• LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era

    Oh no…

    The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.

    Okay, Digg has my cautious attention…

    Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.

    And they lost me.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What’s wrong with AI summaries? AI has it’s uses. A long as it’s just adding some metadata I don’t see nothing wrong with it.

      For me the big questions is what are they going to do to stop bots, spam and internet points farming. So far they didn’t reveal any plans.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The thing that’s mostly wrong with AI summaries is that people don’t click through to the page the summary summarizes. So those sites don’t get ad revenue. That’s ad revenue is the backbone of the internet for a lot of sites. If there’s no site posting the information then the AI has nothing to summarize and provide an overview of. The pivot to AI LLM’s is likely to kill the companies who aggregate links, and they’re pushing for it hoping to make it profitable in the long term because they’ve been actively enshittifying ad aggregation via search for the purposes of big number must go up (you know, for the shareholders). It’s defeatist to the current business model of most of the internet. And the shareholders do not care so long as they get their money.

        • ExLisperA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There are summaries of articles on lemmy, just not generated by LMMs. What’s the difference?

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 minutes ago

            Depends. I often click on articles based on the summary because the article link is usually posted before the summary is. Sometimes the summary doesn’t really explain enough for me to understand. Other times I want to know more. But when you use chatgpt to answer a query usually you don’t leave that page in order to get more information and that’s the problem I’m pointing out. Usually you don’t even have a link to where the information in the summary came from either (my experience is limited to Google’s Gemini, which I don’t use, but which for a while was front and center on any query I typed in).