Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, was tapped to assume control of the country by Iran’s Assembly of experts, Iranian International reported Tuesday.

Motjaba is known for a staunch adherence to his father’s hardline conservatism, and has close ties to Iran’s notoriously brutal Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps military body, according to CNN.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    4 months ago

    America and Israel’s attack almost certainly snuffed out the rebellion in Iran, especially after they bombed a school full of children.

    People aren’t going to overthrow the local authorities when a foreign country unilaterally decides to attack their country and even targets their children.

    I expect this had the exact opposite effect of what the Trump administration claimed to desire.

    Then again, I seriously doubt that the real objective of the Pedo War was ever related to Iran itself.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen some reporting that claims the US and Israel is bombing leftist opposition in Iran. And arming Kurdish militants. Seems like they just want Iran completely destabilized.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think the US killing civilians drives Iranian rebels back into philosophical alignment with their government, but certainly it’s hard to get a protest together when the US is bombing.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Discontent only turns into Revolution when enough people voice it and act on it, as they feed each other’s confidence in changing things eventually turning into a critical mass for change.

        An external enemy that attacks for no reason, more so one which is so murderous and immoral that they would mass kill children, will make a lot of people not voice their discontent with the only structure capable of unifying them in defense against the external agreessor, much less act against it.

        Then on top of that, that murderous foreign aggressor has actually voiced their the desire for said Revolution.

        If before in Iran voicing opposition to the regime might actually inspire others to also voice their own discontent, now it will inspire others to attack that person for doing what that foreign aggressor wants.

        So what before was growing into a critical mass for change amongst the general population has now been rolled back into what is most small groups of like-minded extremelly anti-regime individuals surrounded by a general population that sees them as working for a foreign aggressor which is so evil that they blew up a school full of children.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        An exterior threat can have a rally-around-the-flag effect. They hate the administration, but now they see an even bigger threat, a foreign threat. They might not want to rock the boat now.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I suppose this is true. I have more criticisms than praise for my home country, the US, but when I hear people outside it criticize it in a hostile way, my first reflex is not to agree with them, it’s more like “hey fuck you.”

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I used the expression “claimed to desire” for a reason.

        What Trump (or, in fact anybody in his administration) says and reality are totally unrelated things which at the best of times are about as related as boats which pass each other in a thick fog.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    Motjaba is known for a staunch adherence to his father’s hardline conservatism

    So all we have managed to accomplish in the last week of bombing Iran is kill a bunch of civilians and get the younger but just as hard line version Ayatollah Khamenei?

    Excellent, very good.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was a knee-jerk response to the Trump-Epstein files scandal…I mean…uhh…I meant to say…they’ve been planning this for months.

      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not everything has to do with Epstein, you know.

        Israel saw this as an opportunity to kill parts of the Iranian leadership and couldn’t resist. The US just joined in so Trump could win another FIFA peace price.

        • hightrix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re right. Not everything does.

          But this war is a distraction from the Epstein files. Operation Epstein Fury.

    • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      We also managed to take out a vast amount of ballistic missiles, their launchers, air defense, aircraft, boats and regime related infrastructure and the whole top 40 in the chain of command.

  • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    Imagine if Don Jr was the new president after Trump. That’s what this is. America is bombing the cities where the reformist (think liberals in america) live. Traditionalists live in the rural areas (like in the US maga lives in the boonies). Their MAGA just elected their Don Jr. No one in the sticks is dying over there.

    • thesdev@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is no conservative vs progressive dynamic in Iran, because there are no free elections in Iran.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Check this report out:

        Vice travels to Iran

        Anecdotally: As a child I was close friends with the child of a progressive Iranian woman who left Iran to be free in America. She’s not Muslim (her parents were), and sent her son to a Baptist church with me for after school activities.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even without free elections, you are going to have that same dynamic present.

        • thesdev@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What I meant by that was that you don’t have liberal states like California versus conservative ones like Florida, because you don’t get to elect Newsom versus DeSantis. In other words people don’t move to Tehran for trans rights or free daycare, they move there because that’s where the majority of jobs are. So labeling Tehran as “where the reformists live” doesn’t make sense to me as someone who has lived there for 25 years.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ah, ok. I do wonder if at least the general divide between people opting to stay out of Tehran verus in the city is there with respect to being against or for the government. I could believe a bunch of people just want to make a living, but of those that support or reject the government, is there a divide between rural and urban?

            • thesdev@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I would say generally they are more religious which somewhat correlates with backing the regime. But then again, I wouldn’t categorize anywhere as a conservative or liberal stronghold.

              • jj4211@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think the lens of “conservative” versus “liberal” is a fairly narrow and contextual one in general anyway… It’s ‘good enough’ in American politics but even then…

  • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    The son of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is the frontrunner to replace him as supreme leader, according to reports.

    He is not selected yet, according to your linked article. Your post title says he is elected according to reports.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    So Iran turned into another gulf monarch dictatorship just like the rest of US allies. Task failed successfully.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Despite having a very similar sounding last name, Ali Khamenei (the guy who was just killed) wasn’t related to his predecessor, Ruhollah Khomeini. These two guys have been the only leaders of Iran since the revolution so it is actually a change to pick someone’s son for the job, but it is still an election by clerics rather than a strict hereditary monarchy.

        • SpicyWizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, but nothing actually changed then. Like you said it was an election by clerics, it just happened that they decided to choose his son.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well they’ve just seen what happened to the last guy. They didn’t want the job themselves…

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        You see how that’s NOT election right? That’s just a group of elites appointing an heir.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          He’s not a king, dude. I don’t love their system of government, where they give any share of power to religious representatives… but it is their system. They also do have elections for parliament and president. I don’t know much more than that, but it’s not like the ayatollah is an absolute monarch.

        • iglou@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          An election is not necessarily something done by the people. What you’re thinking of is called “universal suffrage”.

          • mstrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            He wasn’t elected, rumors are that the clerics were pressured to vote for the son of the supreme leader…

            • iglou@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well that’s something else, but it doesnt change the fact thaft an election can be a small group of people electing a nation leader.

              • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Yeah.

                Election of the pope.

                Election of the chair.

                Those elections are done by a small group of people.

  • redbrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    So the orange likes to get young blood into power for longevity of his ideas…I’m guessing this was his plan all along? I would also imagine if Russia weren’t preoccupied with Zelensky, he’d be all over this?

  • not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    that’s an odd choice considering the iranian revolutions ideology is founded on anti hereditary succession

    i think it’s a mistake for them