• Nvidia and Micron are making emotional appeals to consumers while PC users express frustration with big AI companies’ practices and self-serving motives.
  • Memory vendors predict DRAM and SSD shortages lasting until mid-2027, while new tariffs on advanced computing chips and potential Steam Machine pricing over $1,000 add to consumer concerns.
  • The article highlights how corporations use emotional messaging to mask financial interests, advising consumers to remain skeptical of such appeals.
  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Forget ram. Wait until there’s widespread power outages yet you’re somehow paying 10x for your electricity bill because of the new data center down the street.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      With gas prices at multiyear lows and electricity being so expensive it’s really hard to justify electrifying appliances. I was considering doing so (gas dryer, stove, water heater, furnace), but I think if I did I’d be paying an extra $300/month for quite a long time and that’s a hard pill to swallow.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        I went through this process in 2012-2016 - took out the gas dryer, gas stove and replaced them with electric. Mostly because my wife’s family has a history of asthma and the data for gas appliances and asthma is disconcerting to say the least. Especially for kids.

        Good luck with your eventual transition!

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        AI slop with the audacity to block anyone with Privacy Badger enabled, like, “we worked hard to produce this AI slop so we deserve to make money scraping your personal data”

        (edit: oh wait, I just noticed you meant OP’s summary. Yeah, blatant slop, get to fuck OP)

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    These people keep saying “it’s the future” but it just seems like they’re chasing pink elephants and forcing us to partake in the delusion.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 month ago

    They(the companies) want AI to takeover so badly. They know they can control everyone if only we would embrace their slop. The idea we all have a terminal that has no storage and no computing ability that just allows us to access their slop remotely. For a forever fee of course.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lol

    “Our viewpoint is that we are trying to help consumers around the world. We’re just doing it through different channels. […] What’s going on right now is that the TAM [ed: Total Addressable Market] and data center is growing just absolutely tremendously. And we want to make sure that, as a company, we help fulfill that TAM as well.”

    Let me translate that for you:

    Yes we definitely want to support the consumers, but hey look, the thing is, these data centers want to buy a lot of memory, and guess what, they’re willing to buy it in bulk even at a huge mark up! Like just think about that… We’re gonna make so much money!

    But uh, yeah uh, I feel you, that sucks bro and I appreciate you. But, dude, seriously, look at all this money! So yeah, stay strong guys, tweet about us! And don’t forget, if you want to be informed about the best memory deals, definitely sign up for our newsletter! Just put your email right in this field…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Way, way back, capitalism was a version of “the customer is always right.” Various companies would compete to sell a product at the right price point and quality the customer could accept. It wasn’t perfect, but it was pointed mostly the right direction.

    Now capitalism is just the few major companies competing to see who can make the biggest cash grab and fuck the regular customer with prices, fees, and enshittification. Now we have dystopian monopolies divorced from the consumers.

    • Four_mile_circus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      You could go further and say what’s happening now isn’t capitalism at all. Yanis Varoufakis calls the modern world economy “technofeudalism”: it’s controlled by information hypercompanies like Amazon, Google, and Apple, that make money not by producing anything, but by controlling the flow of information between consumers and producers, and charging producers rent for access to consumers.

      If you’re an app developer, you pay Google and Apple whatever they ask, and you follow their rules, or you don’t get to sell your product in their app stores; if you sell products, you give Amazon their cut, or you don’t get to sell in their market. And because Google and Apple and Amazon have so effectively entrapped customers, capitalists who don’t agree to their terms can’t get to their consumers at all.

      Capitalists aren’t the masters of the economy - they’re vassals. They pay their technofeudal lords their tribute, their 30% cut of revenue, and compete with each other for the remaining scraps. And then they raise prices and cut wages, squeeze their workers and exploit their consumers even more, in order to make enough money to survive at all.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t disagree. I don’t know about strictly “techno-“, because it isn’t restricted just to the insertion of technological rent extractors every step of the way, it’s also every single business trying to maximize profits at every step along the production line, and they’re all effective monopolies that have no other way to make the line move up other than to charge for it. Almost nobody is making anything new, it’s just putting different color lipstick on a pig.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Capitalism, when unchecked, tends to create those giant monopolies you’ve mentioned. It is capitalism at its end game, total consolidation.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I remember back in the reddit days telling people that the EU doesn’t have trillion dollar tech megacorps because we don’t want companies to have this much power and the americans calling it cope. Well no ones laughing now.

          • demonsword@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            But today’s money doesn’t really have any frontiers our boundaries. If a corp is being openly traded in the stock market, it belongs to the very same assholes that own the americans megacorps.

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      The customer is always right was never a thing.

      For a start, it’s an intentional shortening of the actual phrase, for exploitative reasons, of “the customer is always right in matters of taste”

      Which just means “if they want to buy ugly shit, let them”

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s exactly what monopolies and oligopolies end up doing, whatever is in their interest to do. If anti-trust laws were actually used to enforce competition, we wouldn’t be here. But since we can’t compete with the campaign donations of the companies those laws should be regulating, we get no regulation at all and end up here. Selfish people, being selfish, making everything worse for everyone else.

  • deadymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    And all these memory are spent on the generation of pornographic content in the highest quality.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are they really able to replicate pornography like that? I know that for normal stuff, the videos are only under ten seconds or so.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You can get up to 12 minutes locally even if you’re patient. Technically you can go way further if you do it in parts though, and use multiple generations. Might take a few weeks to “direct” it right though, depending what you want to make. If it’s vanilla stuff, maybe 3 days for a 45 minute video on a 3090? (Via 3-5 minute chained segments, with smaller second long segments for smooth camera angle changes)

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    weird emotional appeals

    “I think we’ve done a lot of damage lately with very well-respected people who have painted a doomer narrative, end of the world narrative, science fiction narrative. […] It’s not helpful to people, it’s not helpful to the industry, it’s not helpful to society, it’s not helpful to the governments.”

    “Our viewpoint is that we are trying to help consumers around the world. We’re just doing it through different channels. […] What’s going on right now is that the TAM [ed: Total Addressable Market] and data center is growing just absolutely tremendously. And we want to make sure that, as a company, we help fulfill that TAM as well.”

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Im kind of wondering if that isnt the real end game- there was a Bezos quote i saw the other day, where he said he wants to see personal computing die out in favor of essentially cloud based, where users own minimal hardware and just rent compute time for everything.

      It kind of feels like they dont actually need ai to succeed- its already achieving the goal of denying components to end users. If they maintain that scarcity long enough, they can kill the pc/ laptop status quo. (Especially if chip makers abandon those fabs for data center tailored units for a whole generation, until theres nothing viable left on the market)

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The good thing is that we have a few giants with vested interests in resisting that. PC OEMs like Dell and HP, Clevo, Intel/AMD who still have huge consumer sales, and the big one:

        Apple.

        Apple is all-in on personal compute, and they have the muscle to resist the anticompetitive plays, hopefully.

        • Nanowith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Apple can make Chrome book equivalents, they want you to rent compute power not computers.

          Natively you’d be able to run VLC on a good day if you’re lucky, but everything else will be online with a subscription attached.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Apple likes being able to distribute apps and have users pay subscriptions to run them locally. This is what they already do; even 3rd party apps get a cut to Apple.

            And its why iPhones are so powerful, other than their meager RAM capacity.

        • ebolapie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Tangential, but ironically the only used laptops (e: for repair) you can buy right now that haven’t been gutted for RAM and NVME are macbooks and similar that have everything soldered onto the motherboard.

      • maxie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Such crazy logic from Bezos, personal computers are now more powerful and capable than ever, fulfilling the average users needs easily. Hey let’s just get rid of that and make them use our servers. He tries to frame it as the logical conclusion but the only conclusion I can see is he wants more money.

  • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    30 days ago

    Here’s an idea: a catalogue of companies who pulled this shit during the bubble, so we know who not to buy from when it bursts.