Come see why you’re all wrong sore losers, here in a lenghty rantarticle I explain why AI is so good and is going to replace you all:
Hey thats my website! Gemini, call the police!
You rang? (My user’s name in my laptop is gemini, and in my home pc, and anywhere i use my flake really), btw check out my terminal cool right?:
It doesnt look right in the tty though, i havent bothered to make it change the characters for some it can print, i use oh-my-posh btw, and fish.
So did you call the police yet?
Ah shit i forgot , i was too focused on my terminal
Every breath you take starts playing on the background…
I love the https and port 80 combo. Really sells the incompetence.
That’s what makes it obvious that this person has been around the block. Or a few blocks.
Should have been brought round back.
That page is filthy. You should be ashamed of yourself.
pointing to 80 port was the salt in the wound, i presume?
With https no less
Theres too many s’s in https
vibes = vibes-3 if (outage) { fix() }Coding is so easy
They just forgot to include “no bugs” in the prompt.
You know what’s funny?
I use AI to develop software. However when I’m looking for libraries to do things if I see a CLAUDE.md file I have to look and see when it was added and hold it against the library if it’s early in the history.
It’s like prewar steel.
I also recognize it’s hypocritical.
I love this sabotage. Has this worked against anyone that you know of yet?
Interesting. I’m unfamiliar with the purpose of that file as originally intended, but if I understand it right, it probably can be used to detect PRs with ai-made code. Tell Claude to write a particular string in every PR, and then reject all PRs with that string.
It’s the difference between checking for questions in stack overflow and implementing solutions VS pasting every SO solution blindly until something works.
I do use autocomplete and ask plenty questions, sometimes even use an agent so it makes small changes that I then review and test, but I would never commit unchecked changes, and a claude.md implies that the AI is coding AND committing without supervision.
I can’t stress enough how different those scenarios are.
It’s not hypocritical. Because you use AI to code, you know how easy it is to just let the AI do it’s thing and not check it’s work. It’s almost like a sirens song. So you know the odds that a library that was coded with AI probably wasn’t checked by a human. That’s just called experience.
Positive diff? Pfft, amateurs. If I ever see even a 1000 line PR I’m instantly rejecting and closing it. Learn to code, not generate bullshit.
1000 lines isn’t that unreasonable for a PR. Commit size matters more.
Live by the vibes, die by the vibes.
I’m pretty sure the shitty Windows upgrades as of late has been vibecoded as well.
ms themselves confirmed it, “bragging” that 30% of windows updates are written by ai
What could go wrong?
I like that this is lowkey a Polymarket Advertisement too. The internet truly is a wonderous place.
Look mommy, I made big poo poo.
that’s good, mandatory meetings always (ALWAYS) solve the problem! /s
People who share the size of a codechange as a mark of how effective ai coding agents are truly missing the point of code changes.
Number of lines of code written is a shitty metric to measure productivity.
In college, on the first day of orientation, someone in my class bragged that they wrote 50,000 lines of code for a game that was similar to tic tac toe, emphasizing that he “wrote a lot of code”. A TA told him that it wasn’t a sign that his program was decent and that it really didn’t seem like it should take 50k lines of code to make something as simple as his game.
He dropped out after the first week of intro to programming.
That’s nothing, I wrote the code to return if the input is even or not in 1M lines of code.
And yet I experience it so often. That or “effort points” as the metric being used to determine who all stars are.
Either as a metric just encourages gaming of the system:
- Why write one line when I can write the same thing in 20?
- Why take this one effort point task I think will take three when I can just skip it and grab these one effort points I think will take 20 minutes?
I’ve been on teams that on the surface didn’t have these metrics matter, but the top effort points achiever got bonuses on the DL.
What did you do?? You refacted the code and now it’s better organized but you overall got rid of lines?
I’ll set up a PMD meeting to help you out of this problem, but fair to say don’t expect a raise or a bonus this year.
I wouldn’t say PR size is a bad metric, you usually just need yo read it the opposite of how sloppers do it, i.e. the most productive PRs are short and focused.
Then Devs focus on minifying the code into an unreadable mess
I’m just a hobbyist, but I’m always more proud of commits that remove stuff.
Removing shit and it still working perfectly the same is absolutely a goal everyone should have. Less code means less to maintain.
This. Code is a liability not an asset
Didn’t you hear? We’re going back to KLOC for measurement of productivity.
If we’re going back to the 80s, do we at least get the company provided cocaine?
deleted by creator
Slop points aside, I found 5.4 to be pretty ass compared to 5.3 codex. Took way longer and wasted more tokens.
more tokens
= more money for Amazon = more profitssss.
I think my least favorite part of Lemmy is all the posted screenshots of tweets. It just took me 3 tries to get to these comments.
What benefit do tweet screenshots serve?
I know what context they are looking at and I don’t need to make a twitter account to view the relevant replies.
deleted by creator
I use AI to reduce my overly complex shite and automate making boilerplate stuff I can’t be bothered with.
I’d never ever just let it run roughshod over the whole code base unattended.
I just make some shell scripts to automate boilerplate.
That way, once I have properly debugged it, I know it will give the correct output everytime in the future and I don’t need to keep checking it.
