cannedtuna@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoThis guy’s a real Upstart if you ask melemmy.worldimagemessage-square175linkfedilinkarrow-up1763
arrow-up1763imageThis guy’s a real Upstart if you ask melemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square175linkfedilink
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·3 months agoGood news is that systemd is not incorporating age verification just like they are not incorporating name verification. Both name and birth date are just userdb fields with no verification at all.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoNo. A database doesn’t have these specific fields by default.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-21 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoThis field appeared in LDAP for different reasons, than age control.
minus-squaremabeledo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago systemd devs successfully rage baited you and a bunch of others Should that be their goal?
minus-squareanyhow2503@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoIt isn’t. I’m pretty sure the dev working on that userdb field didn’t plan on getting death threats on github and said as much afterwards.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago Neither does systemd. They are optional. Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously implemented those fields. And in a DB that’s not the case.
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoJust as complicit as for name verification. 🤷♀️
Good news is that systemd is not incorporating age verification just like they are not incorporating name verification.
Both name and birth date are just userdb fields with no verification at all.
There are complicits.
deleted by creator
No. A database doesn’t have these specific fields by default.
deleted by creator
This field appeared in LDAP for different reasons, than age control.
deleted by creator
Should that be their goal?
It isn’t. I’m pretty sure the dev working on that userdb field didn’t plan on getting death threats on github and said as much afterwards.
Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously implemented those fields.
And in a DB that’s not the case.
Just as complicit as for name verification. 🤷♀️