As a not quite middle aged dude, I only just now figured out how to see magic eye stuff. I tried a couple times in elementary school but didn’t get it so I stopped. Had a few drinks earlier, stumbled on some magic eye pic that I could see clear as day and it blew my mind a little

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      1·
      3 days ago

      Someone said that they did some research on people who were able to use 3d TVs and 10% couldn’t, or maybe you just haven’t gotten a hang of it yet?

  • Lionheadbud@lemmy.world
    3·
    3 days ago

    I didn’t think I could but interestingly enough discovered a technique that works earlier today. Basically get really close whilst staring at a point then gradually move away. It actually is an amazing effect

  • Tedesche@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    I couldn’t for most of my life, but then I just tried about two years ago and it clicked. I’ve been able to ever since. It’s a cognitive skill. Once you learn it, it’s like riding a bike. I hate to make it sound as exclusive as it is, because that’s what turned me off of it to begin with, but it really is true. Just figure it out and it’s like a code that you can decode at will.

  • Hugin@lemmy.world
    7·
    3 days ago

    Yes. They require stereoscopic vision. When I was doing research on 3D displays about 10% of subjects had to be rejected because they were stereo blind. They had no idea they were that way.

    One woman said that explains why she had the nickname clunk in high school. She had a habit of rearending cars.

    • Bwaz@lemmy.world
      2·
      3 days ago

      I’m one of the stereo blind. I was kind of glad when I found out from the eye doctor. It explained why I could rarely catch a baseball without getting hit.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 days ago

        So depending on why you might be able to train it. If you don’t have a lazy eye and have good vision you may want to look into it.

        If your brain is just not fusing two good images there is a good chance you can train it to do so. Having done experiments in this field I can tell you it makes a measurable difference in performance.

        A good read on the subject is below. The part where she first sees a tree in 3D is a good example of what you are missing.

        Fixing My Gaze: A Scientist’s Journey Into Seeing in Three Dimensions by Susan R Barry

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    2·
    3 days ago

    I can

    My tip is to try to look past the picture, like you’re focusing on something 10ft behind the wall. Then squint your eyes.

  • morphballganon@lemmy.world
    7·
    4 days ago

    Yes.

    The instructions say don’t cross your eyes but that’s horseshit and probably why so many people fail to see them.

    My method is to cross my eyes, then uncross them slowly until the 3d effect appears, then hold on that position.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    6·
    4 days ago

    Someone made a modified version of Quake back in the day, that rendered to stereoscopic 3D in a white noise pattern.

    It was such a mindfuck to play!

    You get 3D depth but no colors or shades or contrast. It’s just shapes moving. So doors that were flush with the wall were impossible to see, but enemies in dark rooms were fully visible because there is no light or dark.

    I like to imagine I got to experience what a bat sees with echolocation.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    3·
    3 days ago

    I can somewhat move my eyes independently. I credit this skill to us having had magic eyes books as a kid and I just learned to control eye muscles willingly.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    3 days ago

    Absolutely loved them as a kid! Had a quite a few books.

    You can do them two different ways. The normal way with the object popping out towards you and an inverted way with crossing your eyes that inverts the shape.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        4 days ago

        Bring the page close to your nose, let your eyes kinda naturally loose focus from distance. Then slowly start to pull the page back and you should get it.

        Kinda difficult to describe.

        Check back when you are sober and see if you get it to work.

        • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
          3·
          4 days ago

          Maybe I have it mixed up then because the way I’m doing it is losing focus and letting it adjust until I see something. I thought I was going crosseyed but I didn’t have a mirror so I can’t be sure.

          • asmoranomar@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            4 days ago

            The way this works is that the image is designed to appear ‘beyond’ the surface it is printed on. It’s much easier to relax your eyes and pretend you’re looking at what’s ‘behind’ the paper. Kind of like 3d chalk art on the road in a way.

            The other way of crossing your eyes works because you’re swapping the left and right eye, which gives a different, inverted appearance. Instead of a foreground image popping out of the background, it looks like the other way. Like looking in a box, kinda.

            I can do both, but the latter is more difficult, sometimes requires a specific distance, and can be painful if you force it. If the image is too big, you may only be able to see a part of it. I think the first method is easier to do and to learn/train. Either way, you aren’t looking at what’s ‘on the surface’.

            …

            The best way I can explain is: pretend you’re sitting on the toilet, really tired and you have nothing to look at so you just lose focus and gaze at random stuff. When the tiles or cracks start to make pictures that aren’t there, that’s kind of the effect you want.

              • asmoranomar@lemmy.worldEnglish
                2·
                3 days ago

                Oh that one is a good one, it’s very busy. Using the first method the trees are on the ‘bottom’ and everything progressively pops out with the fish/turtle on ‘top’.

                The other way is reverse, the trees are on the ‘top’ and the fish are on the ‘bottom’ (like I’m looking in that ‘box’). It’s also really hard to see the whole picture this way, but that’s just me.

                Also, ‘In a Box’ might not be the best analogy, you can make one that intentionally feels like you’re looking inside something – it’s just that most of these are made to pop out at you.

          • BroBot9000@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            4 days ago

            For the cross eye version you just need to hold out the page at normal viewing distance and cross your eyes till the 3d image pops.

            Sounds like you are doing it the regular way. Which is the more difficult one for most people that have issues with magic eyes.

            Glad you got to experience them!

              • BroBot9000@lemmy.worldEnglish
                2·
                3 days ago

                Here’s another one for ya! If you do it the right way you’ll clearly see the turtles head pop out towards you and with the cross eye way it’s quite difficult to recognize the head when it’s pushed backwards.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          4 days ago

          This works, but the quicker method for me was to hold the book over my head, out of my line of sight while I focused my eyes on something a little farther away (a few feet away is fine). Then you can simply move the book downward into your field of vision while refusing to let your eyes refocus. It should be blurry, because you’re still focusing past it, despite it being right in front of your face. Then just relax and let your brain do the work.

          This method got by far the quickest and most reliable results for me, most pop suddenly into view in just a couple seconds.

          I think this method works best because you’re using established muscle memory to focus your eyes on an object at a measurable, consistent distance, and then just not letting them change. Removes several variables from the equation.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      2·
      4 days ago

      I think I usually saw the inverted version. I could make out the shapes, but they never popped out.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    1·
    3 days ago

    I had a friend who couldn’t see them and the following explanation is how I got her to be able to:

    1. Stand two arm lengths from the picture, holding you arm out in front of you with one finger up, so that your finger is halfway between you and the picture and lined up with near the bottom of it (or you could use any distance and put your finger halfway there).

    2. Both the picture and your finger should now be in your field of view. Focus on the tip of your finger. Maintain your eyes in that focus state and shift your attention from your finger to the picture, remembering not to let your eyes change their focus.

    3. Once you have your eyes stuck into that focus length you should be able to move them around and view all parts of the picture seeing the 3D effect. But if you still have problems you can move your finger to keep it in front of your eyes and in focus while you move your eyes, but you’ll quickly learn how to keep them in the correct state with a little practice.

    This also works if you focus on twice the distance of the picture, but most people find the half-distance focus easier.

  • kaotic@lemmy.world
    2·
    3 days ago

    I can see the 3D, but struggle to put together what they are sometimes because I don’t have colors to put the image together.