• k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What’s “it”? His products? I couldn’t find the number in the wiki.

    Edit: thank you guys! It didn’t occur to be that it’s actually the cash, that’s crazy!

    • vrek@programming.dev
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      In reality it was actual cash money. He couldn’t use banks due to his money being gained through illegal means. He had stacks of money just laying around so much he couldn’t really secure it. Columbia is generally warm and humid so a lot of pests like rats and insects. I heard he was spending around 10k a week just on rubber bands to wrap the money into stacks of a thousands.

      If you don’t know he made most of his money by selling cocaine though.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cash. His business was illegal (naturally), and it was the 1980s, so most of his profits were in literal cash that could not really be safely put in banks in the amounts he was bringing it in. So much of it was physically stored and hidden in various safehouses… and sometimes, vermin and the elements would get at it, destroying or rotting the paper money beyond usability.

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, his literal bank notes. Due to the nature of his business he hid his money wherever he could and a percentage of it was lost to environmental factors.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      $2.1B a year

      $420M a week

      I don’t think that’s 10%.

        • ExLisperA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re technically correct. The best kind of correct.

          • x00z@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think this is technically more correct:

            365.25 / 7 = 52.178571429
            52.178571429 * 420,000,000 = 21,915,000,000
            (2,100,000,000 / 21,915,000,000) * 100 = 9.582477755
            

            Which means it’s 9.58% rounded down to 2 decimals.

            (This is using the common definition of a year and not a “tropical year”)

            • ptu@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes, but losing 10% of an asset typically refers to total asset value, not revenue.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                We’re not even including losses on the cocaine itself, this is all just about the revenue. He didn’t lose 10% of his business every year.

                • ptu@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I read it that he lost a significant part if his cash assets. Revenue is a different concept. In your calculation you made the comparison with revenue.

  • MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s about 21 billion a year (assuming 2 weeks for holidays because 50 is easier to multiply than 52, and 21 is a nicer number than 21.84).