• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    196
    ·
    10 days ago

    Hear me out. Maybe, if you are a parent, its your duty to keep an eye on your child, and exert some control over the spaces and people they interact with?

    • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      10 days ago

      Conservatives have been using the “think of the children line” to justify Draconian overeach for years. All while simultaneously doing everything in their power to take away programs that help children.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        10 days ago

        Let’s not act like the dems don’t do some of the same shit.

        And no I’m not both sidesing this shit…just saying that the dems/left uses this reasoning a lot as well.

        • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Minnesota recently used their tax on billionaires to expand education and provide free lunch to children so while the party isn’t perfect they are not at all comparable.

          What makes them so similar is first pass the post it guarantees a two party system and the practice of gerrymandering creating safe seats. The worst Democrats are the ones with the safest seats. If you want positive change start there.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            We’re talking about trying to pass legislation in the name of “think of the children” logic. KOSA is a fairly recent one that is from the dems.

            • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              Oh I know but anytime someone starts saying that they’re very alike I need to remind people that they really aren’t because these upcoming elections will be a fight for survival

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Yes it’s an important fight for survival. Which is why the dems will nominate a bunch of corporatists who have been scorned by trump. Let the “good” money back into politics and “save the kids” my benevolent billionaires who are noble and just!!

                • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  This is why we need to push for progressives, it’s the only card we have left. Look at the last year if you want to see what not playing gets you.

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              Average age of Lemmy is too low to remember the democrats always managed to support the war on drugs. Save the children indeed. Think of the children is just the go-to bipartisan reasoning for bad legislation

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          You’re mostly correct, but Dems are not left in any political paradigm with the slightest awareness of the existence of non-American countries.

      • AvailableFill74@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        political parties aren’t real. Their only purpose is market segmentation.

        It doesn’t matter which teams win in sports, billionaires own all the leagues.

    • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 days ago

      Absofucking- lutely!

      My 12 year old has zero unsupervised access to the internet. Zero. “But they’ll suffer sociallly!”

      Will they? My son has tons of friends and they play sports and Nerf guns. And, he can read. A whole chapter book, on his own, without prompting.

      Suffer socially, ask the “incels” who have recovered if the internet access they had as teens “helped them socially”.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 days ago

        My nephew plays lots of on online games. My sister checks in with me to make sure that he is both playing games that are appropriate for him, and with people who are appropriate to play with. We’ve setup a discord specifically for him and his friends, and the account he uses is actually my sister’s account, on her own device, so she has direct control over what communities he’s on in discord, who he talks to, and what content he is exposed to.

        He is not allowed to play public lobby games with out her supervision, or a trusted “chaperone” (one of many IRL friend and family members) being in the lobby with him. This is as much about protecting him from harmful content, as it is about teaching him proper gaming etiquette. He was showing some toxic behaviors (greifing mainly) and I shut that down pretty quick.

      • hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        My kids had full internet use with only porn and advertising blocking, except for “homework time”, as well as no restrictions on video games (except for fucking Roblox). They recently graduated high-school at the top of their class and continue doing great in university.

        They grew up to be nice, well-rounded young men who make friends easily, aren’t assholes, aren’t glued to their cell phones (which they had since they were little), don’t mindlessly watch TV, can easily switch tasks and “buckle down” when they have to, and have a great work ethic. They grew up with the attitude that internet/cell phones are tools, not rewards or distractions. Once they hit high-school I found I no longer needed to monitor them (and it was starting to feel creepy and invasive). When they had to study they studied, on their own without prompting or timers.

        I had no worries because I know how to read papers, and there was (and still is) ABSOLUTELY ZERO evidence that doing so would be harming, but in fact the reverse is true.

        Kids grow up to be like their parents. Don’t want them to be assholes? Then don’t be an asshole. Want them to grow up with a reading habit? Then read for yourself. It’s that easy.

        It’s interesting to see that their friends who had strict internet/gaming rules ended up turning into complete shitheads they no longer associate with.

        • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Lot of pride here… Good for you?

          Kids don’t always grow up to be their parents. I found such a broad statement to put such a sour taste in my mouth when I read it.

          Feels pretty privledged, and like, good for you, but damn this statement … Is very broad, dare I say arrogant. Plenty of good kids come from shitty people and vice versa.

          Anyway, enjoy your adult kids and thanks for sharing

      • 7101334@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I feel like it will be more common to heavily restrict the tech access of children as people who actually grew up using the internet become parents.

        I also plan to restrict my (future hypothetical) children from internet access until 13 or so, depending on maturity. So your comment gives me some optimism in that regard.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 days ago

      The conservative belief is that children are basically property and as such can be used for hard labor and kept from appropriate healthcare… But then when it comes to porn, Big Government has to do everything for them.

      Nobody ever said it was a consistent ideology.

    • John@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      So are you for or against mass surveillance veiled as “child safety”?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        I hear you. I guess shitty parents is a good enough reason to let a company monetize your PII for a bit before they (or one of their customers) gets hacked and dumps to the dark web.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 days ago

            Ah, so maybe shitty parents isn’t a good enough reason to let a company monetize and eventually lose your PII to the dark web?

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                Okay. Cool that’s what I said too. Just… the way you said it sounded like you were advocating for using bad parenting as a pretext for massive breaches of privacy and identity security.

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  The way you said it sounded like you were advocating for parents to watch their kids every second of every day, and if they don’t then whatever happens is their fault.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    10 days ago

    Americans- If you’re thinking “this isn’t so bad” please consider that all it takes is a teeny tiny, insignificant api added to the back end with absolutely no notice to users and suddenly the DHS has a database of dissenters, with cross-referenced IDs, photos of faces, chat history, link share history, raw uploaded photos, and approximate locations.

    Say no to this. If you need a temporary alternative that’s quick to get going, create a signal group chat with your friends.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      10 days ago

      ☝️🤓 Discord said they’re going to delete the data!

      Buster from Arthur saying "You really think someone would do that, just go on the Internet and tell lies?

      note

      The “someone” is referring to Discord, not you.

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 days ago

      Forget DHS or other government agencies, these companies have been shown to be untrustworthy stewards of our data from regular hackers.

      I get that discord is used to groom kids and there is a very real risk to allowing children to use it unsupervised, but that means kids devices are the ones that need to be locked down, not the rest of the world.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        No argument there. Just feels particularly relevant right now if you know what I mean.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Pain fucking ass but deleted my Discord account. Sure wish had a decent alternative. I see a lot of suggestions just don’t which to try? Any that work great with Linux Debian?

  • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    10 days ago

    Good.

    Discord is overused for help forums and wikis, which makes them extremely difficult to search and dependent upon third party software to be maintained. I hope this will force people away from that behaviour and back to good old fashioned messageboards that have been working just fine since at least the 80s

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Wait 6 months, this will have changed nothing for Discord and they’ll carry on. Most likely in 2-3 years they’ll deploy the age verify for all users, not just users trying to access “adult” stuff.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    10 days ago

    “I categorically cannot trust tech companies with that kind of personal data,” wrote one frustrated user, with many hoping they might be able to convince Discord to do a U-turn with enough public pressure. Others went further. “What a great way to kill your community,” added another longtime user, while some predicted “that’s game over for Discord” and remarked ruefully that “privacy on the internet is truly dead”.

    LOL. Just like Netflix price increases, or reddit third party apps thing, the protest will barely register in usage metrics and discord will carry on.

    These companies have effectively infinite resources with which to test changes with user reference groups, model potential outcomes, and mitigate risks. It’s pure hubris to suggest that you have a better understanding of Discord’s user base than they do.

    The vaaast majority of users will just do the video age test and never think about it again.

    • brap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      10 days ago

      Man 100%. Every now and then you hear that Facebook is “hemorrhaging users” or “it’s all over” but most normal people just don’t give a fuck and use it because they’re already there and their friends are too. This’ll be no different.

      • criscodisco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ve been off Facebook for at least 15 years. I’ve been trying to move people away from it for so long, or at least getting people to stop sharing shit about their kids, but a lot of people use it as their primary means of communication, news, photo sharing, etc. I just don’t get it. I do think most people I know just have ghost accounts now, though. But for some, Facebook is their internet. When they send me Facebook links, I just don’t interact with it at all. I don’t know what they sent me because I refuse to click the link, and even if I did, Facebook is blocked by my firewall and DNS so I won’t even be able to see it without getting around my own network. I just don’t even respond.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        hmm idk, i only know like 2 people in my life that still use Facebook heavily. i know it’s different in India though.

        Facebook has seen stagnation or user drops in most mature markets, it’s still growing in growing markets. India especially represents like half of all Facebook now.

        no idea where you might be from, but this is not a globally universal issue. this will likely play out differently in different markets.

        • brap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          That’s a real good point. Here in the UK I’m the only one out of my friends group who doesn’t use it. Here’s me also jumping to conclusions that it’s the same everywhere !

        • These_Opposite4228@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          In India, it’s pretty much the old generation and elders who use it due to old habit I think. Most kids nowadays use instagram.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Not only that, verification is not mandatory. So, unless you frequent some questionable 2 furry goatse 1 cup channels, there is literally nothing to worry about. The rest will gladly verify their age and jerk off to their favorite AI generated porn.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        They’ve stated elsewhere that even though they’re deploying “age inference” (whatever that is), verification is mandatory if you don’t want your account to be restricted to PG-13, basically.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 days ago

    The real problem is, that the majority of users won’t change, and it’s the users that make Discord. There could be a much better alternative but if users are too lazy to change, it is worth nothing.

    This is the case with Facebook messenger too. There are great alternatives, but it’s messenger that has the userbase

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      And compounding the issue is that there isn’t a better alternative to discord in terms of feature set and accessibility. Matrix is the closest, but its just… not there yet. There’s no option for people who care about privacy that isn’t a steep downgrade, and that just sucks.

        • Wimopy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          Not OP, but I’ll answer from my own perspective. Note that Discord terminology can be a bit weird, since a server is just a unique shared group space, but hopefully makes sense.

          So you can:

          • Have private chats with one or multiple individuals.
          • Start audio or video calls through those chats, and screen share/stream in them.
          • I’ll also mention the ability to send not just text, but images, videos, embedded GIFs, files, so on.
          • in servers you get the same thing, broken into text and voice channels (the latter allowing the full range of audio, video, and screen share).
          • in servers each user can be given roles to determine which channels they can see and use, or edit, among various other permissions.
          • Pinned messages, @ mentions for roles.
          • Though I don’t use it much anymore, the option to effectively subscribe to a channel on another server to have messages from there propagate over (e.g.: a uni club server announces an event and you see it on another server in an events channel)
          • also servers don’t have any upper limits on members, at least not one I’ve ever seen hit
          • Bot integration via API.
          • oh, also it all works on desktop or mobile (because it’s mostly just a web app, but still)

          And key thing is: all very easy to get started with, whether you’re just wanting to join a server, or start an entire community.

          Big deal for my uses currently is voice chat and screen share in one place, while still being able to organise stuff into separate channels, pin messages in them, etc.

          I think right now if I had to replace it, assuming I could get the people I interact with off (which is either 20 or 1500 people, depending on how much I’d want to carry with me), it’d have to be a mix of Matrix/Stoat and probably Steam’s built-in features. Maybe a classic forum. That is, if I wanted to have all the features I use. I could do with less, but it’s frustrating.

          I think the alternatives will get there eventually, self-hosted even, but self-hosting also has a hardware cost.

          That said, I really don’t know why software stuff was ever moved on discord. My uses are gaming and university community-related.

    • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      For people that don’t like Discord, this change does probably nothing. I only start it when I need it. I do basic communication,I don’t buy anything and I don’t follow 18+ content.

      For all purposes this change just decreases the likelihood of accidentally seeing pr0n.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s a sliding slope though. The initial reasoning is fair. But it will eventually spread to other features like (potentially) creating and owning servers or holding administrative and moderation roles

        It’s the same with the chat control currently looking over EU. Nobody can say that they are against efforts to stop CSAM. The issue is that the efforts don’t limit themselves to fighting that. Likewise the age verification on Discord does not seem to be targeted or limited to certain content. They are leaving the door open to use it any way they want

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    10 days ago

    they don’t arrest child traffickers and rapists.

    No no, it’s the child at fault for being at risk around them.

  • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Many of the communities I am in are pissed and these aren’t even tech people, this is even worse than what reddit did.The thing that most people online hate is age verification, who thought this was a good idea, reminds me of when Tumblr decided to ban porn same level of stupidity.

    • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      They for sure made the calculation, how many leave maybe 10-20% if we are lucky. How many stay and give them the right to sell their most sensitive data. How much money do they make with the data? Its more than they lose for sure.

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I tried it recently, I used a temporary account for it. I think IRC is way more user-friendly: I wasn’t allowed access to anything , for no stated reason. So as far as I’m concerned, Discord is where information goes to die. Too bad some project hide all of theirs there.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Same here, been hating on Discord from day one since you are the product with free services.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 days ago

    After what happened in Nepal last year, this 100% tracks with the dystopian narrative we are currently living. The powers that be saw a small country use it as a tool to affect change. To me, and tell me if I lm jumping to conclusions here, its obvious as to why this policy change is happening at all, to prevent the site from being used in that manner again.

      • Bigboi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 days ago

        The youth used discord to coordinate an overthrow of the government, and used it to organise a vote for who to replace the leader with.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Note, this is happening for the same reason Reddit started enshittifying much harder all of a sudden. Discord wants to do an IPO and so they’re going to suddenly start squeezing their users to make the numbers look good just in time for that IPO. Their bet is that they have enough momentum that enough people will stick with them long enough for the IPO to succeed, and after that happens, it’s someone else’s problem.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        kinda like gamers in general.

        Cry, and cry, and cry, and stir up a big shit storm about whatever the latest greatest grievance is… Then continue to speak with their wallet by shoveling hundreds of dollars to the companies doing all the atrocious shit they hate and complain about.

    • ianonavy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I use it to stay connected to my local community including the high school robotics team I help mentor. I don’t have much of a choice. :(

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        As I understand it, you should be fine unless that server is doing 18+ stuff. Don’t verify, discord will assume you’re a teenager. I’m leaving because I don’t have any ties like that. Maybe you could convince the server to move elsewhere?

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        they would allow it to record conversations in their house while the computer is off. people do not give a shit

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    hunting for alternatives

    I’ve heard people mention Matrix, but I’ve not tried it yet.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s terrible. They’ve had years and years to get their shit together and they still can’t. It’s just horrendously bad.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        I use it all the time. There are many mature clients, and matrix is a protocol, so I don’t know what you mean. Since the sliding sync implementations, I have found it really nice to use.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Don’t know what to tell you. I’m literally unable to read messages sent to me, they all show up as “unable to decrypt”. If I can’t even use the damn protocol then how many clients it has doesn’t matter.

          And I have tried different clients.

          And as far as I’ve read, this “unable to decrypt” affects a lot of users.

          • theherk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            What server are you using and with which client most recently? It sounds like your device is unverified so untrusted or the key isn’t present.

            To expand, “unable to decrypt” would affect a lot of users. That’s a good thing and exactly what you want it to do when not correctly trusted.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              I’m using the default matrix server and I’ve tried with Element and FluffyChat. I’ve never used a different device to access Matrix. It has always been Firefox through Element, and then when that stopped working I switched to try to use FluffyChat which also did not work.

              To expand, “unable to decrypt” would affect a lot of users. That’s a good thing and exactly what you want it to do when not correctly trusted.

              No, you do not want this affecting every user who has done nothing to change their environment. The device is still trusted, else I wouldn’t be able to sign in and get new messages at all. Here’s a massive list detailing many of the ways this can happen and note that this goes back to 2022. So for 4 years now they’ve had numerous issues with thousands of users being able to decrypt messages sent on the only device they’ve ever used and it still isn’t fixed.

              • theherk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 days ago

                Maybe I came off as dismissive or just stupid, but I really did mean to be helpful. Of course you don’t want users experience bad interactions. I meant if those interactions were for an actual intended reason. So yeah, never mind.

                Bummer you’ve had a hard time. I think they and the free software community are trying to put together a good solution.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Sorry, clearly I responded too harshly. Honestly I’m just tired of the suggestions to use Matrix, when myself (and several other people I know personally) have constant issues with it. I’ve tried to use Matrix for over 3 years now and I am required to use it sometimes, but every time I’m incredibly frustrated.

                  I think they and the free software community are trying to put together a good solution.

                  I agree, and I do think we need that, but sometimes the focus should be on usability before security. I know how much that sucks, but if you look at Lemmy you see the same thing. The focus was on usability first. Security came later, because (honestly) security is kinda pointless when every user can set up their own instance and intercept any posts they want. We’ll get there eventually with security, but if people aren’t using your platform then security is pointless.

      • Willoughby@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        they

        Your server, not mine, homie. Shop around for a better admin who actually knows how to install the thing.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          So the Matrix developers/creators don’t know how to actually install the thing then? lol not a good response homie.

          • Willoughby@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            The overloaded, overbloated main instance?

            No, they don’t. It either shouldn’t exist or should be broken up.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              So the devs who created it can’t run an instance and it doesn’t scale properly. Yeah, I’m just gonna go out on a real short limb here and say that maybe the problem isn’t the instance.

              Matrix is terrible any way you slice it.

    • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Stoat.chat seems to be a more likely alternative. I love matrix, but I don’t think it can replace Discord. Not yet.

    • ninepointeight@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Slightly related. Does anyone know of any decent Matrix clients (apps) on Android and/or Linux? Because, and I don’t mean to be rude when I say this but…Element is very, very bad.

  • kurmudgeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 days ago

    So they’re going to turn everybody into teenagers. Last I checked, teenagers can’t buy things like nitro right? Doesn’t that completely fuck up their own business model?

    • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      They must have come up with some sort of plan to merit losing some nitro users for harvesting personal information.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 days ago

      Revolt is now called Stoat Chat. Some sort of legal issue apparently.

      Anyway, for those who don’t know, it’s basically an open source clone of Discord. Definitely worth a look, probably where I’ll my stuff now.

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        yeah it’s the closest to a real discord clone, at least discord before they introduced screen sharing

          • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            That’s why IRC isn’t and never will be a replacement for Discord. Most people don’t care to accept comprimises and friction and people developing the alternatives can not impose compromises on their users and expect general market adoption.

            I really wish there was some real alternative that actually worked like lemmy communities for example where you wouldn’t need to self host but be able to use a server someone else made available to be able to create a community there. And search engine indexing, that would be a must imo.

            • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Then people are cooked, only way you can do all the shit discord does is by having massive funding to pay for all the backend. Or we can brutally murder all the advertisers and slowly move back into a sustainable tech society through fear of tech bro hunts.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      Guilded is dead. Their website redirects to a thank-you page of some sort. I remember trying it out ages ago and I thought it was pretty decent competition for Discord and had a lot of the same features, but ultimately it would have been susceptible to the same kind of fuckery that Discord is giving us right now. These private companies only want to extract value out of their users.

      • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        I signed up yesterday and just got my verification a little while ago. I hear that they’re being swamped right now. I wonder why? 🤔

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      Guilded went to Roblox-only in 2025. I’d never heard of it until someone else mentioned it as an alternative.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Trying to point my friends towards matrix/element, they already started a teamspeak server instead though >. >

      The biggest issue is it didn’t seem like matrix/element has streaming video in voice chat, we use that pretty heavily as we’ll play different games and just hang and talk several streaming at a time.

    • bytepursuits@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Would absolutely advise against telegram. They have your phone number and you have 0 privacy. There is 0 support. If you are banned - there is nowhere to file complaint and you just lose all your contacts.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      This is a free to use platform, just saying:

      Meet Pavel Durov, the tech billionaire who founded Telegram

      Pavel Durov was born in St. Petersburg in Soviet Russia.

      The tech entrepreneur cofounded the encrypted messaging service Telegram with his brother Nikolai in 2013. The brothers were born into a family of intellectuals, according to a biography on the Digital-Life-Design Conference website. Durov spoke at the conference in January 2012.

      Durov is now worth $17.1 billion, according to Forbes. Much of his fortune comes from Telegram, which he said hit 1 billion users in March 2025.

      https://www.businessinsider.com/pavel-durov-telegram-billionaire-russia-instagram-wealth-founder-dubai-lifestyle-2022-3?op=1