We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.

Then retrain on that.

Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.

Source.

More Context

Source.

Source.

  • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    5 days ago

    adding missing information and deleting errors

    Which is to say, “I’m sick of Grok accurately portraying me as an evil dipshit, so I’m going to feed it a bunch of right-wing talking points and get rid of anything that hurts my feelings.”

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is definitely how I read it.

      History can’t just be ‘rewritten’ by A.I. and taken as truth. That’s fucking stupid.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    Elon Musk, like most pseudo intellectuals, has a very shallow understanding of things. Human knowledge is full of holes, and they cannot simply be resolved through logic, which Mush the dweeb imagines.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    “If we take this 0.84 accuracy model and train another 0.84 accuracy model on it that will make it a 1.68 accuracy model!”

    ~Fucking Dumbass

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    So they’re just going to fill it with Hitler’s world view, got it.

    Typical and expected.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    I never would have thought it possible that a person could be so full of themselves to say something like that

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I elaborated below, but basically Musk has no idea WTF he’s talking about.

    If I had his “f you” money, I’d at least try a diffusion or bitnet model (and open the weights for others to improve on), and probably 100 other papers I consider low hanging fruit, before this absolutely dumb boomer take.

    He’s such an idiot know it all. It’s so painful whenever he ventures into a field you sorta know.

    But he might just be shouting nonsense on Twitter while X employees actually do something different. Because if they take his orders verbatim they’re going to get crap models, even with all the stupid brute force they have.

  • JustAPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    The thing that annoys me most is that there have been studies done on LLMs where, when trained on subsets of output, it produces increasingly noisier output.

    Sources (unordered):

    Whatever nonsense Muskrat is spewing, it is factually incorrect. He won’t be able to successfully retrain any model on generated content. At least, not an LLM if he wants a successful product. If anything, he will be producing a model that is heavily trained on censored datasets.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s not so simple, there are papers on zero data ‘self play’ or other schemes for using other LLM’s output.

      Distillation is probably the only one you’d want for a pretrain, specifically.

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Whatever. The next generation will have to learn to trust whether the material is true or not by using sources like Wikipedia or books by well-regarded authors.

    The other thing that he doesn’t understand (and most “AI” advocates don’t either) is that LLMs have nothing to do with facts or information. They’re just probabilistic models that pick the next word(s) based on context. Anyone trying to address the facts and information produced by these models is completely missing the point.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Thinking wikipedia or other unbiased sources will still be available in a decade or so is wishful thinking. Once the digital stranglehold kicks in, it’ll be mandatory sign-in with gov vetted identity provider and your sources will be limited to what that gov allows you to see. MMW.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wikipedia is quite resilient - you can even put it on a USB drive. As long as you have a free operating system, there will always be ways to access it.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I keep a partial local copy of Wikipedia on my phone and backup device with an app called Kiwix. Great if you need access to certain items in remote areas with no access to the internet.

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes. There will be no websites only AI and apps. You will be automatically logged in to the apps. Linux, Lemmy will be baned. We will be classed as hackers and criminals. We probably have to build our own mesh network for communication or access it from a secret location.

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Dude is gonna spend Manhattan Project level money making another stupid fucking shitbot. Trained on regurgitated AI Slop.

    Glorious.

    • D_C@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ll have you know he’s seeing a medical professional at least once a day. Sometimes multiple times!!!

      (On an absolutely and completely unrelated note ketamine dealers are medical professionals, yeah?)