Crockett was reportedly the GOP’s preferred opponent in the 2026 Senate elections in Texas, but had not been considered as a potential contender in the race by her own party

The Republican Party allegedly promoted favorable polls about Representative Jasmine Crockett as part of a plan to goad the outspoken Democrat into running for the Senate.

Crockett was reportedly the GOP’s preferred opponent in the 2026 race in Texas, but had not been considered as a potential contender in the race by her fellow Democrats.

That prompted Senate Republicans to disseminate a poll in July suggesting that she would be the frontrunner in the Democratic primary.

“When we saw the results, we were like, ‘OK, we got to disseminate this far and wide,’” a source familiar with the plan told NOTUS.

  • s1ndr0m3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m glad she is running. I think both Dem candidates are equally matched. A competitive primary might bring out more voters in the general.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know about Crockett. She’s taken money from AIPAC.

      There’s a reason why the Republicans want her to be the Dem nominee.

      She’s been good on some subjects, but there’s that nagging doubt.

      If there were no better option then yes, vote for her. But there is a better option.

        • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          She said something to the effect of (and I am paraphrasing heavily, because I don’t retain politicianese) we must stand by are allies at all costs, and if our allies are committing genocide, instead of dropping that ally we should become pro genocide.

          Even if she’s not paid, at best she’s a useful idiot

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          She has all the policy positions one would have if they’re 💯 in the bag for AIPAC.

          She’s like Chuck Schumer level pro Israel.

          • baronvonj@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I see that https://www.trackaipac.com/ says she’s pro-Israel, but even they don’t indicate she’s received any money. I’m just saying if there’s no proof that she’s taken AIPAC money then stop using that as a talking point against her. Use her voting record and statements, things that are verifiable.

        • daannii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          My understanding was no direct aipac but indirect. And she went on an Israel visit a few years back. She has also made multiple pro Israel statements including a denial of genocide and says Israel will always be funded by the u.s.

          • baronvonj@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I see that https://www.trackaipac.com/ says she’s pro-Israel, but even they don’t indicate she’s received any money. I’m just saying if there’s no proof that she’s taken AIPAC money then stop using that as a talking point against her. Use her voting record and statements, things that are verifiable.

            • daannii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah her voting record. She has always voted to send them money.

              I’m actually a little more forgiving on that because most of those bills also included funds for other countries that really needed it. Like Haiti.

              And the way it works is sometimes you have to compromise on one thing to get the thing you want. That’s “politics” … or at least how it’s been played here for a century.

              But consistently always voting to send money to Israel plus making pro Israel statements certainly clarified any alternate motivation for her votes to send Israel money.

              It wasn’t a compromise-situation.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        She also defended that woman who was taking phone call text orders from Epstein during his hearing.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think both candidates are alright, but I feel like too many folks forget exactly where they’re running. It’s Texas. Good ‘ole boys and church goin’ folks livin’ out in the middle of nowhere. The more we can remind them of what Jesus supposedly said and did, the better, and Talarico is the man that’s doing that. If he can fool ‘em all into voting for a democrat, that just means fewer repuglicunts in office, and more chances to move the Overton window back to the left.

    • beelzebum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Texas has a population of about 30m. 20m of that is in the Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin MSAs.

      • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Right, but the vast majority of districts are gerrymandered to hell and back, leaving the state purple at best when in all actuality it’s actually very, very blue. Short of somehow convincing our state legislators to undo all the gerrymandering, the next best thing to do is convince all the rest of the repuglicunts to change their views and start voting blue.

        Y’know, or just shoot all the stupid motherfuckers that have been continually running this state into the ground in the fucking face. One of the two.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or more likely another Fetterman Dino elected who get’s a chance to be the rotating villain for why the demos just couldn’t codify roe v wade the next time they get a majority. Give me Crockett.

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    She shall not run against Talarico in Democratic primaries, this is a huge mistake of hers

    Americans need more people like her and James running against GOP and not clashing with each other at Dems primaries

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, you don’t get it. Democrats need robust primaries, it’s the only way to get robust candidates. We need to stop acting like anyone who gets elected once deserves that seat for life.

      Every race should have a primary challenger!

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree. It’s not like Crockett and Talarico are hurling mud at each other, they are very civil (so far). A primary where the candidates agree on the fundamentals and it’s just about who is going to better represent that in Washington seems like a great contest,one in which all participant can come out winners.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Talarico is letting LoneStar PAC hurl the mud at Crockett so he can play the “good Christian”. Their ads are shameful and gross.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I found out the local trump agenda guy has file a lawsuit against the person running against him. The problem for him so far is that every judge has recused themselves from it. Including the special Judiciary appointed by our maga mouth piece governor. Dude is sending hate mail on her.