While basically everything is pointing at that (and basically everyone knows, including even some MAGAts), there is no hard evidence for that at the moment, and if a newspaper mentions such a serious claim they could be sued for that. Now, unfortunately, “but come on, Mr. Judge, we all know that” is both true and unfortunately insufficient for defense. I guess that’s part of the reason they didn’t use his entire face, and they can say it’s just someone whose eyes look similar (it might even be the case, and they might reveal the entire photo). You could also say the smaller letter text under it is unrelated. I guess there is a reason they didn’t mention his name in the big text one, either.
Honestly, even if they got their hands on the Epstein files, a single name entry in a list of invitees might not be sufficient for sentencing him, since simply being there doesn’t immediately mean that you’ve done anything to minors by existing in that location. It is a great material to start a legal process or an investigation, but unless there is an actual photo, video or someone’s confession in it, it won’t stand on its own.
Everyone who you think is on the list is on the list.
Just write all their names down on a piece of paper and say it’s the list, if they want to disprove it they’ll have to release the actual list. Except it won’t, because your fake list will be an accurate representation of the real list.
Correction: convicted felon AND kiddydiddler who should release the List.
While basically everything is pointing at that (and basically everyone knows, including even some MAGAts), there is no hard evidence for that at the moment, and if a newspaper mentions such a serious claim they could be sued for that. Now, unfortunately, “but come on, Mr. Judge, we all know that” is both true and unfortunately insufficient for defense. I guess that’s part of the reason they didn’t use his entire face, and they can say it’s just someone whose eyes look similar (it might even be the case, and they might reveal the entire photo). You could also say the smaller letter text under it is unrelated. I guess there is a reason they didn’t mention his name in the big text one, either.
Honestly, even if they got their hands on the Epstein files, a single name entry in a list of invitees might not be sufficient for sentencing him, since simply being there doesn’t immediately mean that you’ve done anything to minors by existing in that location. It is a great material to start a legal process or an investigation, but unless there is an actual photo, video or someone’s confession in it, it won’t stand on its own.
Everyone who you think is on the list is on the list.
Just write all their names down on a piece of paper and say it’s the list, if they want to disprove it they’ll have to release the actual list. Except it won’t, because your fake list will be an accurate representation of the real list.