• IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    “Apple News underrepresents made-up “news”, according to - checks notes - this study we’ve made up.”

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      I want to make a set up of RSS to pull stories and ollama to summarize them into a daily newspaper.

      Last time I tried RSS bare there’s so much cruft because all sites put out a ton of SEO garbage hoping for ad revenue and google sempai to notice them that I need something to wade through the garbage.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    and here i thought busineeses had freedom of speech and the absolute right to control what appears on their platform.

  • WhirlpoolBrewer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    What is the best place for news? I feel like Lemmy is where I get my news. I’m wondering if I should be paying for a news service like ground news or something. These journalists should be paid for the work they do, and I feel like I’m not doing that as of right now. I’m using Adnauseum, so technically every ad is getting clicked then blocked, so the site may actually get some ad revenue, but I’m wondering if a paid news service is the right thing to do. If Apple news is wrong, and Google news is wrong, what is right? Or perhaps what is least wrong?

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      PR Newswire, Reuters, Associated Press tend to be the most straight forward sources to get news with minimum editorial content added.