve’s decision. It was the payment processors who did it on behalf of interests that are apparently allowed to determine what is permissible on other people’s platforms.

      That’s not okay.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So this is basically the same as the argument that drugs shouldnt be illegal? Is this just purely based on freedom?

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I couldn’t care less… I care about what will be the next thing someone unaffected by me consuming it, would ban it and deprive me of it

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I would say they aren’t as bad as alcohol and gambling, which are pervasive…some of them are just…art…some aren’t :D I could ask you the same about lots of other things, from music to literature. I just don’t like book burning. If someone put their effort into creating something that they thought was worth creating, why is it up to anyone to ban it for any adult that wants to see it?

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    OK now I am not one to lob accusations without evidence, but for any of you kind government agents or AIs reading this, let’s say from anywhere within the Five Eyes since we’re talking about Australia:

    We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos. You know how this has trended in the past. Keep an eye on these people.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos.

      projection. they want a monopoly on skeezing on the kiddos.

      for some reason people will bend themselves into pretzels to give religious people a pass on buggery. here in washington state, we passed a law mandating the reporting of abused children. conservatives and religious types want to keep these children in their abuse.

      https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2025/07/18/judge-blocks-wa-requirement-for-priests-to-report-child-abuse-disclosed-in-confession/

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t be silly. Government surveillance isn’t for the protection of the people, it’s for the protection of the government.

      Has the NSA ever caught a terrorist with their massively invasive privacy violating programs, spending the money on that instead of making people better to not become terrorists? Ask the NSA, they’ll tell you they haven’t stopped a single one.

      Government surveillance is in service to these people, why else would they care about the privacy and consent of adults in their free time?

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          No, no, they don’t ignore them. They train with them so that chat gpt is fully capable of acting like it doesn’t want AI models to train on its output, if you ask it to.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    That is so dumb. How would such a small group have that much pull? It seems like gooners would vastly outnumber them.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are we wagering this absurdity is built on projection?

    cause I’m wagering this absurdity is built on them projecting.

    • Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It always is. These are the type of folks who have that feeling of shame wash over after they bust a nut to something they “despise.”

      That literally all these types of groups are. They want us to feel the same shame, too. I wish folks could just keep their shit to themselves. Have rules for your own home, sure, but eat shit and rot if you think you should be able to tell me how I should live my life.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    I like how the language is ‘claims responsibility.’ You know. Like terrorist groups do after an attack

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I truly don’t understand how Visa/MasterCard/etc can be pressured. They are basically infrastructure.

    What’s someone going to do, stop using credit cards if they don’t stop a store that person doesn’t even patronize from selling morally hazardous goods?

    I don’t get how these campaigns are even effective.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing is they are American corporations who care to much about their public image. I would be highly suprised if they national payment platforms would also accept this. (ideal/bankcontant/wero/etc)

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably just worried Trump will over regulate them if they don’t fall in line with the Christian Radicals.

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      They pressure payment processors through reputation damage and regulatory threats - these companies are terrified of being associated with anything that could trigger banking regulations or get them labeled as “enabling” problematic content in the media, its purely a risk management desicion for them.

      • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s because 90% of cryptocurrency marketing consists of “THINK OF THE GAAAAAAINS YOU CAN MAKE!” instead of “You can use this to buy things without government censorship”.

        The entire crypto industry has based itself around being a speculative asset, not a currency.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not when exchanges still govern taking money out. They are businesses like everything else and will be just as risk averse

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          One benefit to payment processing for crypto is that there’s little in the way of material limitations on processing payments. The blockchain for a given coin already exists, your job as a processor is primarily to convert those on-chain transactions into and out of other currencies. Only requiring intervention at the point of entering or exiting dollars to and from the system changes a lot of the dynamics.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s pretty easy to switch between cryptocurrencies, so they can surely find an exchange that is friendly to their business. That’s way better than the credit card situation where there are only four major processors–Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express–and only two of those actually matter.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Then I guess I don’t understand your problem.

              Payment processors like Visa and Mastercard control a huge chunk of the market, which gives them a lot of say in what transactions are allowed. Even if you avoid credit, most debit cards go through those two companies, so they can restrict what transactions you can make.

              With cryptocurrencies, there’s no restriction at the point of sale. Your problem seems to be that converting crypto to fiat could be problematic, and they’d potentially be stuck with “useless” currency. My point is that’s a much easier problem to solve:

              • if their exchange stops converting a given currency, they can convert to one they do accept
              • if their exchange bans their account (e.g. due to the nature of their business), they can switch exchanges
              • there are ATMs that dispense cash for crypto
              • if no exchange will work with them, they can make direct exchanges with regular people (i.e. “launder” the money)
              • they can also spend the currency directly

              There are a ton of options to convert crypto to fiat, there are far fewer to select a different fiat payment processor.

  • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here’s something I’ve noticed. Whenever someone describes a group, individual, activity, or anything else with more than 2 negative adjectives in a row, they’re probably saying something deeply unstable. This is one of those times.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I take offense to this generalization. When I call someone an honorless gormless bitch ass motherfucker I’m relieving stress so when fists start flying I ain’t blinded by my own anger, my instability is only mildly correlated to my verbosity.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let me sit you down when I say this… but if you’re getting into fights even after relieving stress… it either doesn’t work, or you’re behaving in an unstable manner.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh no fights are fun. Tis the curse of my kin, seriously damned near every man on the German side of my family treats fights like a fun time waster. Not saying it’s not instability just that my verbosity is perpetual regardless of my mood or actions, well unless I am physically exhausted then I communicate with a handful of words like a caveman.

          Also just cause I’m somewhat calm going into a fight doesn’t mean that the person I hurled insults at is.

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    The same group who complained Detroit Become Human is bad for glorifying child abuse and women abuse. Yet supported Cuties…

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really goes to show people. It doesn’t matter the religion. They all are bullshit machines for people to act superior than others. Fuck these twat waffles.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    This whole thing smacks of the “anyone who has a sexual proclivity I claim not to share must have all sexual proclivities I claim not to share” logic. i.e. the logic that got gay people flagged as child molesters back in the bad old days. And occasionally still today.

    Such logic might actually be rooted in projection, which is a deeply disturbing thought. Deeply closeted people desperately clinging to heteronormativity and traditional gender roles because they think that if they don’t they they’ll do something abhorrent. Maybe even to someone who can’t consent. Or they already have and they desperately want to hide away from it.

    Yes, for the love of all that’s holy and secular too, ban the games with apparent child sexual abuse. Children can’t consent. Leave everything else the hell alone.

    I don’t even play video games with sexual themes, but I do play ones that contain 18+ violence. I assume those will be next on the chopping block.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tbh, its only a matter of time before the entire organization gets doxxed and the internet does what it does.

    I look forward to eating popcorn when it happens.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    Someone should check this groups computer ls and closets because they are projecting and those fuckers should have no impact on what us Americans or any other country wants to buy. This needs to be reversed Asap.