I don’t think that that equivalence matters here, or that they don’t care that they’re being hypocritical.

We can still enjoy a meme about how they are hypocrites and how their stated beliefs crumble under the smallest pressure.

Switch is good if you only need to compare equals when selecting a value.
Although some languages make it way more powerful, like python match.
but I generally dislike python despite of this, and I generally dislike switch because the syntax and formatting is just too unlike the rest of the languages.

Generally I prefer the clear brevity of:

var foo=
    x>100 ? bar :
    x>50 ? baz :
    x>10 ? qux :
    quux;

Over

var foo;
if(x>100) {
    foo=bar;
} else if(x>50) {
    foo=baz;
} else if(x>10) {
    foo=qux;
} else {
    foo=quux;
}

Which doesn’t really get any better if you remove the optional (but recommended) braces.
Heck, I even prefer ternary over some variations of switch for equals conditionals, like the one in Java:

var foo;
switch(x) {
case 100:
    foo=bar;
    break;
case 50:
    foo=baz;
    break;
case 10:
    foo=qux;
    break;
default:
    foo=quux;
}

But some languages do switch better than others (like python as previously mentioned), so there are certainly cases where that’d probably be preferable even to me.

Hey, when you gotta pick a value from a bunch of options, it’s either if/elseif/else, ternary, switch/case, or a map/dict.

Ternary generally has the easiest to read format of the options, unless you put it all on one line like a crazy person.

Bah

Ternary is just a compressed if-elseif-else chain with a guaranteed assignment.
If you format it like a sane person, or like you would an if/else chain, then it’s way easier to read than if/else chains.

Oh no, their own process that they made for being given a house is so expensive, I feel so bad for them!

Why are you defending them so hard? You just have to look at their quarterly financials. They’re making out like gangbusters.

But if you don’t pay, they get the house. There is no risk of loss, only risk of not maximizing profit.

That’s the impression I get too

But it’s plausibly deniable enough because you can still get decent credit score if you pay off your credit before you pay interest. It’s a numbers game for them, I expect, but still.

you need to pay us interest because we’re taking the risk. Also you need to give us a down payment to offset our risk.

The first time I applied for a loan, I didn’t have a credit card yet. And they were like:

How can we know you’re responsible with money?

Because I haven’t needed credit in the past and I’m still alive, idk? Having enough liquidity to not need credit would seem to suggest I’m good with money.

But maybe your parents are paying for everything

Ok? How does using a credit card change that?

Lest I checked, this was a free country

Say… Can you introduce me to your neighbors?

ButtsMcFarts

“second lunch”

You’re welcome

No, keep proudly displaying your ignorance. We’ve got time.

It’s easy to judge from like 30 minutes in public, until you have an autistic kid and no support network.

My child is autistic.
The only way to get him to be calm in a restaurant was to give him earphones and play something comfortingly familiar.

Now that hes a bit older, it’s a bit better. But he still frequently needs something similar in those kinds of situations.

But you also watched new grounds and shit like goatse

A laser touched me as a kid!

I mean, there are always other options lol

What kind of insane?
Because I wouldn’t mind a few fewer health insurance CEOs 🤔