• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So reading what was posted my concern is that medical startups that sell it properly aren’t prepared for several decades of supporting it.

    I’m quite supportive of disability assisting technology and the ability to use machines to connect the brain to the body or prostheses are things I’m generally in favor of (when the disabled are consulted and listened to).

    Now, Elon’s cyberpunk nightmare version of this where minds and computers are swapping thoughts directly? No, I’m not on board with that. Fortunately it doesn’t seem to be anywhere near the horizon.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bidirectional is a “hell no.” One-directional I can get on board with, though I don’t like the idea of my thoughts being available to anyone else. Minimal interface where I can control typing of a keyboard or drive a car or whatever, sure. I don’t want anything that can read ALL of my thoughts, because once that thing is connected to the internet then you know it’ll be monetized and weaponized.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is simultaneously the most promising and most dangerous tech imaginable. There are so many amazing and wonderful things it could enable. There are so many horrifying and terrible ways it could go wrong. It has to be approached with utmost caution and incredibly well thought out regulation and standards. I’m not sure I trust any government or institution in existence in the world currently to manage it the way it needs to be.

    • ExLisperA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of course you’re right but everyone will still just buy it from Temu and use it to watch funny cat videos and cute dances. “My recommendations are so great now! It’s like they can read my mind!”.