• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nor have I said that you have.

    You’ve just pretended like it is true, despite the overwhelming lack of data showing any kind of mechanism for it.

    You just like thinking women are better marksmen. Despite there being no proof.

    It’s okay, many people are religious.

    Results: The results of the study indicated that men scored higher than women in pistol events and that no performance differences were found in rifle events when the whole group was compared.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068418/

    And these precision competitions utilise air rifles, which are much lighter in weight and recoil than “proper” firearms.

    Notice how I’m still not claiming men are better shooters.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Hey, if you have to delude yourself that women are “great marksmen” for some weird reason you can’t even identify, then you go girl.

            Just don’t expect the rest of the world to partake in your delusions. :)

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Hey you do you. If you want to believe in things which aren’t true, despite knowing that there is no science for them, you’re allowed to.

                But we all know that’s what you’re doing, since the science simply doesn’t exist. Does it bother you so when I point that out…?